Appalachian Spring

TopCatTopCat Registered Users Posts: 71 Big grins
edited June 9, 2009 in Landscapes
New growth gives the hillside a watercolor effect, which makes springtime mornings in the Appalachians one of my favorite experiences.

Taken May 4 this year on Boone, NC, Greenway Trail with Canon A720 IS at 1/160 s, f/4.0, ISO 125.
Tom
Nikon D300 with 16-85 f3.5-5.6 VR, 35 f/1.8, 70-300 VR; Nikon D800 with 24-70 f/2.8, 105 f/2.8 VR Micro, 70-200 f/2.8 VRII, Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit, Dell XPS 17 (8 GB RAM), LR5.3, Photoshop CC
My Portfolio
My PhotoBlog

Comments

  • thapamdthapamd Registered Users Posts: 1,722 Major grins
    edited June 8, 2009
    The subtle greens mixed with the light tones of the bark gives this image a pleasing look. It almost looks like a bunch of green tinged cobwebs to me. Have you tried to increase the contrast a bit? You'll probably lose some of the subtle hues in the shadows, but the image will look "punchier." Sometimes that's a good thing and sometimes it isn't; personal preference really.
    Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap but memories are priceless.

    Mahesh
    http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
  • Hikin' MikeHikin' Mike Registered Users Posts: 5,488 Major grins
    edited June 8, 2009
    Maybe a bit more contrast, but I kind of like this. Ever try a black and white? mwink.gif
    - Mike
    Images in the Backcountry

    My SmugMug Customizations | Adding CSS to Your Site | SEO for the Photographer | Locate Your Page/Widget Number | SmugMug Help Desk
  • TopCatTopCat Registered Users Posts: 71 Big grins
    edited June 9, 2009
    Hikin' Mike wrote:
    Maybe a bit more contrast, but I kind of like this. Ever try a black and white? mwink.gif

    Thanks for the suggestion...
    Tom
    Nikon D300 with 16-85 f3.5-5.6 VR, 35 f/1.8, 70-300 VR; Nikon D800 with 24-70 f/2.8, 105 f/2.8 VR Micro, 70-200 f/2.8 VRII, Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit, Dell XPS 17 (8 GB RAM), LR5.3, Photoshop CC
    My Portfolio
    My PhotoBlog
  • TopCatTopCat Registered Users Posts: 71 Big grins
    edited June 9, 2009
    thapamd wrote:
    The subtle greens mixed with the light tones of the bark gives this image a pleasing look. It almost looks like a bunch of green tinged cobwebs to me. Have you tried to increase the contrast a bit? You'll probably lose some of the subtle hues in the shadows, but the image will look "punchier." Sometimes that's a good thing and sometimes it isn't; personal preference really.

    Thanks for your input. I jumped the contrast on the B&W above...
    Tom
    Nikon D300 with 16-85 f3.5-5.6 VR, 35 f/1.8, 70-300 VR; Nikon D800 with 24-70 f/2.8, 105 f/2.8 VR Micro, 70-200 f/2.8 VRII, Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit, Dell XPS 17 (8 GB RAM), LR5.3, Photoshop CC
    My Portfolio
    My PhotoBlog
  • thapamdthapamd Registered Users Posts: 1,722 Major grins
    edited June 9, 2009
    Truth be told, Tom, I prefer the color version. How does the color look with the added contrast?
    Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap but memories are priceless.

    Mahesh
    http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
  • TopCatTopCat Registered Users Posts: 71 Big grins
    edited June 9, 2009
    thapamd wrote:
    Truth be told, Tom, I prefer the color version. How does the color look with the added contrast?

    a bit more contrast and some vibrance...
    Tom
    Nikon D300 with 16-85 f3.5-5.6 VR, 35 f/1.8, 70-300 VR; Nikon D800 with 24-70 f/2.8, 105 f/2.8 VR Micro, 70-200 f/2.8 VRII, Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit, Dell XPS 17 (8 GB RAM), LR5.3, Photoshop CC
    My Portfolio
    My PhotoBlog
  • thapamdthapamd Registered Users Posts: 1,722 Major grins
    edited June 9, 2009
    TopCat wrote:
    a bit more contrast and some vibrance...

    Hi Tom,

    I think the reworked color version with added contrast and vibrancy is the best of the bunch. What do you think?
    Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap but memories are priceless.

    Mahesh
    http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
  • TopCatTopCat Registered Users Posts: 71 Big grins
    edited June 9, 2009
    thapamd wrote:
    Hi Tom,

    I think the reworked color version with added contrast and vibrancy is the best of the bunch. What do you think?

    I agree. Thanks for your suggestions.
    Tom
    Nikon D300 with 16-85 f3.5-5.6 VR, 35 f/1.8, 70-300 VR; Nikon D800 with 24-70 f/2.8, 105 f/2.8 VR Micro, 70-200 f/2.8 VRII, Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit, Dell XPS 17 (8 GB RAM), LR5.3, Photoshop CC
    My Portfolio
    My PhotoBlog
  • thapamdthapamd Registered Users Posts: 1,722 Major grins
    edited June 9, 2009
    TopCat wrote:
    I agree. Thanks for your suggestions.

    No worries. Again, beautiful image! thumb.gif
    Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap but memories are priceless.

    Mahesh
    http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
Sign In or Register to comment.