Soccer

scarysharkfacescarysharkface Registered Users Posts: 87 Big grins
edited April 8, 2009 in Sports
Played around with shutter speed and other miscellanea yesterday at my son's soccer practice...

503751545_CgAf7-XL.jpg

503782424_iHGxW-XL.jpg

503798370_ZQDFz-XL.jpg

John

And yes, I'm an idiot for not putting this in Sports. I thought I had. <:P

Mod, please move this to the correct forum...
Canon EOS 50D, Tamron 18-270mm and 10-24mm

Comments

  • donekdonek Registered Users Posts: 655 Major grins
    edited April 2, 2009
    I'd turn the camera verticle and increase your shutter speed more. There's still motion blur on the later shots. Add a long lens and you'l really struggle. The horizon/ verticle is off on the last shot.
    Sean Martin
    www.seanmartinphoto.com

    __________________________________________________
    it's not the size of the lens that matters... It's how you focus it.

    aaaaa.... who am I kidding!

    whoever dies with the biggest coolest piece of glass, wins!
  • MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
    edited April 2, 2009
    I'm not sure what you mean by played around with your shutterspeed.

    What were you trying to accomplish? These just look blurry to me.
  • scarysharkfacescarysharkface Registered Users Posts: 87 Big grins
    edited April 3, 2009
    I wanted the blur so they didn't just look static. I'm really fond of the top one, which turned-out like I was hoping. I was trying for the longest useable exposure I could get. How might you approach this differently to still strongly imply motion? What I specifically want to avoid is tack-sharp frozen action. And thanks for the feedback (and please keep it coming)..

    John
    Canon EOS 50D, Tamron 18-270mm and 10-24mm
  • sportsshooter06sportsshooter06 Registered Users Posts: 194 Major grins
    edited April 3, 2009
    scarry person

    tack sharp is the answer

    good luck
  • scarysharkfacescarysharkface Registered Users Posts: 87 Big grins
    edited April 4, 2009
    scarry person

    tack sharp is the answer

    good luck


    502526175_pwuMN-XL-1.jpg

    Forgive me for disagreeing, but tack-sharp is definitely not the answer. Read my previous post. Perhaps "Sports" isn't where this belongs.

    John
    Canon EOS 50D, Tamron 18-270mm and 10-24mm
  • Ann McRaeAnn McRae Registered Users Posts: 4,584 Major grins
    edited April 4, 2009
    Maybe what you should give a try to is panning? Bicycle photogs do this frequently (and car photogs) and the result is to totally blur the background and following the player across a certain distance.

    I think you either want more blur or less, the amount here can be interpreted as an error, rather than a pleasant effect.

    I would also suggest cropping the first shot in portrait orientation, much tighter, open space in front of the player.

    Thanks for sharing. I have never tried panning, nor can I recall an example using soccer to point you to. Keep trying, and show us the results please.

    ann
  • scarysharkfacescarysharkface Registered Users Posts: 87 Big grins
    edited April 4, 2009
    Ann McRae wrote:
    Maybe what you should give a try to is panning? Bicycle photogs do this frequently (and car photogs) and the result is to totally blur the background and following the player across a certain distance.

    I think you either want more blur or less, the amount here can be interpreted as an error, rather than a pleasant effect.

    I would also suggest cropping the first shot in portrait orientation, much tighter, open space in front of the player.

    Thanks for sharing. I have never tried panning, nor can I recall an example using soccer to point you to. Keep trying, and show us the results please.

    ann

    Panning is definitely one thing that will help. The kids weren't moving terribly fast, as it was just them doing drills, so probably this might be easier at a match where they're really moving. Ultimately what I want is reasonably sharp faces and blurred appendages, which would require me developing panning skills and keeping shutter speeds slow. I'm not worried about framing so much at this point as much as finding a sweet-spot between panning, shutter speed and aperture that I can work with to get these things. Other people do this and I used to be pretty good at it with the old F1n and Tri-X back in the day, but it's been a long time (and a few career changes) since I've had an SLR up to my face..

    This is the first time I've shot (or tried shooting) sports with a still camera in probably 25 years!

    I'll keep experimenting as opportunities present themselves. If anybody has anything similar that works (or cares to experiment along with me), I'd appreciate hearing about it and seeing the results.

    Thank you!
    John
    Canon EOS 50D, Tamron 18-270mm and 10-24mm
  • SoonerShawnSoonerShawn Registered Users Posts: 128 Major grins
    edited April 4, 2009
    I understand what you are trying to do, the problems with the 1st image, assuming it turned out somewhat like what you wanted, are these: Your the image is severly over-exposed causing the harsh skin tones, and the blown whites. Also the image is tilted a little to the right.
  • scarysharkfacescarysharkface Registered Users Posts: 87 Big grins
    edited April 4, 2009
    I understand what you are trying to do, the problems with the 1st image, assuming it turned out somewhat like what you wanted, are these: Your the image is severly over-exposed causing the harsh skin tones, and the blown whites. Also the image is tilted a little to the right.

