A critique of some of my photos

powepowe Registered Users Posts: 7 Beginner grinner
edited March 25, 2009 in People

Comments

  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited March 24, 2009
    powe wrote:
    You might do better off to pick four or five that you have specific questions on. But eight pages of pictures to ask for critiques on is a bit much.

    Two thoughts though. That first shot is over-exposed. Don't know if you hit it with too much flash or what but its too harsh. Second thought, if you delivered that many photos to your client for them to purchase from you delivered too much. They have too much to choose from and cause choice-paralysis. Find the best, prune the list, and only show the best.
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • jeffreaux2jeffreaux2 Registered Users Posts: 4,762 Major grins
    edited March 24, 2009
    Well....

    It's a lot of them.....too many to comment on specifically. Maybe if you chose a handful to post in a thread you would get a better response.


    I think the processing is much too strong on what I saw.
  • powepowe Registered Users Posts: 7 Beginner grinner
    edited March 24, 2009
    I'm sorry, I didn't mean I wanted you to critique all of them, just a general observation/critique overall or on a few that you choose.
    Thanks
  • QarikQarik Registered Users Posts: 4,959 Major grins
    edited March 24, 2009
    in general they are not bad... decently exposed, mostly in focus, okay colors. The cmposition is a bit lacking. Most shots sre just centered and lacking in interesting poses, angles, lighting, etc.

    Thats said..there are some decent shots in there but they get lost in the sea of repitition. You could literally throw away 80% of the shots and leave just the best/strongest and it would be leaner and mushc stronger collection. There are many repititous shots that are only different in negligible ways.
    D700, D600
    14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
    85 and 50 1.4
    45 PC and sb910 x2
    http://www.danielkimphotography.com
  • marikrismarikris Registered Users Posts: 930 Major grins
    edited March 24, 2009
    I liked your sepias, specially the one in the first page. I think the pp on a lot of them, like mentioned before, is a bit strong, resulting in very stark images. The black in some of them looks almost silvered, most noticeably in the hair.
  • kombizzkombizz Banned Posts: 267 Major grins
    edited March 25, 2009
    I just looked at few. It seems you needed to use diffuser.
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited March 25, 2009
    powe wrote:
    I'm sorry, I didn't mean I wanted you to critique all of them, just a general observation/critique overall or on a few that you choose.
    Thanks
    Understood. One, you have too many photos from one session to choose from. That goes either for us as critiquers, or for you clients trying to purchase prints. Pare down the photos from your session to the very best and nothing else. Get rid of multiple images that are close but slightly different.

    What kind of lighting did you use? Was it only ambient? Did you have any flashes or strobes?
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • powepowe Registered Users Posts: 7 Beginner grinner
    edited March 25, 2009
    mercphoto wrote:
    Understood. One, you have too many photos from one session to choose from. That goes either for us as critiquers, or for you clients trying to purchase prints. Pare down the photos from your session to the very best and nothing else. Get rid of multiple images that are close but slightly different.

    What kind of lighting did you use? Was it only ambient? Did you have any flashes or strobes?

    I used some ambient light and a Canon 430 EXII. It was an overcast day.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
    The couple (family friends) said they 'loved' them all, but I wanted to get some unbiased opinions. I didn't charge them. I put the pics on a CD for them.
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited March 25, 2009
    powe wrote:
    I used some ambient light and a Canon 430 EXII. It was an overcast day.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
    The couple (family friends) said they 'loved' them all, but I wanted to get some unbiased opinions. I didn't charge them. I put the pics on a CD for them.
    You might need to dial down the flash exposure. Dial in some negative FEC, maybe a full stop. Do you have a diffuser? How about a flash bracket to get the flash further away from the lens? Also, on overcast days a flash isn't as necessary as it is in full-sun, its possible you could have done with only ambient light.
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • SwartzySwartzy Registered Users Posts: 3,293 Major grins
    edited March 25, 2009
    Exposure is off and your backgrounds for the most part are brighter than your subjects. Some have focus issues. Photography is all about light. The light needs to highlight your subjects, making them the focal point. Keep shooting.
    Swartzy:
    NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
    Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
    www.daveswartz.com
    Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
Sign In or Register to comment.