California courts

mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
edited August 25, 2005 in The Big Picture
This seals it for me. Jackson not guilty of everything? California has Disneyland handling their court system.
Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu

Comments

  • blackwaterstudioblackwaterstudio Registered Users Posts: 779 Major grins
    edited June 13, 2005
    The time will come when he has to answer for what he did, just like people that get off for rape, murder, etc. There is always a higher being that they are gonna have to answer to.
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited June 13, 2005
    The time will come when he has to answer for what he did, just like people that get off for rape, murder, etc. There is always a higher being that they are gonna have to answer to.

    No disrepect, but a view like that does little to solve the problem of a poor criminal justice system. "Oh well, they'll pay, sometime... somewhere..."

    In my belief system, the courts are the highest power anyone answers to. And he's off. Best I can hope for now is nobody buys his albums, music, books. That nobody buys any books written by jurors (and you just know some jurors are going to try to get rich off this).
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • ChrisJChrisJ Registered Users Posts: 2,164 Major grins
    edited June 13, 2005
    As much as I think MJ is really weird, that doesn't make him guilty. Especially with the gold-digger accusations, I could see a lot of reasonable doubt creeping into the jury.

    Just sad to see a former great performer fall onto the crazy train. :crazy
    Chris
  • blackwaterstudioblackwaterstudio Registered Users Posts: 779 Major grins
    edited June 13, 2005
    mercphoto wrote:
    No disrepect, but a view like that does little to solve the problem of a poor criminal justice system. "Oh well, they'll pay, sometime... somewhere..."

    In my belief system, the courts are the highest power anyone answers to. And he's off. Best I can hope for now is nobody buys his albums, music, books. That nobody buys any books written by jurors (and you just know some jurors are going to try to get rich off this).
    Being a police officer myself and watching courts I have no faith in them. The fact of the matter is they will never change not in our life time and probably never.

    Even if they found him guilty, prison would be a cake walk to where he's going when he meets his maker.
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited June 13, 2005
    damn juries always get it wrong
    January 20 Nine-year-old Elizabeth Parris and eleven-year-old Abigail Williams began to exhibit strange behavior, such as blasphemous screaming, convulsive seizures, trance-like states and mysterious spells. Within a short time, several other Salem girls began to demonstrate similar behavior. Mid-February Unable to determine any physical cause for the symptoms and dreadful behavior, physicians concluded that the girls were under the influence of Satan. Late February Prayer services and community fasting were conducted by Reverend Samuel Parris in hopes of relieving the evil forces that plagued them. In an effort to expose the "witches", John Indian baked a witch cake made with rye meal and the afflicted girls' urine. This counter-magic was meant to reveal the identities of the "witches" to the afflicted girls. Pressured to identify the source of their affliction, the girls named three women, including Tituba, Parris' Carib Indian slave, as witches. On February 29, warrants were issued for the arrests of Tituba, Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne.

    Although Osborne and Good maintained innocence, Tituba confessed to seeing the devil who appeared to her "sometimes like a hog and sometimes like a great dog". What's more, Tituba testified that there was a conspiracy of witches at work in Salem.

    March 1 Magistrates John Hathorne and Jonathan Corwin examined Tituba, Sarah Good, and Sarah Osborne in the meeting house in Salem Village. Tituba confessed to practicing witchcraft. Over the next weeks, other townspeople came forward and testified that they, too, had been harmed by or had seen strange apparitions of some of the community members. As the witch hunt continued, accusations were made against many different people.

    Frequently denounced were women whose behavior or economic circumstances were somehow disturbing to the social order and conventions of the time. Some of the accused had previous records of criminal activity, including witchcraft, but others were faithful churchgoers and people of high standing in the community.

    March 12 Martha Corey is accused of witchcraft. March 19 Rebecca Nurse was denounced as a witch. March 21 Martha Corey was examined before Magistrates Hathorne and Corwin. March 24 Rebecca Nurse was examined before Magistrates Hathorne and Corwin. March 28 Elizabeth Proctor was denounced as a witch. April 3 Sarah Cloyce, Rebecca Nurse's sister, was accused of witchcraft. April 11 Elizabeth Proctor and Sarah Cloyce were examined before Hathorne, Corwin, Deputy Governor Thomas Danforth, and Captain Samuel Sewall. During this examination, John Proctor was also accused and imprisoned. April 19 Abigail Hobbs, Bridget Bishop, Giles Corey, and Mary Warren were examined. Only Abigail Hobbs confessed. William Hobbs
    "I can deny it to my dying day."

