Macro Extension Tubes
eminart
Registered Users Posts: 49 Big grins
Somebody help me out. I'm fairly new to photography, and really new to macro. I shoot with a D80 and my macro lens is a Tokina 100mm f2.8. It's a true macro lens with 1:1 reproduction. However, like most macro enthusiasts, I want to get CLOSER! I figure the best way to do this without buying another lens is to get some extension tubes. Which ones are best? I know I want my lens to meter, so that cuts out all the cheapie $10 ones. I see a lot of different ones fromNikon, the most common is the PK-13 (I think) which is a 27.5mm extension. How much more magnification would that give me? I also see the Kenko set that contains three different lengths. Are those any good?
Anybody have any experience in this area? Or better yet, some sample photos of how much closer a given length would get me?
Anybody have any experience in this area? Or better yet, some sample photos of how much closer a given length would get me?
0
Comments
Website
Thanks! So, one good review for Kenko. Yeah, I'm not worried about autofocus. I never use autofocus on my macro lens. I just want to keep my metering.
I have read reports of the locking pins wearing out on the Kenko tubes, but I've had no problems with mine in nearly four years of use.
Bugs
Spiders
Flowers
Hope this helps.
OneTwoFiftieth | Portland, Oregon | Modern Portraiture
My Equipment:
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon EOS 1
Lenses: Canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 50mm f/1.4, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8
Lighting: Canon 580EXII, Canon 420 EX, 12" Reflector, Pocket Wizard Plus II (3), AB800 (3), Large Softbox
Stability: Manfrotto 190CXPRO3 Tripod, Manfrotto 488RC4 Ball Head, Manfrotto 679B Monopod
Brian V.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
I was under the impression that the tubes wouldn't change my working distance. In my simple mind, extending the lens from the camera would simply make the image larger on the sensor. Is that not the case? According to the posts in that link, the tubes just allow you to focus at closer distances.
If that is the case, I could save about $150 and just buy a reversing ring and hang my old 24mm lens off the end of my macro.
What is the advantage of the tubes over a reversing ring?
Haha, sorry. I was in the same boat.
This is true.
I have no idea on this one. The added benefits of the extension tubes is that if 100mm just isn't enough for your macro work, but you have a 400mm lens, you can attach the tubes to your 400mm, and now you have a 400mm macro (in a sense).
OneTwoFiftieth | Portland, Oregon | Modern Portraiture
My Equipment:
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon EOS 1
Lenses: Canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS, Canon 50mm f/1.4, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8
Lighting: Canon 580EXII, Canon 420 EX, 12" Reflector, Pocket Wizard Plus II (3), AB800 (3), Large Softbox
Stability: Manfrotto 190CXPRO3 Tripod, Manfrotto 488RC4 Ball Head, Manfrotto 679B Monopod
This is true to a point. With a reversing ring you are limited to the ring size and the two lenses. Let's say you put a 100mm and a 50mm together to get 1 inch away. That is all you will ever get.
With the tubes, you can put any lens on the tubes. You can use 1 tube to focus 12 inches away. 2 tubes put you 4 inches away. 3 tubes put you half an inch away. You can mix and match the tubes to get you as close as you want. Tons more versatile.
Website
I put the Kenkos into my shopping cart and was debating if I wanted them. I was purchasing an 85mm 1.8 and wanted to be able to do more with it than just indoor sports and portraits. The extension tubes would allow me to have more fun with my new lens.
Accessories make the hobby fun!
thanks to everyone that provided input to this thread.
Off to the Macro forum to learn!!
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Cr8ingWaves-Photography/119946782908?ref=ts