First shot cull out - its not too bad but the second shot is better. You have no detail on the lower half of the heron's body. The colors are lifeless and washed out
Second shot - a keeper - the colors and detail are better. The background is nicely blurred. The eye is clear and sharp. You have good feather detail. This is a much stronger capture than the first.
You did pretty good on both shots considering the lousy light you had.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
First shot cull out - its not too bad but the second shot is better. You have no detail on the lower half of the heron's body. The colors are lifeless and washed out
Second shot - a keeper - the colors and detail are better. The background is nicely blurred. The eye is clear and sharp. You have good feather detail. This is a much stronger capture than the first.
You did pretty good on both shots considering the lousy light you had.
thank Harry would have big D them but worked on them for therapy .the dif in the two shots is distance and i tried to bring out detail in PS
Comments
“PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”
http://jwear.smugmug.com/
Second shot - a keeper - the colors and detail are better. The background is nicely blurred. The eye is clear and sharp. You have good feather detail. This is a much stronger capture than the first.
You did pretty good on both shots considering the lousy light you had.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Harry said it all
My Galleries
Flicker
G+
“PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”
http://jwear.smugmug.com/