    April 22 Nehemiah Abbott, William and Deliverance Hobbs, Edward and Sarah Bishop, Mary Easty, Mary Black, Sarah Wildes, and Mary English were examined before Hathorne and Corwin. Only Nehemiah Abbott was cleared of charges. May 2 Sarah Morey, Lydia Dustin, Susannah Martin, and Dorcas Hoar were examined by Hathorne and Corwin. Dorcas Hoar
    "I will speak the truth as long as I live."

    May 4 George Burroughs was arrested in Wells, Maine. May 9 Burroughs was examined by Hathorne, Corwin, Sewall, and William Stoughton. One of the afflicted girls, Sarah Churchill, was also examined. May 10 George Jacobs, Sr. and his granddaughter Margaret were examined before Hathorne and Corwin. Margaret confessed and testified that her grandfather and George Burroughs were both witches. Sarah Osborne died in prison in Boston.

    Margaret Jacobs
    "... They told me if I would not confess I should be put down into the dungeon and would be hanged, but if I would confess I should save my life."

    May 14 Increase Mather returned from England, bringing with him a new charter and the new governor, Sir William Phips. May 18 Mary Easty was released from prison. Yet, due to the outcries and protests of her accusers, she was arrested a second time. May 27 Governor Phips set up a special Court of Oyer and Terminer comprised of seven judges to try the witchcraft cases. Appointed were Lieutenant Governor William Stoughton, Nathaniel Saltonstall, Bartholomew Gedney, Peter Sergeant, Samuel Sewall, Wait Still Winthrop, John Richards, John Hathorne, and Jonathan Corwin. These magistrates based their judgments and evaluations on various kinds of intangible evidence, including direct confessions, supernatural attributes (such as "witchmarks"), and reactions of the afflicted girls. Spectral evidence, based on the assumption that the Devil could assume the "specter" of an innocent person, was relied upon despite its controversial nature.

    May 31 Martha Carrier, John Alden, Wilmott Redd, Elizabeth Howe, and Phillip English were examined before Hathorne, Corwin, and Gedney. June 2 Initial session of the Court of Oyer and Terminer. Bridget Bishop was the first to be pronounced guilty of witchcraft and condemned to death. Early June Soon after Bridget Bishop's trial, Nathaniel Saltonstall resigned from the court, dissatisfied with its proceedings. June 10 Bridget Bishop was hanged in Salem, the first official execution of the Salem witch trials. Bridget Bishop
    "I am no witch. I am innocent. I know nothing of it."

    Following her death, accusations of witchcraft escalated, but the trials were not unopposed. Several townspeople signed petitions on behalf of accused people they believed to be innocent.

    June 29-30 Rebecca Nurse, Susannah Martin, Sarah Wildes, Sarah Good and Elizabeth Howe were tried for witchcraft and condemned. Rebecca Nurse
    "Oh Lord, help me! It is false. I am clear. For my life now lies in your hands...."

    Mid-July In an effort to expose the witches afflicting his life, Joseph Ballard of nearby Andover enlisted the aid of the accusing girls of Salem. This action marked the beginning of the Andover witch hunt. July 19 Rebecca Nurse, Susannah Martin, Elizabeth Howe, Sarah Good, and Sarah Wildes were executed. Elizabeth Howe
    "If it was the last moment I was to live, God knows I am innocent..."

    Susannah Martin
    &quotI have no hand in witchcraft."

    August 2-6 George Jacobs, Sr., Martha Carrier, George Burroughs, John and Elizabeth Proctor, and John Willard were tried for witchcraft and condemned. Martha Carrier
    "...I am wronged. It is a shameful thing that you should mind these folks that are out of their wits."

    August 19 George Jacobs, Sr., Martha Carrier, George Burroughs, John Proctor, and John Willard were hanged on Gallows Hill. George Jacobs
    "Because I am falsely accused. I never did it."

    September 9 Martha Corey, Mary Easty, Alice Parker, Ann Pudeator, Dorcas Hoar, and Mary Bradbury were tried and condemned. Mary Bradbury
    "I do plead not guilty. I am wholly innocent of such wickedness."

