And in response to your sig, don't. I've never done drugs, but I can only imagine the jonesing for camera equipment is just as bad as a physical addiction
I find myself hoping everytime I come home, that my dad has some gear he's looking to hand down to me
Realistically, the out of camera is better, albiet a bit flat lighting. The first one in original post needs less contrast, skin smooting, more defined light and shadowing for an "appeal" look. Keep going...it takes some practice getting the "right" look especially in post processing. The first shot has harsh light, accentuated skin blemishes, and overall near blown out highlights. I offer this observation as a help. Since you have a beautiful subject...make her so for display.
I may have. I'm getting obsessive, and I correct little flaws, and then re-upload it. So it's possible. Which one was it? Cause I don't see any missing photos.
Comments
Canon 50D, Rebel XTi,Canon 24-105L, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 28-75 2.8, 430EX
www.sbrownphotography.smugmug.com
my real job
looking for someone to photograph my wedding 8/11
Thanks.
And in response to your sig, don't. I've never done drugs, but I can only imagine the jonesing for camera equipment is just as bad as a physical addiction
I find myself hoping everytime I come home, that my dad has some gear he's looking to hand down to me
Caroline
Here's the original, straight out of camera.
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
My Photos
Thoughts on photographing a wedding, How to post a picture, AF Microadjustments?, Light Scoop
Equipment List - Check my profile
Here's the whole gallery
http://mnemosyne.smugmug.com/gallery/7226615_rbJEV#468347522_Dmv2k
I think I found it Scott. I updated to the newer image.