Please tell me your fav Nikon Lens or off-brand Nikon mount lens

mycapturesmycaptures Registered Users Posts: 71 Big grins
edited February 7, 2009 in Cameras
Can you please tell me your fav lens for Nikon..kinda new to Nikon. I do mostly portraits of kids and newborns but also love to do landscapes. Please also state why you like it. I've read about different lenses but would love to get some opinions from here! Thanks!
Shilowe, getting my masters in psychology,
photographing mommy to Rayne (5) and Quinlan (baby boy) and wife to Dave.:photo

Comments

  • QarikQarik Registered Users Posts: 4,959 Major grins
    edited January 30, 2009
    here is my breakdown of newer nikon lens that I am familar with:

    18-200mm VR, probably the best all around lens for traveling and fits the bill "if you are only going to buy one lens". It not the best in any in the zooms but is failry good across the board.

    50mm 1.4 one the cheapest, sharpest versatile lens in the line up. A must have in many lineups. Good for portrait low light and general walk around lens. There is a new HSM version with improved bokeh and sharpness as well but $$.

    85mm 1.4 considered by many to be the ulitimate portrait lens. Dubbed the "cream machine" for the lovley bokeh and is incredibly sharp and great for low light. Exspensive at $900.

    "Pro-line" that covers from 14mm to 200mm at 2.8. $$$$

    70-200mm 2.8, The primary choice for sports, wildlife, even weddings etc. Sharp, great focusing, etc. Everyone seems to LOVE this lens.

    24-70mm 2.8, the sharpest zoom lens ever made by nikon.

    14-24mm 2.8, best wide angle lens for nikon. hands down.
    D700, D600
    14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
    85 and 50 1.4
    45 PC and sb910 x2
    http://www.danielkimphotography.com
  • cabinetbuffcabinetbuff Registered Users Posts: 189 Major grins
    edited January 30, 2009
    Qarik wrote:
    70-200mm 2.8, The primary choice for sports, wildlife, even weddings etc. Sharp, great focusing, etc. Everyone seems to LOVE this lens.
    Not those with FX cameras (D3/ D700) more about it here:

    http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/nikon_70-200_2p8_vr_n15/

    And here's a great review on the Nikon Lenses
    http://www.naturalart.ca/artist/cameragear.html

    My personal favorite is Nikon 35mm f/2.0 D-AF LENS - NI352DAF. It's small, contrasty, colorful, inexpensive and has a great focusing distance. I also really like the 14-24mm -- it's simply an amazing WA lens, but a bit too heavy on a D3, especially, hiking in the mountains where every gram counts.
  • Cygnus StudiosCygnus Studios Registered Users Posts: 2,294 Major grins
    edited January 30, 2009
    My complete lineup. Covers the spectrum of studio and macro work. I have a few that overlap and a couple for backups. My basic walk around kit is highlighted. Throw in some macro tubes, a 2X teleconverter, a couple of flashes, a sherpa to haul it all around, and this is my kit.

    Nikon

    Nikkor 14-24MM
    Nikkor 17-35mm
    Nikkor 24mm PC-E
    Nikkor 24-70mm
    Nikkor 50mm
    Nikkor 60mm Micro
    Nikkor 70-200mm
    Nikkor 85mm
    Nikkor 85mm Micro
    Nikkor 200-400mm
    Nikkor 300mm

    Off brand:

    Tamron 17-35mm
    Tamron 17-50mm

    Tamron 28-80mm

    Sigma 28-90mm Macro
    Sigma 70-300mm Macro
    Sigma BIGMA 50-500MM
    Steve

    Website
  • jonh68jonh68 Registered Users Posts: 2,711 Major grins
    edited January 30, 2009
    Not those with FX cameras (D3/ D700) more about it here:

    That specific review been pretty much shot down as irrelevant problems with the 70-200 on full frame.

    If corner sharpness is a problem when shooting brick walls, it may be relevant, as with shooting at the said brick wall against a clear blue sky in regards to vignetting. For 99% of the shots that pros get paid to take, it's not a problem.
  • AspectArtsAspectArts Registered Users Posts: 61 Big grins
    edited January 30, 2009
    Right now? At this moment, and probably for a long time to come (lol), my favorite is the Nikkor 24-70 2.8. I'm using it on a D80 and it is fabulous... super fast focus, quiet, awesome quality, tack sharp, great for indoors, wider angle, portraits, families, fast sports action, beautiful DOF... what's not to love? I hope to be testing it on a dance recital in our local theatre in February... can hardly wait!
    Lisa

    my site: www.aspectartsphoto.com
    my gear: nikon D700, 70-200 mm 2.8, 24-70 mm 2.8, 50 mm 1.4, SB600, AB800
  • cabinetbuffcabinetbuff Registered Users Posts: 189 Major grins
    edited January 30, 2009
    jonh68 wrote:
    That specific review been pretty much shot down as irrelevant problems with the 70-200 on full frame.

