18-200 Tamron

karuzokaruzo Registered Users Posts: 23 Big grins
edited June 6, 2005 in Cameras
Hello all,
Is anyone familier with this new lens? Is it a good quality lens through out zoom range?
Thanks,
Karuzo
Thanks,
karuzo
http://karuzo.smugmug.com
'Good photographers never die, they just get replaced'

Comments

  • davevdavev Registered Users Posts: 3,118 Major grins
    edited June 5, 2005
    karuzo wrote:
    Hello all,
    Is anyone familier with this new lens? Is it a good quality lens through out zoom range?
    Thanks,
    Karuzo

    Hi Karuzo.
    I have this lens. I would rate it about a 6 or 7 for picture quality,
    but I really like it for a walk around lens. If you want, I have a gallery here:
    http://www.pbase.com/davev/18200

    If you don't need the extra reach, of the extra wide angle, the canon
    28-135is IMO will give you a better final picture. I have galleries here:
    http://www.pbase.com/davev/weekend1
    http://www.pbase.com/davev/weekend_trip

    You'll have to look for what lens did what in these galleries.

    Hope this helps.

    dave.
    dave.

    Basking in the shadows of yesterday's triumphs'.
  • karuzokaruzo Registered Users Posts: 23 Big grins
    edited June 5, 2005
    Thanks
    davev wrote:
    Hi Karuzo.
    I have this lens. I would rate it about a 6 or 7 for picture quality,
    but I really like it for a walk around lens. If you want, I have a gallery here:
    http://www.pbase.com/davev/18200

    If you don't need the extra reach, of the extra wide angle, the canon
    28-135is IMO will give you a better final picture. I have galleries here:
    http://www.pbase.com/davev/weekend1
    http://www.pbase.com/davev/weekend_trip

    You'll have to look for what lens did what in these galleries.

    Hope this helps.

    dave.
    Thanks. Nice pictures. I probably will get a 17-35 first as this will be handy with flash photography, and then the 18-200.
    Thanks,
    karuzo
    Thanks,
    karuzo
    http://karuzo.smugmug.com
    'Good photographers never die, they just get replaced'
  • davevdavev Registered Users Posts: 3,118 Major grins
    edited June 5, 2005
    karuzo wrote:
    Thanks. Nice pictures. I probably will get a 17-35 first as this will be handy with flash photography, and then the 18-200.
    Thanks,
    karuzo
    Don't forget that Sigma has an 18-200 lens also. Some of the pics that I've seen
    appear to be sharper than my Tamron. If you have the time before you buy,
    be sure to read reviews on both of these lenses.

    dave.
    dave.

    Basking in the shadows of yesterday's triumphs'.
  • jthomasjthomas Registered Users Posts: 454 Major grins
    edited June 6, 2005
    davev wrote:
    Don't forget that Sigma has an 18-200 lens also. Some of the pics that I've seen
    appear to be sharper than my Tamron. If you have the time before you buy,
    be sure to read reviews on both of these lenses.

    dave.
    That Sigma lens looks interesting, but I can't find any reviews. Anyone seen one ?
  • davevdavev Registered Users Posts: 3,118 Major grins
    edited June 6, 2005
    jthomas wrote:
    That Sigma lens looks interesting, but I can't find any reviews. Anyone seen one ?
    I guess I haven't read any "pro" reviews. But on Dpreview in the canon
    lens forum, there are more than a few threads talking about the Sigma and
    Tamron 18-200 lenses.

    A link to the forum:

    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1029

    use the search and type in 18-200, lots of stuff will come up.


    dave.
    dave.

    Basking in the shadows of yesterday's triumphs'.
Sign In or Register to comment.