Poor man's macro: Ladybug
jax
Registered Users Posts: 143 Major grins
Finally saw something small moving in the garden. Well, to be honest.. my wife did.:D
Anyway, it gave me a chance to practice a little with my ultra-cheap macro setup, an old Canon FD lens (28 mm) and a reverse ring.
I used the pop-up flash and had a piece of paper stuck to the top of the flash which acted as a reflector. All though I had set FEC to -1, some area's where still blown...
Anyway, here are a few that turned out decent.
Anyway, it gave me a chance to practice a little with my ultra-cheap macro setup, an old Canon FD lens (28 mm) and a reverse ring.
I used the pop-up flash and had a piece of paper stuck to the top of the flash which acted as a reflector. All though I had set FEC to -1, some area's where still blown...
Anyway, here are a few that turned out decent.
0
Comments
Wow Jax ... your set up works really well
Photographing bugs with reflective bodies is a problem for anyone using a flash, you just have to find ways of diffusing it or toning it down
You've picked up lots of detail, your done really well with this new setup,
can't wait to see what you can produce with a little more practise
Well Done! .... Skippy
.
Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"
ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/
:skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
Whats the focus distance in front of the lens ?
Brian V.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
Brian, It is just a little over 2:1, according to the test shots I made of a ruler.
Focus distance is a bit of a problem yes , it is an inch or two. Fortunately this lady bug was a bit cold so she didn't move all that much.
phil
http://www.flickr.com/photos/goldenorfe/
moderator - Holy Macro
Goldenorfe’s Flickr Gallery
Goldenorfe photography on Smugmug
Phils Photographic Adventures Blog
Assuming, of course, that your "subject" would just stand still long enough for the shots you needed.
But we all know how the word "assume" breaks down, don't we?