    September 17 Margaret Scott, Wilmott Redd, Samuel Wardwell, Mary Parker, Abigail Faulkner, Rebecca Eames, Mary Lacy, Ann Foster, and Abigail Hobbs were tried and condemned. September 19 Giles Corey was pressed to death for refusing a trial. September 21 Dorcas Hoar was the first of those pleading innocent to confess. Her execution was delayed. September 22 Martha Corey, Margaret Scott, Mary Easty, Alice Parker, Ann Pudeator, Wilmott Redd, Samuel Wardwell, and Mary Parker were hanged. October 8 After 20 people had been executed in the Salem witch hunt, Thomas Brattle wrote a letter criticizing the witchcraft trials. This letter had great impact on Governor Phips, who ordered that reliance on spectral and intangible evidence no longer be allowed in trials. October 29 Governor Phips dissolved the Court of Oyer and Terminer. November 25 The General Court of the colony created the Superior Court to try the remaining witchcraft cases which took place in May, 1693. This time no one was convicted. Mary Easty
    "...if it be possible no more innocent blood be shed...
    ...I am clear of this sin."
  • behr655behr655 Registered Users Posts: 552 Major grins
    edited June 13, 2005
    Angelo wrote:
    January 20 Nine-year-old Elizabeth Parris and eleven-year-old Abigail Williams began to exhibit strange behavior.............
    If only they could have afforded good lawyers.

    Bear
  • jwearjwear Registered Users Posts: 8,013 Major grins
    edited June 13, 2005
    Angelo man can you type -- good one the bottom line is justice is as good as you can buy --lawyers are elected to make $ not laws and please be careful what you say about californians -I think there are 8 of us in LA left .
    Jeff W

    “PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”

    http://jwear.smugmug.com/
  • luckyrweluckyrwe Registered Users Posts: 952 Major grins
    edited June 14, 2005
    Nothing surprises me any more.
  • dragon300zxdragon300zx Registered Users Posts: 2,575 Major grins
    edited June 14, 2005
    Just another reason I am glad I don't live in california. Moral of the story is if you have enough fame and money you really can do whatever you want. Even if you don't have any liquid assets. Thats california for ya.
    Everyone Has A Photographic Memory. Some Just Do Not Have Film.
    www.zxstudios.com
    http://creativedragonstudios.smugmug.com
  • camisdadcamisdad Registered Users Posts: 1 Beginner grinner
    edited June 15, 2005
    why not trust the jury?
    Just another reason I am glad I don't live in california. Moral of the story is if you have enough fame and money you really can do whatever you want. Even if you don't have any liquid assets. Thats california for ya.
    I am not a fan of MJ - but - this is a very conservative town where the trial happened - and the jury was ideal for the prosecution. If they did not convict, there is a pretty good likelihood that there was not enough evidence.

    The jury is made of people like you and me!

    Best,

    Michel
  • MongrelMongrel Registered Users Posts: 622 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2005
    Not that we need *another* opinion on this but...
    Well, several things cause me to withhold judgement (in addition to the fact that I wasn't there)-

    I think that Michael Jackson is a very strange person, and a victim of fame, fortune, and unfortunately, a family history that doesn't seem very conducive to growing up 'normal'. I honestly think that it is possible that he is 'wierd' enough that he is innocent of child molestation.

    Is he guilty of something? Yes-even if *nothing* physical happened between him and these kids, he is guilty of very poor judgement at least.

    He is also rich enough that it is very plausible that he would be a target for anyone he allows into close contact with him.

    In the end, we can do little more than put our trust in the jury to sort this out.

    I won't be losing sleep over it that's for sure.
    If every keystroke was a shutter press I'd be a pro by now...
  • jwearjwear Registered Users Posts: 8,013 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2005
    Just another reason I am glad I don't live in california. Moral of the story is if you have enough fame and money you really can do whatever you want. Even if you don't have any liquid assets. Thats california for ya.
    If you ask all your friends that have moved to la to come home then maybe we would have some people that could drive in the rain. OH AND the trial was not in LA in was up north but don't let facts get in YOUR way
    you are jury material alreadyeek7.gif --from some one that is proud to be a califorian
    Jeff W

    “PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”

    http://jwear.smugmug.com/
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited June 15, 2005
    Mongrel wrote:
    Well, several things cause me to withhold judgement (in addition to the fact that I wasn't there)-

    I think that Michael Jackson is a very strange person, and a victim of fame, fortune, and unfortunately, a family history that doesn't seem very conducive to growing up 'normal'. I honestly think that it is possible that he is 'wierd' enough that he is innocent of child molestation.

