Looking for critique please on how to improve this image
cjmchch
Registered Users Posts: 222 Major grins
I'd like to get some comments/critique on this image please. I have pp'd it using varoius techniques and wonder where I can improve it/crop it..etc.
Canon - Manfrotto - Pocketwizard - Sekonic - Westcott - Hoya - Singh Ray
http://chrismckayphotography.com
http://chrismckayphotography.com
0
Comments
I'd experiment with cropping to the tops of the clouds on the left and crop a bit from the right to eliminate the reflections in the water.
http://lrichters.smugmug.com
Jeff Meyers
I like the composition and concept. THe curve of the guardrails draws the eye nicely to the BG.
I think it is a bit too much contrast - the road is a bit overblown and the shadows have lost some detail.
Hope that helps.
Dave
http://davedilli.zenfolio.com/
When I trim off either half of the height of the image above the line of the mountains (i.e. the top half of the sky) or half the height occupied by the bridge, the line of the mountains no longer dissects the image, and resulting frame provides a more pleasing result (to me). YMMV.
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
Darken the concrete a bit.
The sky looks overdone..back off on it a bit.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Here's the end result......what do you think now?
http://chrismckayphotography.com
I think that's better. But there's a philosophical point here that merits some consideration. Your final product is a work of art. It ought to be. It's not, and never can be, simply a xerox of reality. What difference does it really make that the road was/is concrete? If that doesn't work for your artistic interpretation of the scene, then by all means alter it so that it works in your final image.
Of course, that assumes you can do so without loosing quality or without making it look artificial and out of place. But those are artistic considerations, not questions about whether the images accurately replicates reality. Right? Some images need to replicate reality. Sure. But not a shot like this, which, I assume, is intended to evoke a mood or emotion.
What do you think?
Jeff Meyers
I can't argue with that....very well said really.
My response:
http://chrismckayphotography.com
Caroline
I think Jeff's words are right on--the image is art and you are the artist, so you need to like it.
Lauren Blackwell
www.redleashphoto.com
Haha...thanks for the comments first and foremost. It is interesting looking through others eyes and seeing what they see.
This road is actually about 100kms long, is a single lane dirt/gravel road, apart from the odd bridge along the way where rivers are too deep to traverse, so every hur is an off hour on this road. A lot of the reason for the crispness in the colours, and the photo is the lack of pollution in this area as it is off the beaten track. For the most part it is incredibly bumpy, dirty and very hilly, not to mention winding its way up and down hills. This area is covered in snow in winter and obvioulsy makes for a great winter shot, just a lot more dangerous getting there.
Road side litter.......this is New Zeland my friend...we use rubbish bins, and for the odd ungrateful tourist that throws their rubbish out the window, we pick it up for them (well that's the version I'll give anyway).
http://chrismckayphotography.com
Well I thought I'd give it a try...what do you think?
http://chrismckayphotography.com
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
All photos are Copyrighted and Registered. Please don't use without permission.
5DSR 16-35 2.8L III 24-70 2.8L II 70-200 2.8L IS II
Website: Tom Price Photography
Blog: Capturing Photons
Facebook: Tom Price Photography
Whatever the outcome, it has been a worthwhile exercise for me in adjusting an image to meet the needs of the viewer, but also, trying my hand at something new.
Thanks to you all.clapclap
http://chrismckayphotography.com