Soccer
scarysharkface
Registered Users Posts: 87 Big grins
Played around with shutter speed and other miscellanea yesterday at my son's soccer practice...
John
And yes, I'm an idiot for not putting this in Sports. I thought I had. <:P
Mod, please move this to the correct forum...
John
And yes, I'm an idiot for not putting this in Sports. I thought I had. <:P
Mod, please move this to the correct forum...
Canon EOS 50D, Tamron 18-270mm and 10-24mm
0
Comments
www.seanmartinphoto.com
__________________________________________________
it's not the size of the lens that matters... It's how you focus it.
aaaaa.... who am I kidding!
whoever dies with the biggest coolest piece of glass, wins!
What were you trying to accomplish? These just look blurry to me.
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
John
tack sharp is the answer
good luck
Forgive me for disagreeing, but tack-sharp is definitely not the answer. Read my previous post. Perhaps "Sports" isn't where this belongs.
John
I think you either want more blur or less, the amount here can be interpreted as an error, rather than a pleasant effect.
I would also suggest cropping the first shot in portrait orientation, much tighter, open space in front of the player.
Thanks for sharing. I have never tried panning, nor can I recall an example using soccer to point you to. Keep trying, and show us the results please.
ann
My Galleries My Photography BLOG
Ramblings About Me
Panning is definitely one thing that will help. The kids weren't moving terribly fast, as it was just them doing drills, so probably this might be easier at a match where they're really moving. Ultimately what I want is reasonably sharp faces and blurred appendages, which would require me developing panning skills and keeping shutter speeds slow. I'm not worried about framing so much at this point as much as finding a sweet-spot between panning, shutter speed and aperture that I can work with to get these things. Other people do this and I used to be pretty good at it with the old F1n and Tri-X back in the day, but it's been a long time (and a few career changes) since I've had an SLR up to my face..
This is the first time I've shot (or tried shooting) sports with a still camera in probably 25 years!
I'll keep experimenting as opportunities present themselves. If anybody has anything similar that works (or cares to experiment along with me), I'd appreciate hearing about it and seeing the results.
Thank you!
John
Yes. Too much light is a bad thing (never thought I'd have THAT problem!). I don't think it's so much an exposure thing as it is a blur thing, since that kid has very light skin. Other shots at the same settings from that series aren't overexposed.
Actually that shot's pretty close to level. The edge of the field isn't straight or level. Visually though, yes it looks wonky and at this point Generally speaking, I'm still fighting getting shots level through the viewfinder. I wear glasses and it's a struggle to see the edges of the frame sometimes. I've got to work on that.
What range of shutter would you use for something like this? Also, image stabilization on or off? I had the camera's ISO cranked down to 100..
I would really like to see how the rest of you folks would do what I'm trying to do. That would help considerably.
Thanks,
John
Panning is really the only way you are going to accomplish what you want, I think.
Get positioned so that you are parallel to the player, and pan with them. Meter off their face, for people (especially young ones) you'll need a very slow shutter, and in bright sun your camera may be maxed out even at the lowest ISO. if so, look for a ND filter, or depending on the sun position, a CP could work.
Practice your panning on cars in slower neighborhoods...
Also nail the exposure on the faces to improve the overall look of your pics, it's all about the faces...
Troy, MI
D700/200, SB800(4), 70-200, 300 2.8 and a few more
www.sportsshooter.com/tjk60
Thank you.
Which neutral density filter(s) would you recommend? Also, I'm guessing an ND filter might mess with the autofocus (in general terms) but that it shouldn't be an issue with lots of light?
What is a CP?
In terms of exposure, is it best to under-expose a bit (one stop, perhaps) as a rule to avoid blowing out highlights?
Again, thanks for the info.
john
Thanks.
John
tjk60 is on-the-money with his follow-up recommendations.
Gary
Unsharp at any Speed
Cool. Thanks greatly!
John