    Is he guilty of something? Yes-even if *nothing* physical happened between him and these kids, he is guilty of very poor judgement at least.

    He is also rich enough that it is very plausible that he would be a target for anyone he allows into close contact with him.

    In the end, we can do little more than put our trust in the jury to sort this out.

    I won't be losing sleep over it that's for sure.

    15524779-Ti.gif
  • dragon300zxdragon300zx Registered Users Posts: 2,575 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2005
    Jeff,

    Now common I didn't mention LA at all. Besides where I come from we drive in the rain and the snow and the ice so thats not a problem. I just don't like the politics in california (you guys do pay (as my friends would say) out your dark sides to register your cars, plus enviromental testing, and all that), or the court system there (you have to admit that the history of celebrity trials in california shows the celebs getting off more than they get convicted for).
    Everyone Has A Photographic Memory. Some Just Do Not Have Film.
    www.zxstudios.com
    http://creativedragonstudios.smugmug.com
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited June 15, 2005
    jwear wrote:
    If you ask all your friends that have moved to la to come home then maybe we would have some people that could drive in the rain. OH AND the trial was not in LA in was up north but don't let facts get in YOUR way
    you are jury material alreadyeek7.gif --from some one that is proud to be a califorian

    Jeff.... I'm ready to defend California with you anytime :toni

    (oh hey, easy on the "friends going home"... I'm from NYC)
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2005
    camisdad wrote:
    The jury is made of people like you and me!
    Hardly.
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • jwearjwear Registered Users Posts: 8,013 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2005
    Jeff,

    Now common I didn't mention LA at all. Besides where I come from we drive in the rain and the snow and the ice so thats not a problem. I just don't like the politics in california (you guys do pay (as my friends would say) out your dark sides to register your cars, plus enviromental testing, and all that), or the court system there (you have to admit that the history of celebrity trials in california shows the celebs getting off more than they get convicted for).
    your are right i am fast on the draw with the calif comments umph.gif and angelo [nyc] that is what i mean most are not native - and yes i am embareassed [i know sp] about the folks and politics here it is a joke ! but when you guys get here you all forget that snow and rain thing and slam into us :): I will try and count to ten before i reply to another thread 1drink.gif that gets to me and maybe should not headscratch.gif
    Jeff W

    “PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”

    http://jwear.smugmug.com/
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2005
    camisdad wrote:
    I am not a fan of MJ - but - this is a very conservative town where the trial happened - and the jury was ideal for the prosecution. If they did not convict, there is a pretty good likelihood that there was not enough evidence.

    The jury is made of people like you and me!

    Best,

    Michel


    wave.gif hey michel, nice to see you over here at dgrin!
  • dragon300zxdragon300zx Registered Users Posts: 2,575 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2005
    jwear wrote:
    your are right i am fast on the draw with the calif comments umph.gif and angelo [nyc] that is what i mean most are not native - and yes i am embareassed [i know sp] about the folks and politics here it is a joke ! but when you guys get here you all forget that snow and rain thing and slam into us :): I will try and count to ten before i reply to another thread 1drink.gif that gets to me and maybe should not headscratch.gif
    It's cool. After all not everyone from Cali is loopy. You and Ed and the rest of the dgrinners I met there were cool enough. But ya gotta remember there are moronic drivers everywhere you go.

    Remember I am a firm beliver in mandatory IQ testing for everything (even the fry cooks at McDonalds).
    Everyone Has A Photographic Memory. Some Just Do Not Have Film.
    www.zxstudios.com
    http://creativedragonstudios.smugmug.com
  • ginger_55ginger_55 Registered Users Posts: 8,416 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2005
    Funny, I am getting comments about the south on another list, well an international political list who is/are generally bored right now.

    I am glad he was not convicted: my reasons, don't have any, and I do not like his music, nor his lipstick, just am glad.

    And the jurors, I am very impressed with their comments. Most of them seem to have thought things through thoroughly. Also, it took them a week, a whole week, I thought he was a goner then. So the California system, well, it worked again.:):

    Also, it is well known, or thought, that people who can afford to hire good lawyers, in teams if possible, they usually do fare better than others. They also are the ones who make the headlines. That is why they get the lawyers: they can. Martha Stewart was an exception. Sure was good PR for her, though. Michael Jackson is not Martha Stewart, I do not think the outcome would have been the same. I am glad it went as it did.

