Sunrise on the Skagit River

coscorrosacoscorrosa Registered Users Posts: 2,284 Major grins
edited January 5, 2009 in Landscapes
I went there to shoot photos of the eagles (saw over 100+, most on a 12 mile float down the river), but since I arrived just after sunrise there was still some decent light for landscapes. I only had a wide angle (16-35) and my wildlife lens (100-400), I have a friend borrowing my 24-105, and I really wished I had it for these.

#1: Which I've titled "Stupid @!#$!@%!$%! Branches". This was the composition I first saw with the S-curve of the river and the mountain in the background, but there wasn't a spot I could get to to eliminate the branches from the sides without getting wet, or spending hours in photoshop, as I have trouble removing anything that's not a dust spot):

448376318_4uo76-L.jpg

#1.5: The above photo kind of bugged me, so I reworked a similar composition (that had some easier branch removal), this is only a single exposure:

449067745_8oPFN-L.jpg

#2 (Make the branches your friend, obvious GND effect here, oh well):

448375946_sLemg-L.jpg

#3 (Get away from the branches entirely):

448375567_feKuP-L.jpg

I might go back soon with an extra change of clothes and my 24-105 and actually do these properly :D The good news is that this location is pretty accessible even in winter.

Comments

  • TylwyddTylwydd Registered Users Posts: 190 Major grins
    edited January 4, 2009
    Really like the mood and composition of #1. Too bad about the trees indeed... Didn't think about a chainsaw rather than photoshop ? :D
    Olympus fan :D : E520 ; ZD 50 mm ; ZD 14-54 mm ; ZD 50-200 mm SWD

    http://tylwydd.smugmug.com/
  • jeffmeyersjeffmeyers Registered Users Posts: 1,535 Major grins
    edited January 4, 2009
    These are nice. The boundary of the purple clouds right above the left slope of the mt on #1 seems to have some processing artifacts. Is it a bit of haloing or something else.

    Someday we landscape photographers will have a handheld laser powerful enough to lop off branches without moving from behind the camera.
    More Photography . . . Less Photoshop [. . . except when I do it]
    Jeff Meyers
  • hawkeye978hawkeye978 Registered Users Posts: 1,218 Major grins
    edited January 4, 2009
    I think I like #1 the best because of the mood. If you are willing to try, I don't think it would be that bad to clone out the branches. The nice random cloud patterns give a lot of good material to eliminate the branches without being obvious.
  • coscorrosacoscorrosa Registered Users Posts: 2,284 Major grins
    edited January 4, 2009
    jeffmeyers wrote:
    These are nice. The boundary of the purple clouds right above the left slope of the mt on #1 seems to have some processing artifacts. Is it a bit of haloing or something else.
    Among other things, yes. I kind of gave up on the photo after seeing the branches, I probably shouldn't have posted it, but I needed to share my "see how I screwed up a great opportunity" story :D It's a merge of three exposures, there is some haloing as you said, usually I pay attention to that stuff, this was the first time I used PS (CS4) to do the HDR merge rather than Photomatix, mostly for experimentation.
    jeffmeyers wrote:
    Someday we landscape photographers will have a handheld laser powerful enough to lop off branches without moving from behind the camera.
    Either that or a small, noiseless, solar-powered stabilized hovercraft.

    Actually I can envision situations when both would be useful...
  • coscorrosacoscorrosa Registered Users Posts: 2,284 Major grins
    edited January 4, 2009
    hawkeye978 wrote:
    I think I like #1 the best because of the mood. If you are willing to try, I don't think it would be that bad to clone out the branches. The nice random cloud patterns give a lot of good material to eliminate the branches without being obvious.

    Yeah, I agree I can probably do it without it being blatantly obvious (it would take me awhile though). I have too may eagle photos to go through before I go back to these landscapes though :D
  • shniksshniks Registered Users Posts: 945 Major grins
    edited January 4, 2009
    #1 is awesome Ron. Love it! thumb.gif


    Cheers,
  • coscorrosacoscorrosa Registered Users Posts: 2,284 Major grins
    edited January 4, 2009
    shniks wrote:
    #1 is awesome Ron. Love it! thumb.gif


    Cheers,

    Thanks, I just added "#1.5" which is #1 without branches (a different photo actually, but a similar composition, and only a single exposure instead of multiple - sometimes I just need to step back and not make things so damn complicated... :D)
  • rontront Registered Users Posts: 1,473 Major grins
    edited January 4, 2009
    Well Ron, I guess I don't always go by all of the rules and sometimes like pictures that others do not (although that is not the case here), but I really think that #1 is a great picture!! I have just been crusin through Digital Grin this evening while relaxing for my B-Day and saw your post here. I really like the photos.

    Thanks for sharing them, Ron

    I am also looking forward to your Eagles pictures.
    "The question is not what you look at, but what you see". Henry David Thoreau

    http://ront.smugmug.com/
    Nikon D600, Nikon 85 f/1.8G, Nikon 24-120mm f/4, Nikon 70-300, Nikon SB-700, Canon S95
  • coscorrosacoscorrosa Registered Users Posts: 2,284 Major grins
    edited January 4, 2009
    ront wrote:
    Well Ron, I guess I don't always go by all of the rules and sometimes like pictures that others do not (although that is not the case here), but I really think that #1 is a great picture!! I have just been crusin through Digital Grin this evening while relaxing for my B-Day and saw your post here. I really like the photos.

    Thanks for sharing them, Ron

    I am also looking forward to your Eagles pictures.

    Thanks, and happy birthday! I added another shot similar to #1 (labeled "1.5") that I think is better.

    For the eagles, I just posted the thread in the wildlife forum, which also links to the full gallery:

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=116229
  • AbiciriderbackAbiciriderback Registered Users Posts: 191 Major grins
    edited January 5, 2009
    Even with the branches still very nice images great color with the lighting. Was this the Float trip that meets at Rockport and takes off from Marblemount?

    Ray Still
  • coscorrosacoscorrosa Registered Users Posts: 2,284 Major grins
    edited January 5, 2009
    Even with the branches still very nice images great color with the lighting. Was this the Float trip that meets at Rockport and takes off from Marblemount?

    Ray Still

    It meets at a B&B located a few hundred feet from the river in Marblemount and then goes downstream about 12 miles to Rockport.

    Here's the website with more info:

    http://www.blueskyoutfitters.com/skagit-eagle.php

    Definitely recommended for eagle watching. I would recommend you bring some extra shoes and socks to change in to, and use rubber boots rather than hiking boots (they can provide you with the boots).
Sign In or Register to comment.