Forgotten Sunset
Kilo
Registered Users Posts: 210 Major grins
This was taken in the spring or summer of 2005 when I use to shoot with my Nikon N75/Sigma lens set at 90mm.
I had forgotten about this photo, and then I was looking through several 4x6 prints that I have, then I saw this, and then I looked for it on disc.
Sorry about the cables and transistors. I know they can be distracting, but I couldn't find a better place to stand at the moment, but at least the sun came out pretty good, (no sun or lens flare/glare either). Also, there isn't much of anything to take pictures of around here except for sunsets or sunrises.
I had forgotten about this photo, and then I was looking through several 4x6 prints that I have, then I saw this, and then I looked for it on disc.
Sorry about the cables and transistors. I know they can be distracting, but I couldn't find a better place to stand at the moment, but at least the sun came out pretty good, (no sun or lens flare/glare either). Also, there isn't much of anything to take pictures of around here except for sunsets or sunrises.
ʞ1└0
0
Comments
Shots like this have great potential, and I think to get the best of the situation you need to have a compelling shape to the silhouette. The wires don't bother me as much as the amorphous hole created by the trees. If you get a chance to shoot something like this again this year keep an eye peeled for the shapes! The color and light will work all by themselves.
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
When it was printed on 4x6 and burned to a disc at WalMart, it didn't look too good. It looked over-exposed. Some think it was them and their technology, I think it was just me not knowing (and still not knowing ) how to set the settings in my Nikon N75, (nor my Canon 30D).
I had to edit it a little in Nikon's Capture NX2 to get the color that I saw, not what the camera saw, which all I needed to due was lower the exposure. The original photo's color was about 7 shades lighter. I might print it myself someday on a 4x6 matte or gloss.
Thank again! :-)
When it was printed on 4x6 and burned to a disc at WalMart, it didn't look too good. It looked over-exposed. Some think it was them and their technology, I think it was just me not knowing (and still not knowing ) how to set the settings in my Nikon N75, (nor my Canon 30D).
I had to edit it a little in Nikon's Capture NX2 to get the color that I saw, not what the camera saw, which all I needed to due was lowe the exposure some. The original photo's color was about 7 shades lighter. I might print it myself sometime on a 4x6 matte or gloss.
Thank again! :-)