Sigma 150-500mm os f5/6.3 lens
Hi everyone, This is my first posting I would like to ask for help please I am thinking of adding this lens to my other kit i have a nikon d80 , should i go ahead and buy! opinions most welcome, my thanks in addvance, ( TOMCAT10).
0
Comments
this lens would be a good addition to any kit especially for a wildlife photog on a crop body......it may not be super shrp on the edges with a FX body but with a DX it should be fantastic.......
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=+site%3Awww.dgrin.com+%2Bsigma+%2B%22150-500%22&fp=0_TDBcSQxa0
Here are some PBase samples:
http://www.pbase.com/lightrules/bigmos
http://www.pbase.com/eastkent64/sigma_150500mm
http://www.pbase.com/dadas115/sig150500
Note that the Sigma 150-500mm, F5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO lacks the "EX" designation that Sigma uses for its best line of lenses, but in this case I think it is mostly a build quality issue. Optically, the lens seems very capable.
I use the Sigma "Bigma" 50-500mm, F4-6.3 EX HSM APO (mine is prior to the current "DG" version) and the image quality is very good. I am especially impressed with the lens on the Canon 5D MKII.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Keep in mind that these big lenses require quite a bit of light and are usually sharpest in the F8 to F9 range.
They are also very heavy and take a toll when shooting hand held. Your tripod and head also have to be able to support the weight.
Website
Like most of these style zooms, I think it is better used between 150-400, and is softer at 500. But these lenses are rarely used at anything less than 500 ( at least that is how I end up using it ) It is soft wide open, but at f8 or f9 it is better, and capable if used carefully - that is to say, on a good tripod. I do not recommend shooting it wide open - Mine is not L glass, but it is handy just the same.
This was captured handheld at f9 1/2500th ISO 200 on a 5D at 198mm focal length
Since getting home from Yellowstone, I have played with adjusting the micro focus for this lens on my 50D and I think it will do a bit better at 500mm now. I'll report on that when I have a firmer opinion about it.
It is not as sharp as a Canon 500 f4 IS L - of that I am certain, but it is easier to carry ready to shoot as you walk in a snow field, and will be easier to carry on an airplane. It still requires all the good shooting technique that all long glass needs.
There are other images with this lens in this gallery You will have to check the exif to verify that it was this lens - If it was 500mm it was this Sigma lens. I have a number of images shot with a Canon 300 + 2xtc that will be tagged as 600mm so don't confuse the two.
Please, don't look at that gallery without leaving a comment so I know you were there.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Ziggy, I believe that the build quality of the 150-500mm lens is "EX" however Sigma has changed their lens designation. Any new lens has to have a constant aperture in order to be lableled as "EX". Older lenses that are still produced retain their "EX" designation even tough they don't have a constant aperture like the 50-500mm.
I've also used it on a monopod with good results.
It is, of course, not an everyday walking around lens. But it adds very useful capabilities to my kit.
Les
Good choice.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Les, welcome to the Digital Grin.
Thanks for your assessment of the lens. Any images you would like to share?
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Have you checked out this thread?:
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=39768
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums