U12 baseball

tjk60tjk60 Registered Users Posts: 520 Major grins
edited May 11, 2009 in Sports
1
530689899_PJrK4-O.jpg

2 waiting for the throw
530689950_tm4sE-O.jpg

3 Pickle....
530689904_uTen3-O.jpg

4 Looks good here, but just another e-6
530689913_GGDkv-O.jpg

5) D60 and a 180 macro lens from the home team
530689921_8SELj-O.jpg

6 Safe ... but ugly!
530689928_rX7XX-O.jpg

7 BOB that barely missed me....
530689934_Qwjt6-O.jpg

8) one of several pitchers, he turned out to be the sacrificial lamb and took the loss
530689944_KPmFu-O.jpg
Tim
Troy, MI

D700/200, SB800(4), 70-200, 300 2.8 and a few more

www.sportsshooter.com/tjk60

Comments

  • zack75144zack75144 Registered Users Posts: 261 Major grins
    edited May 8, 2009
    Allow me to step out on a limb here.
    IMO I think your shots look superb. Sharp, great great exposure, but something isn't right for me. The background is SO blurred out it almost seems surreal or dream like. Is this a natural effect or done in PP?

    Too much or just right ,I don't know. Maybe others will chime in on this.

    Regards,
    Zack
    Zack www.zackjonesphotography.net
    EOS 7D, Zeiss 50mm f/1.4, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 200mm f/2.8L II, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF 1.4 Ext II, 430EX, ST-E2, Tamrac Velocity 10X & Expeditioner 7 Bags.
  • tjk60tjk60 Registered Users Posts: 520 Major grins
    edited May 9, 2009
    zack75144 wrote:
    Allow me to step out on a limb here.
    IMO I think your shots look superb. Sharp, great great exposure, but something isn't right for me. The background is SO blurred out it almost seems surreal or dream like. Is this a natural effect or done in PP?

    Too much or just right ,I don't know. Maybe others will chime in on this.

    Regards,
    Zack

    Thanks Zack, and I assure you, total natural. Al in this set are with D700/300 2.8 lens, and a few have the 1.4TC added. The field the kids were on had no fence in the outfield until you got to the next fields dugouts, probably 700-800' away.

    I'm not good enough at post (and have way to many pics to process) to alter these :D:D:D
    Tim
    Troy, MI

    D700/200, SB800(4), 70-200, 300 2.8 and a few more

    www.sportsshooter.com/tjk60
  • WayzataWayzata Registered Users Posts: 11 Big grins
    edited May 9, 2009
    tjk60 wrote:
    Thanks Zack, and I assure you, total natural. Al in this set are with D700/300 2.8 lens, and a few have the 1.4TC added. The field the kids were on had no fence in the outfield until you got to the next fields dugouts, probably 700-800' away.

    I'm not good enough at post (and have way to many pics to process) to alter these :D:D:D


    these are excellent shots!!!

    those big lenses really are worth what they cost.
  • zack75144zack75144 Registered Users Posts: 261 Major grins
    edited May 9, 2009
    zack75144 wrote:
    IMO I think your shots look superb.

    I guess I'm not used to bokeh that silky smoothclap.gif
    Zack www.zackjonesphotography.net
    EOS 7D, Zeiss 50mm f/1.4, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 200mm f/2.8L II, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF 1.4 Ext II, 430EX, ST-E2, Tamrac Velocity 10X & Expeditioner 7 Bags.
  • tjk60tjk60 Registered Users Posts: 520 Major grins
    edited May 10, 2009
    zack75144 wrote:
    I guess I'm not used to bokeh that silky smoothclap.gif

    thx, believe me the lens (me) takes some cr@ppy ones too!
    Tim
    Troy, MI

    D700/200, SB800(4), 70-200, 300 2.8 and a few more

    www.sportsshooter.com/tjk60
  • SledhedSledhed Registered Users Posts: 79 Big grins
    edited May 10, 2009
    Excellent!
    Chris

    Website

    Sports Sample Photos

    Sportsshooter.com/ctproctor

    Four Seam Images
  • tjk60tjk60 Registered Users Posts: 520 Major grins
    edited May 11, 2009
    Sledhed wrote:
    Excellent!

    thx!
    Tim
    Troy, MI

    D700/200, SB800(4), 70-200, 300 2.8 and a few more

    www.sportsshooter.com/tjk60
Sign In or Register to comment.