    Another, haha, is there another, liberal southerner.

    ginger

    sorry, just had to say that before this thread is shut down.
    After all is said and done, it is the sweet tea.
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2005
    ginger_55 wrote:
    And the jurors, I am very impressed with their comments. Most of them seem to have thought things through thoroughly. Also, it took them a week, a whole week, I thought he was a goner then. So the California system, well, it worked again.:):

    I listen to the jurors and reasons for their verdict and think "those guys are idiots". Sorry, I didn't see any well thought out reasons, just a bunch of hunches and emotion.
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited August 25, 2005
    well, well, well... interesting how news develops over time.

    Regardless of what one might think of Michael Jackson (you can add me to the top of the list of people who think the guy is loopy and needs help), there's something to be said about money-grubbing, coniving, illegal schemers amongst us too.

    When we fall victim to mob mentality we all suffer a loss.


    from the LA Times; 8/24/05:
    Los Angeles County prosecutors on Tuesday filed fraud and perjury charges against Janet Arvizo, whose credibility problems were blamed for undermining pop star Michael Jackson's trial on charges that he molested her teenage son.

    Prosecutors allege that Arvizo, 37, had fraudulently received more than $18,000 in government benefits after failing to disclose in her welfare application that she and her children had recently been paid $70,000 to resolve a civil lawsuit. (italics added)

    The new allegations mark an unusual turn in the story, with Jackson, who was acquitted in June, now free of charges, and Arvizo facing a possible sentence of more than seven years in prison.

    Defense attorney Thomas A. Mesereau Jr., who represented Jackson in the molestation case, said the allegations against Arvizo are further evidence that the Santa Barbara County jury returned the correct verdict.

    "This helps confirm what we were saying through the trial, which was the accuser and his family lacked credibility and that the charges were false," Mesereau said. "It was a disgrace for the prosecutor to go forward with this case against Michael Jackson."

    Santa Barbara County Dist. Atty. Tom Sneddon, who prosecuted the molestation case, did not return a call to his office Tuesday.
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited August 25, 2005
    Thanks for the update Angelo. MJ got off because the prosecution built its case on witnesses who had no credibility. Most of the uproar over the verdict came from folks who were upset that he was found not guilty but had no knowledge of the case or how weak the prosecution's case was.

    I'll go with the jury system until somebody can come up with something better.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited August 25, 2005
    Harryb wrote:
    Thanks for the update Angelo. MJ got off because the prosecution built its case on witnesses who had no credibility. Most of the uproar over the verdict came from folks who were upset that he was found not guilty but had no knowledge of the case or how weak the prosecution's case was.

    I'll go with the jury system until somebody can come up with something better.
    Harry - I agree completely. We have a system that, while not always perfect, has functioned very well for 200+ years.
  • GREAPERGREAPER Registered Users Posts: 3,113 Major grins
    edited August 25, 2005
    There is a saying...

    "Do you want to be judged by a group of people who are not smart enough to get out of jury duty?"

    I wonder what percentage of people actually serve on a jury. If you haven't done it, you probably cannot easily judge the position the people on the jury are in.

    I served on a jury once, have been called three times, but only picked once.

    I caused a hung jury. When we went in to deliberations, it was 8 guilty, 1 not. When I was done, it was 4 guilty, 5 not, but the other 4 would not be convinced. They figured the kid had a record, and the police would not have arrested him if he were not guilty. I hope those folks are never on the jury if I am getting tried.

    The prosecuter did a bad job of proving his case, and did nothing to disprove the story told by the accused.

    I think MJ is weird. I think he has bad judgment. I think any parent who lets their kids near him should be bludgened. That being said, I was not on the jury. I did not hear the case. I did not get the facts presented to me, or hear the witnesses speak. MJ was tried in the media long before there was a trial, and people are all upset because the jury did not decide the same thing as the media did.

    I am very glad that here in this country the burden of proof is on the prosecution. You should be too.

    Next time that jury notice letter comes in the mail, think about the people that get 4 million for spilling coffe in their own lap. Think about the people that walked that you thought were guilty. Think about all of the stories you have heard about the bad decisions made by the court. Dont make the call trying to get out of it.

    Go in there and find out for yourself.
Sign In or Register to comment.