Do you use the 450D (Xsi) and just how good is it?
Paul Iddon
Registered Users Posts: 5,129 Major grins
I'm getting one soon to replace the older 400D and would like some thoughts.
I have read the reviews online and seen many images taken with it on forums, but what do you think of yours?
What is its good points, and what lets it down?
Paul.
I have read the reviews online and seen many images taken with it on forums, but what do you think of yours?
What is its good points, and what lets it down?
Paul.
0
Comments
Bob Atkins has a great review and comparison between the XTi, Xsi and 40D:
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/digital/canon_eos_xsi_vs_xti_vs_40D.html
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
I had originally expected/planned to go to a 40D, but when I had the chance to handle both, the smaller, lighter xsi felt so much better to me that it was a no-brainer. The processor and many of the features are the same as the 40D - I think of it as a "40D lite" in many ways.
The only genuine negative I have about it is that if you underexpose, the shot can get noisy; once you know that, however, you can usually avoid it as a problem and with something like noiseware I've even been able to turn low light ISO1600 shots into useable images.
Overall, I'm very VERY happy with it - I dread my next upgrade, and only hope that Canon has something I'll want other than the 5dmkII, because from my vantage point the xsi does everything I want in a camera and more.
Pros
lightweight/smaller than prosumer series which for me is easier to hold
price
gorgeous, easy-to-read LCD screen
great menu setup
spot metering
excellent AF performance
Live view
Cons
at 800 and higher ISO and/or if underexposed exhibits more noise than some
plastic body may not be as robust as prosumer line (although I've had no problems of any kind with build-quality - it's been great)