PLEASE help me decide!! I'm upgrading..
mycaptures
Registered Users Posts: 71 Big grins
..and I seriously cannot decide to go with Canon 50D or Nikon D90 or even Canon 40D. I've tested all of them. Over and over. At first I wanted the D90, then I decided I just couldn't give up the L series lenses (I don't have any, but just the idea of not getting them). Then I tested the D90 again and I really liked it. I wish I could walk around with it, but don't want to spend the money renting it. Then I thought, well I'll get the Canon 40D so I can have more to spend on the glass. But then I went and tested the cameras again and was leaning towards the Nikon AGAIN.
My brain hurts. I've researched, read a lot and still can't decide. Please give me your opinions based on what you use/have used. Sample photos would be awesome.
Thank you!
Save me from myself.
My brain hurts. I've researched, read a lot and still can't decide. Please give me your opinions based on what you use/have used. Sample photos would be awesome.
Thank you!
Save me from myself.
Shilowe, getting my masters in psychology,
photographing mommy to Rayne (5) and Quinlan (baby boy) and wife to Dave.:photo
photographing mommy to Rayne (5) and Quinlan (baby boy) and wife to Dave.:photo
0
Comments
http://www.jonathanswinton.com
http://www.swintoncounseling.com
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=116471
Dont' really know anything about the Nikon, but I've been extremely happy with the 50D and L glass.
To see photos with it, TASnyder.com It was used on the Work Party, John & Sheila's 50th, Christmas 2008 and the Grand Canyon.
All photos are Copyrighted and Registered. Please don't use without permission.
5DSR 16-35 2.8L III 24-70 2.8L II 70-200 2.8L IS II
i can show you great photos from my camera, and i can show even better photos from the same camera if i handed it to someone with more experiance than i for a moment or two....... see what im getting too?
also, dont think the "L" lens is king....its not.
no matter the name brand, you will get what you pay for!
in general, take a 24mm $2000 lens, it will give you a $2000 lens quality image. a 24mm $600 lens will give you a $600 lens quality image... forget the term "L" and think in $$$
its a matter of what quality is to you....
pickup a camera, dont look at it.....
feel it, find the controls..... what works with your mindset?
what control layout makes sense?
what can you imagine holding up to your eye over and over for three hours?
Think about what you will be using the camera for and what lenses you will need. See if Nikon or Canon has a better line up for what you will need. If they are equal, then play with both camera and see which one has a better feel for you.
The 50D is a great camera, the new LCD is AMAZING, haven't been impressed with the ISO performance, I'm sure the 40D is a little better there because it has less MP, the 50D also takes up A LOT more space on CF cards. I have been very pleased with the 40D and the 50D. I personally upgraded when the 50D came out and am glad I did.
Honestly, spend the money renting them, walk around and play with each. I don't know about the place you rent from, but the local place I do has a policy that if you rent something and decide to buy it within so many days you get that money that you rented with towards the purchase of the new lens (or body if the case may be).
I hope this helps.
Oh, and go 50D plus L glass... :-D
OneTwoFiftieth | Portland, Oregon | Modern Portraiture
My Equipment:
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon EOS 1
Lenses: Canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 50mm f/1.4, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8
Lighting: Canon 580EXII, Canon 420 EX, 12" Reflector, Pocket Wizard Plus II (3), AB800 (3), Large Softbox
Stability: Manfrotto 190CXPRO3 Tripod, Manfrotto 488RC4 Ball Head, Manfrotto 679B Monopod
The cameras you mentioned testing are all great cameras to be sure. Whatever you get is probably much less important than how you use it. I fear that if you are spending this much energy on this purchase you may second guess the purchase as well.
Imagine instead what you could be doing with a camera in your hands. When you have achieved a state of knowing that "you" make more of a difference than the camera, you can be happy just shooting and capturing images.
Think about it:
You get to chose the subject matter and location, not the camera.
You get to chose the lighting and composition, not the camera.
You get to chose a lens.
You get to chose a processing method and display method.
Most of photography is about the individual. Most of successful photography is also about the individual making choices that are appropriate to the success of the image.
Make a camera choice based on the real criteria that matters most to you. Forget the fluff and show. What matters should be about your needs, not your wants.
What is it you really need?
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Any IQ differences among any of the current 8-15mp "crop" sensor cameras are minute. Therefore pick one, any one, based on how it feels to you, how you like the interface, features (video, inbody IS, lens MA etc...) and of course the lenses.
As for lenses don't base your choice on what lenses are available but on what lenses you can or think you can afford. Sure L lenses are nice but once you get beyond the 70-200/2.8 things jump to $4000.
Don't be afraid to look at Olympus, Pentax or Sony as they all have their own set of features.
Gene
OTOH, Nikon is making phenomenal cameras right now. Personally, if I didn't have so much invested in Canon lenses and was starting over right now, I'd look at the D90, D300, the 50D, and the 5D2. I'd probably narrow that list to the D300 and the 50D. I'd then try them both out, and buy the one that felt better to me.
I've been shooting Canon since the mid-80s, so the Canon layout is completely natural to me.
All advice given above is good. Ziggy's advice is especially good.
My philosophy on camera bodies is much the same as my advice on choosing a computer (I'm an IT guy): buy as much as you can afford, after considering what you will use it for. It may or may not have a useful life beyond three years; get all the features you need. Replace it when it's time.
Lenses can last a lifetime; bodies should last years, depending on use, abuse, and whether they have the features you need.
When the time is right, make that choice. Don't regret it. Learn the body; use it; enjoy it.
One last thing: it's the photographer that takes the picture, not the camera.
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
If I were in your shoes because you are asking, I would get the D90. I think it is an amazing camera and 3 of my friends are shooting with it. I love the quality of the pics. You wont regret it.
But again, its your money and your choice, I can only suggest what I like!! Nikon lenses are excellent, so dont let the glass be your factor. Get the body that you like then go from there.
I can't speak of Nikon or the other guys, but why not get a 40D or a 30D and some great lenses, e.g., 17-55 f/2,8 IS. 30/40D and the 17-55 is a KILLER COMBINATION. And note that the 17-55 isn't an L. You can get a good used 30D for about $500, give or take.
You can't go wrong with any of the ones that you have stated, but even camera bodies of yore (two years or so old) are still very capable cameras.
www.tednghiem.com
I'm sorry but that brought a smile ...
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
At your peril my friend, at your peril :crazy
Olympus E420 with 14-42 and 50-200SWD.
There just aren't enough lenses out there to tempt me in that direction at the moment. The big two have thousands of old lenses kicking around waiting for someone to make a deal on. I like buying used, you get the better deal, some scratches, and save $$$.