    Yes. Too much light is a bad thing (never thought I'd have THAT problem!). I don't think it's so much an exposure thing as it is a blur thing, since that kid has very light skin. Other shots at the same settings from that series aren't overexposed.

    Actually that shot's pretty close to level. The edge of the field isn't straight or level. Visually though, yes it looks wonky and at this point Generally speaking, I'm still fighting getting shots level through the viewfinder. I wear glasses and it's a struggle to see the edges of the frame sometimes. I've got to work on that.

    What range of shutter would you use for something like this? Also, image stabilization on or off? I had the camera's ISO cranked down to 100..

    I would really like to see how the rest of you folks would do what I'm trying to do. That would help considerably.

    Thanks,
    John
    Canon EOS 50D, Tamron 18-270mm and 10-24mm
  • tjk60tjk60 Registered Users Posts: 520 Major grins
    edited April 5, 2009
    John, while I agree with the others, ultimately it's up to you what you shoot. You definitely have an issue with the first shot and the face being grossly over exposed, it's way to hot. This will only become worse when it's the only 'focal' point of the shot.

    Panning is really the only way you are going to accomplish what you want, I think.

    Get positioned so that you are parallel to the player, and pan with them. Meter off their face, for people (especially young ones) you'll need a very slow shutter, and in bright sun your camera may be maxed out even at the lowest ISO. if so, look for a ND filter, or depending on the sun position, a CP could work.

    Practice your panning on cars in slower neighborhoods...

    Also nail the exposure on the faces to improve the overall look of your pics, it's all about the faces...
    Tim
    Troy, MI

    D700/200, SB800(4), 70-200, 300 2.8 and a few more

    www.sportsshooter.com/tjk60
  • scarysharkfacescarysharkface Registered Users Posts: 87 Big grins
    edited April 5, 2009
    tjk60 wrote:
    John, while I agree with the others, ultimately it's up to you what you shoot. You definitely have an issue with the first shot and the face being grossly over exposed, it's way to hot. This will only become worse when it's the only 'focal' point of the shot.

    Panning is really the only way you are going to accomplish what you want, I think.

    Get positioned so that you are parallel to the player, and pan with them. Meter off their face, for people (especially young ones) you'll need a very slow shutter, and in bright sun your camera may be maxed out even at the lowest ISO. if so, look for a ND filter, or depending on the sun position, a CP could work.

    Practice your panning on cars in slower neighborhoods...

    Also nail the exposure on the faces to improve the overall look of your pics, it's all about the faces...

    Thank you.

    Which neutral density filter(s) would you recommend? Also, I'm guessing an ND filter might mess with the autofocus (in general terms) but that it shouldn't be an issue with lots of light?

    What is a CP?

    In terms of exposure, is it best to under-expose a bit (one stop, perhaps) as a rule to avoid blowing out highlights?

    Again, thanks for the info.

    john
    Canon EOS 50D, Tamron 18-270mm and 10-24mm
  • z28kenz28ken Registered Users Posts: 9 Beginner grinner
    edited April 7, 2009
    CP = Circular Polarizer
  • scarysharkfacescarysharkface Registered Users Posts: 87 Big grins
    edited April 8, 2009
    z28ken wrote:
    CP = Circular Polarizer

    thumb.gif Thanks.

    John
    Canon EOS 50D, Tamron 18-270mm and 10-24mm
  • SeefutlungSeefutlung Registered Users Posts: 2,781 Major grins
    edited April 8, 2009
    Hey, having shot a ton of sports ... i like what you did with the blur. #1 has too much blur, #2 and #3 are better. Unfortunately, not enough isolation of the players makes the images sub-par ... but this was just practice for you and the team. I'd try it again wide open with a longer lens for isolation ... minimize handshake with IS (if you got it) and a monopod (if you got one). You could try getting really creative by going with a very slow shutter and giving the camera a quick circular twist at the moment of shutter release while panning with the player (not an easy task). (This technique gives those circular streaks on the edges of the frame while the center is reasonably sharp.)

    tjk60 is on-the-money with his follow-up recommendations.

    Gary
    My snaps can be found here:
    Unsharp at any Speed
  • scarysharkfacescarysharkface Registered Users Posts: 87 Big grins
    edited April 8, 2009
    Seefutlung wrote:
    Hey, having shot a ton of sports ... i like what you did with the blur. #1 has too much blur, #2 and #3 are better. Unfortunately, not enough isolation of the players makes the images sub-par ... but this was just practice for you and the team. I'd try it again wide open with a longer lens for isolation ... minimize handshake with IS (if you got it) and a monopod (if you got one). You could try getting really creative by going with a very slow shutter and giving the camera a quick circular twist at the moment of shutter release while panning with the player (not an easy task). (This technique gives those circular streaks on the edges of the frame while the center is reasonably sharp.)

    tjk60 is on-the-money with his follow-up recommendations.

    Gary

    Cool. Thanks greatly!

    John
    Canon EOS 50D, Tamron 18-270mm and 10-24mm
Sign In or Register to comment.