fun with the studio B800 lights still learning
Having fun with the studio B800 lights still learning. These are just a few of my daughter friend Chelsea CC welcome I will post more later just got a few done
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
5D mark II, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8 L IS
EF 2.0x II extender BG-E6
EF 2.0x II extender BG-E6
0
Comments
All that having been said, the lighting is a bit flat.
Something to remember, soft shadows can be a goodness. At times, and depending on the application/situation even hard shadows can be good.
To get some shadows here, just turn down one of your lights about a stop. This light, then, will be your fill and the other (brighter) light will by your key. With the setup you have here, you'll get some nice defining shadows on her face. I think I would dial down the light on camera left and raise the light on camera right a little higher off the ground.
Just my $.02
My Photos
Thoughts on photographing a wedding, How to post a picture, AF Microadjustments?, Light Scoop
Equipment List - Check my profile
I have to agree that your lighting looks very even an flat. I see two lights here, what were your ratios?
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
I did shoot these with an even number on each side it was f9 I think and the back ground
was at f11 shutter at 200 iso100 but I thought hi key was supposed to have no shadows?
EF 2.0x II extender BG-E6
Yes, you need more lights for what I'm suggesting.
Or, you can just go ahead and light the model with a ratio to produce good modeling on her face. If you get some shadows on the white background, who cares. Nobody is going to notice with such a beautiful subject!
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
EF 2.0x II extender BG-E6
EF 2.0x II extender BG-E6
.DAVID.
Take nothing but pictures. Leave nothing but footprints
Just one question...how close were you to your model. I look at number 4 and see that her head seems a bit small for her body...a sign that usually indicates the photographer was too close. Maybe it's just the pose.
If you look at 3 and 5 by comparison, you will see that her head looks more appropriate for her body.
Something else that I think you did right in number 5 is to lengthen her legs with the heals. I think it's the best leg shot in the series.
Your "got one more" seems to support my thoughts on your being too close. Look at the size of her hand on her hip...and how her head sort of seems to drop back...being on the small side. Her hand also adds to the waist line...not good. Look at number 5 as a reference...ratio wise you can see she is much more proportional.
Proportionally, she looks like a different person in the last photo than in the previous three. In five she looks slim...in the others that I have mentioned, she looks a little thick...by comparison..
Just offering my humble opinion...
Educate yourself like you'll live forever and live like you'll die tomorrow.
Ed
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
Very nice photos, I especially like #1
Portland, Oregon Photographer Pete Springer
website blog instagram facebook g+
You can improve these shots a lot with a little post work:
See this and that.
EF 2.0x II extender BG-E6
And I just got CS4 and still learning this. But I”m learning, there is so much to this stuff WOW never knew
EF 2.0x II extender BG-E6
I provided the links: this and that.
Shooting from a higher angle will make your subject look shorter. Shooting from a lower angle is what makes them look taller. Just don't overdo it, or their lower bodies will look disproportionately large.
http://blog.timkphotography.com