Operaton Rescue at Planned Parenthood (II)
On the second Saturday of each month, an antiabortion group, Operation Rescue, stages a protest at the Planned Parenthood clinic in Boston. I've shot this before, before, but I was never really satisfied. So here, without further comment is today's effort.
I'd love honest feedback on these as photography. Am I getting the intensity of the emotions present?
In the interest of full disclosure, I am personally a supporter of Planned Parenthood, and been so all my life. But let's leave the ethical discussion at that.
I'd love honest feedback on these as photography. Am I getting the intensity of the emotions present?
In the interest of full disclosure, I am personally a supporter of Planned Parenthood, and been so all my life. But let's leave the ethical discussion at that.
If not now, when?
0
Comments
Not a supporter of a lot of what Planned Parenthood does myself.....but a worthy cause photographically and good for you going out and capturing these shots.
Comments and constructive critique always welcome!
Elaine Heasley Photography
But the other three photos just seem kind of random. If you hadn't told me what you were shooting, I'd have no idea what photos 1 and 3 are all about. I think you need to work on the composition of these shots. They don't generate as much emotion or tension as they probably could given the setting. Also, some of the faces seem kind of muddled; I'd go for more sharpness and contrast.
I know you aren't posing these people, but try to find more interesting moments and more interesting ways to frame those moments. Also, watch out for lighting and try to get good contrast, good detail, or both.
. The others convey a lot of feeling, but they need some context to tell the story.
The context is there (the Planned Parenthood logo) in all but 2 if you look, but perhaps it has to be much less subtle.
I agree that 4 has the best potential of the group because of the juxtaposition of opposing messages. Looking at it now, I really wish I'd opened up the lens to blur that distracting background and bring more attention to the two subject.
It might work better (next time) to catch that person from the right separately and with the large sign in full view (in addition to the contrasting opinion version already posted).
As for making the background less noticeable, that can be fixed with a bit more PP, right?
The signage in #1 and #3 is too incomplete. If we weren't explicitly told the subject, the signs likely wouldn't register since they're only partially visible. As a viewer, I often tune out background signs (they're just visual litter in our daily landscape).
I have seen some funny signs but they're usually the focus of a pic and not so subtle that they can be easily missed.
I also think three as some potential. In closer analysis of the photograph I noticed the woman is holding a rosary along with the PP sign right above her. The man looking the opposite direction is distracting but what about cropping to just her. I think that could be even more powerful in a more subdued way. That allows the viewer to think more than having text lay it all out for them. As well as take a stand to who they agree more having the viewer interject their own feelings in an already heated topic. Just a thought.
I agree that from a photojournalist point-of-view the last is very strong and nicely represents non-aggressive but opposing view points which I think is always most powerful.
I looked at your earlier work and want to commend you on the choices you have made going forward... b/w versus colour, close crops to make it 'more personal' and appearing more engaged with the subject matter.
www.andreakollophotography.com
Andrea Kollo on Flickr