keeper or toss?
joshhuntnm
Registered Users Posts: 1,924 Major grins
I couldn't see the folds in the curtain were creating weird lines till I got it on a big screen. Bummer I would have like this shot. What do you think? Keep it or toss it?
0
Comments
Website
My Smugmug
My Canon Gear:
5DMII | 24-105mm f/4L | 45mm TS/E | 135mm f/2.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | 50mm f/1.4 | 580EX II & 430EX
Each person views things differently.
For me that would be a toss.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
:cry I'd have to say toss, too. Her expression is pleasing and the dress detail is nice, but the disembodied ear and the skunk stripe on her forehead (as well as the very bright highlight falling on the corner of her left eye) are distracting.
Educate yourself like you'll live forever and live like you'll die tomorrow.
Ed
Toss that sucka. (though I don't dislike it for the reasons those above me said -- for me it's all about the weird brighter line across her face)
Here is a wedding website I created for a customer as a value-add. Comments appreciated.
Founding member of The Professional Photography Forum as well.
I tend to err the other way--it costs nothing to give them the pic. On the off chance she likes it, she has it; otherwise she can toss it.
It was a learning experience -- straighten out the curtains!! (that is what is causing the lines.
Las Cruces Photographer / Las Cruces Wedding Photographer
Other site
Comments and constructive critique always welcome!
Elaine Heasley Photography
I have to agree with federer..if you are unsure then it is a toss. But my threshold is rather high. I woudl rather give clients much fewer photos of greater quality. My thought is a few bad photos can really take the punch out of continuity of a set...though sometimes you can't help it if it is the only shot of a particular setting or person, etc.
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
You are a great photographer, and have a much better experience range then I in the wedding arena. With that being said, I'm going to disagree with you on the statement "it costs nothing to give it to them" as I stated above it is (or should be) your decision, if you give them your shots thinking "eh if she doesn't like it then she can toss it" you might as well give her the lot and let her cull them, essentially there is no difference. If you like the shot and feel it is worthy of presenting then you should at least hope that she likes it.
my opinion on the shot,
I agree with Andy, with the addition of the head is turned slightly too much to the right, so the clipping in the right eye kinda makes a jagged cut in the face
Keith Tharp.com - Champion Photo
If she doesn't like it, she doesn't have to buy it.
GG
I do the same thing, this is why when I shoot weddings I can't do what some people do and only give the "top 300" shots from the whole day... if it's junk it gets tossed, if it might have value to them or something I think is "different" it stays.
That being said, I like that this is "different" and I'd keep it.
Facebook: Friend / Fan || Twitter: @shimamizu || Google Plus
As for this statements ....
This is just flat wrong. In business, there are many liabilitis, cost, and assessts. One asset you have is your reputation - For a photographer, this might be lumped with portfolio. Basically, if a client sees some of you work that is not up to your usual standard, it's the poorer shots that they will remember and talk about. That will, eventually, impact on your business.
My Photos
Thoughts on photographing a wedding, How to post a picture, AF Microadjustments?, Light Scoop
Equipment List - Check my profile
This is very true.
Some people tend to fixate on the negatives. An otherwise great set of photos could be remembered as the bridal shot that got ruined by crazy shadows.
I like to present only my best.
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/