    If corner sharpness is a problem when shooting brick walls, it may be relevant, as with shooting at the said brick wall against a clear blue sky in regards to vignetting. For 99% of the shots that pros get paid to take, it's not a problem.

    Good to know, I am not a "pro" though, so it matters to me, since I am not making any money off of it, it has to be perfect to justify it's cost. :D But I know what you mean ...
  • DsrtVWDsrtVW Registered Users Posts: 1,991 Major grins
    edited January 31, 2009
    I use these on D300 and D50
    18-200mm VR walk around lens for general purpose when I do not want to haul gear around

    17-55mm f2.8 DX for wide angle low light events and portraits, landscapes

    50mm f1.8 nikkor Made in Japan (older lens new ones made in china) affordable & fast & sharp. Indoor low light no flash and artsy stuff. Portraits too

    75-300mm AF nikkor f4.5-5.6 outdoor events when I want something light and flexible.

    300mm AF ED f4 super sharp, good hand holdable lens for birds in flight
    this is the older all metal version built like a tank.Though the AF is slower than the AF-S version I love it.
    Canvasback 300mm on the D50
    460562955_XqnLK-L.jpg


    200mm VR f2 AF-S ED Incredibly sharp with fantastic bokeh. Great for low light action I use it with a TC 1.7IIE converter which makes it a 340 f3.3 495mm with the crop factor. Big lens.
    Sundown 200mm 1/1250 shutter f2 ISO 100
    452627076_hLxqG-L.jpg

    200mm 1/60 f2 ISO 800
    440893213_fvDGM-L.jpg
    Chris K. NANPA Member
    http://kadvantage.smugmug.com/
  • cabinetbuffcabinetbuff Registered Users Posts: 189 Major grins
    edited January 31, 2009
    DsrtVW wrote:
    200mm VR f2 AF-S ED Incredibly sharp with fantastic bokeh. Great for low light action I use it with a TC 1.7IIE converter which makes it a 340 f3.3 495mm with the crop factor. Big lens.
    Sundown 200mm 1/1250 shutter f2 ISO 100
    452627076_hLxqG-L.jpg

    thumb.gifIncredible shot -- depth, contrast, color -- it's 3D!
  • mycapturesmycaptures Registered Users Posts: 71 Big grins
    edited January 31, 2009
    Wow! Thanks for all the great responses..so many to choose from. I think I have a better idea though. Thank you SO much!!
    Shilowe, getting my masters in psychology,
    photographing mommy to Rayne (5) and Quinlan (baby boy) and wife to Dave.:photo
  • MalindiMalindi Registered Users Posts: 50 Big grins
    edited January 31, 2009
    Does anyone know if there is a good chart showing all the Nikon lenses in a decent grid order? Haven't come across one.

    Thanks.
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited January 31, 2009
    Malindi wrote:
    Does anyone know if there is a good chart showing all the Nikon lenses in a decent grid order? Haven't come across one.

    Thanks.

    Nikon has 2 pdf brochures you might be interested in:

    NIKKOR Lenses:
    http://chsvimg.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/pdf/nikkor_lenses_36p.pdf

    Lens Guide:
    http://chsvimg.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/pdf/Lens_guide_Ver5.pdf

    Printed, those would make a nice wall chart. thumb.gif
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • MalindiMalindi Registered Users Posts: 50 Big grins
    edited January 31, 2009
    ziggy53 wrote:
    Nikon has 2 pdf brochures you might be interested in:

    NIKKOR Lenses:
    http://chsvimg.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/pdf/nikkor_lenses_36p.pdf

    Lens Guide:
    http://chsvimg.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/pdf/Lens_guide_Ver5.pdf

    Printed, those would make a nice wall chart. thumb.gif

    Thanks, I did see those as well as some others with loads of detail. I just find the Nikon stuff hard to digest from a "hard information" aspect. I like to look past the fluff.

    I found this page last night:
    http://photo.net/equipment/manufacturer/nikon-cameras#nikon_3

    It seems to be pretty complete and well laid out.
  • HarveyMushmanHarveyMushman Registered Users Posts: 550 Major grins
    edited February 1, 2009
    The newest, of course. Which in my case means the 35mm f/2D. :D

    463068165_PMHu2-L.jpg


    463061391_EALfd-L.jpg


    462399661_d2FoV-L.jpg
    Tim
  • JovesJoves Registered Users Posts: 200 Major grins
    edited February 1, 2009
    Well for off brand I was quite surprised by the Tamron 28-300, it turned out to be a great walking around lens. It is also my only off brand lens. But I do plan on getting the Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 after seeing some pics from it and, hearing how the users liked it alot. I love my 80-400 VR for wild life. Also here is another site to find info on mostly Nikkor lenses but with a couple of off brands.
    http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_surv.html Just look up any lens type you are thing of and he has short sweet reviews. He also covers quite a few older lenses and, how compatable they are with the new cameras.
    I shoot therefore Iam.
    http://joves.smugmug.com/
  • cpallencpallen Registered Users Posts: 14 Big grins
    edited February 3, 2009
    Malindi wrote:
    Does anyone know if there is a good chart showing all the Nikon lenses in a decent grid order? Haven't come across one.

    Thanks.

    How about this?

    http://www.bythom.com/nikonlens.htm
  • MalindiMalindi Registered Users Posts: 50 Big grins
    edited February 3, 2009
    cpallen wrote:

    Sweet! clap.gif

    Thanks a bunch, this is very helpful.
  • Kyle DKyle D Registered Users Posts: 302 Major grins
    edited February 4, 2009
    I only have 3 lenses so far to go on my D50:

    - Nikon 50mm f/1.8
    - Sigma 70-300mm APO
    - Nikon 18-55mm II

    My absolute favorite is the 50mm, it is so light and sharp. Works great in low light situations and for both human and animal portraits. It's also currently my goto lens for when I'm shooting inside a darker horse arena at a barn. This has to be the best $100 CAD I've spent, I managed to pick it up used and haven't looked back. It's usually the lens that's on my D50.

    Next up is my Sigma 70-300 APO. I use/love this lens as long as there is good light. I use it alot outdoors at horse shows and such and get numerous amounts of keepers. Sure it doesn't have the quality of the pro-grade Nikon glass but for someone on a budget it does wonderfully. You can generally pick them up for about $150 CAD used. The macro function works pretty nicely too, although not a true 1:1 macro but it's good enough for me right now.

    Lastly, is my 18-55mm II kit lens that came with my D50. This has to be my least used lens because I find the other two far more versatile. The only time I use this lens is if I need the wider end. Other than that it's my 50mm all the way. Back in November I shot a wedding with the 18-55 II and the clients loved it. The entire wedding and dinner took place in a private residence. I would have preferred to use the 50mm but I needed the wider angle flexibility that the 18-55 offered. Thankfully my SB-600 and Gary Fong cloud lightsphere came to the rescue!

    Also, just so you know I am a university student on a budget.
    Kyle D.

    Not allowed to enter Henry's alone anymore...

    Kyle Derkachenko Photography
  • TRWhiteTRWhite Registered Users Posts: 30 Big grins
    edited February 5, 2009
    I am considering geting the Sigma BIGMA 50-500MM w/HSM for my D60.

    How do you like this lens? Is it a good buy? headscratch.gif

    Tim
    PPA
    SWPPA
    TPPA
    NAPP Member
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited February 5, 2009
    TRWhite wrote:
    I am considering geting the Sigma BIGMA 50-500MM w/HSM for my D60.

    How do you like this lens? Is it a good buy? headscratch.gif

    Tim

    The Sigma "Bigma" is a very good value. Like any extremely long lens it takes special handling to get the most from it at the long end. It also deserves some extra attention in post-processing.

    That said I have the non-DG version and like it pretty well. Like most long lenses it likes scenes with more contrast in order to be interesting. I don't expect too much from overcast days and flat lighting.

    Used properly, and assuming you get a good copy, it rewards you with an astonishing range of focal lengths and very high quality.

    I am most anxious to use the Bigma on a full frame body. While users note significant vignetting at the long end it appears to be correctable in software.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Cygnus StudiosCygnus Studios Registered Users Posts: 2,294 Major grins
    edited February 5, 2009
    I have the DG version and absolutely love it. Sure it is big and heavy, and a tad slow in less than good light, but no lens is perfect. It offers a nice range and is nice and sharp.
    I do see vignetting, but it isn't bad at all. Here is an example at the full 500mm Here is the exif
    In my opinion it is worth every cent.
    Steve

    Website
  • TRWhiteTRWhite Registered Users Posts: 30 Big grins
    edited February 6, 2009
    I have the DG version and absolutely love it. Sure it is big and heavy, and a tad slow in less than good light, but no lens is perfect. It offers a nice range and is nice and sharp.
    I do see vignetting, but it isn't bad at all. Here is an example at the full 500mm Here is the exif
    In my opinion it is worth every cent.

    Thank You for the replies. It looks like I will be adding this lens to my setup.
    :photo
    PPA
    SWPPA
    TPPA
    NAPP Member
  • manboumanbou Registered Users Posts: 105 Major grins
    edited February 7, 2009
    I do see vignetting, but it isn't bad at all. Here is an example at the full 500mm Here is the exif
    In my opinion it is worth every cent.
    Looks like if you crop to 8x10, you would lose the vignetting entirely.
    "[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Photography is often finding something cool and taking a picture of it."[/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] -- Ken Rockwell[/FONT]
Sign In or Register to comment.