viewing cameraphone pictures....

Zombie64

So.. for those of you lucky enough, as I am, to have a cameraphone.. there's a cool free site that just launched recently called snapnpost.com - It's pretty much like the rest of the moblogs out except that it has a lot of neat little features, like privacy functions (so you can control who views your gallery,) and an API feature (so you can host a satellite of the gallery on your on site..) Check it out.

wxwax

Cool, thanks Zombie. And welcome to dgrin! I haven't see a site like that before. Kinda fun. I'm beginning to understand the fun of having a camera on the telephone. The concept was lost on me before - all I could see was the telephone company making extra money off of long transmission times each time a photo was sent.

gus

sniff...sniff ...strong smell of tinned bully beef in the air.

wxwax

You're probably right. Let's see if Zombie makes a return.

gus

"Anyone who is lucky enough to have a camera phone" Id rather own an eel.


Have you seen the pics from one of them ? good for making stamps.

wxwax

True. But what I like is that you always have it on you. And so you're going to make a pic that you might not have made otherwise... capture a moment, a feeling, a look. Very spontaneous. That's when the content overcomes the style. I see shots like that in the galleries on the site, and that's what I like about it.

I do see a lot of bad image quality, vignetting, camera shake etc. I wonder if the quality of the cams will improve, or if that's not a priority for those involved.

lynnma

wxwax wrote:

True. But what I like is that you always have it on you. And so you're going to make a pic that you might not have made otherwise... capture a moment, a feeling, a look. Very spontaneous. That's when the content overcomes the style. I see shots like that in the galleries on the site, and that's what I like about it.

I do see a lot of bad image quality, vignetting, camera shake etc. I wonder if the quality of the cams will improve, or if that's not a priority for those involved.

well said Sid..

gus

I would still rather an eel....

wxwax

Quenda

I carry my camera everywhere I go, not looked at a camera phone, and not interested. I can't imagine you would ever get a decent photo from one. Ok for fun, I suppose, but I think as someone said, the carrier's are the winners on this one.


Q.

PS....Not too sure I would rather eat an eel though.....:D

gus

I be pattn' him matey...not eatin' him. Now if he were jellied...that'd be different.


Camera phones are for drunk chicks in nightclubs...

wxwax

Humungus wrote:

Camera phones are for drunk chicks in nightclubs...

Exactly!!!

GREAPER

A) there is absolutley NOTHING wrong with drunk chicks in a nightclub,

and

Eel aint that bad.

DoctorIt

GREAPER wrote:

A) there is absolutley NOTHING wrong with drunk chicks in a nightclub,

and

Eel aint that bad.

a) agreed

b) agreed. local sushi place has excellent eel rolls - nice sweet taste compliments the seaweed saltiness.

c) how bad can we hijack this thread?

gus

.