Choosing a Canon mount dSLR
So it is time to think about replacing my dSLR. Since I still have 3 'L' lenses and since I will continue to use my DCS520 as a 2nd body, a Canon mount is definite.
The choices:
6MP Digital Rebel
6MP Canon 10D
8MP EOS-1D Mark II
14MP DCS Pro SLR/c
You will note that I am capping at $5k so the $8k 11MP EOS-1Ds is not in the running.
Money does matter!! So I am looking for feedback from owners as well as opinions about the value of various features. Is a 10D with a 300mm f2.8L IS a better buy than a EOS-1D Mark II?
Lenses that I have: 17-35 f2.8L , 50 f1.8 , 85 f1.2L , 100-400 f4-5.6 L IS
Lenses I would like: 24-70 f2.8L , 70-200 f2.8L IS , 300 f2.8L IS (note)
tough decisions and choices....
#note: I would probably sell the 100-400 if I got the 70-200 or the 300
The choices:
6MP Digital Rebel
6MP Canon 10D
8MP EOS-1D Mark II
14MP DCS Pro SLR/c
You will note that I am capping at $5k so the $8k 11MP EOS-1Ds is not in the running.
Money does matter!! So I am looking for feedback from owners as well as opinions about the value of various features. Is a 10D with a 300mm f2.8L IS a better buy than a EOS-1D Mark II?
Lenses that I have: 17-35 f2.8L , 50 f1.8 , 85 f1.2L , 100-400 f4-5.6 L IS
Lenses I would like: 24-70 f2.8L , 70-200 f2.8L IS , 300 f2.8L IS (note)
tough decisions and choices....
#note: I would probably sell the 100-400 if I got the 70-200 or the 300
Charles Richmond IT & Security Consultant
Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
0
Comments
Hopes this helps.
Since it makes no sense for someone with my experience and skills to spend $4500 on a body, I'm going for a used 1D. I hope to eventually graduate to the mkII or its successor.
I see no harm in buying used, BTW.
Lenses (all bought used):
*16-35 2.8L *24-70 2.8L *50 1.4 *70-200 2.8L IS *300 4.0L IS (a mistake, I think, but we'll see.)
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Why? Well I have a Canon Rebel SLR with 35-105 EF lens. So there is a major plus for a me to stay in the Canon family.
My question is... Do you think prices are going to plummet on these?
By next spring will a D rebel and the 10D be hundreds less? I think it will.
What do you all think?
My reasoning is that any "tech" device always does drop to more reasonable levels after a short buying craze.
Or am I the one who is crazed here?
Tim
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
I'm beginning to really dislike you mr. waxy. You have the best monitor in the business, and without an SLR body you already have better glass than me. I'm gonna go pout in a corner now if you don't mind. Either that or go find a real job...
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
I love my Drebel, it takes great shots, but I already wish I had the extra bit more control over AF and metering that the 10D would give me. But of course, at the time, it was $500 more and NO lens to even get started with. If I had a little more "extra" money right now, I could still sell the Drebel for decent coin and upgrade to a used 10d.
CMR - I think you can clearly cross the Drebel off your list, I think your skills are already above it.
I vote for the Kodak - Nikon quality body and innards and a cannon mount. Sweeeeet! How could you go wrong?
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
How long is long? I took San Antonio River Walk photos on Sunday, on a tri-pod, with remote shutter release, and 4-5 second exposures. The quality of the water surface is neat at long exposures, and my image looks very sharp. Digital Rebel, using the EFS lens from the kit.
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
And how often do you really do that anyway? Much more annoying is the lack of ability to set your metering to spot, or even matrix as you please. You are stuck with whatever your set mode gives you.
moderator of: The Flea Market [ guidelines ]
TML Photography
tmlphoto.com
multiplier ........ 1.6 ...vs... 1.3
pixels ............ 8.2m ...vs... 6.3m
Connect ........ USB ...vs... firewire/usb/video out
White Balance - 1DMII more flexible
Viewfinder ...... 95% ...vs... 100%
Focus Screen ... fixed ...vs... 9 interchangeable types
Mirror cutoff .... 600 ...vs... 1200mm lens
DoF Preview .... no? ...vs... button ( a useful composition aid)
Eyepiece shutter no? ...vs... builtin ( prevents eyepiece light from effecting long exposures)
AF ev range .... .5-18 ...vs... 0-18 (AF works in darker shots with 1DMII)
AF points ........ 7 ...vs... 45
Meter zones .... 45 ...vs... 21 (10d has more zones)
Meter modes ... centerweight ...vs... spot and some very complex multi spot modes that are very cool. (other modes shared by both)
Meter ev range . 1-20 ...vs... 0-20 (1DMII meters darker shots)
AEB range ...... +/-2 stops ...vs... +/-3 stops
Bracketing (1DMII) methods shutter, aperture, or ISO
Shutter speeds . 1/4000-30 ...vs... 1/8000-30
Self-timer ....... 10s ...vs... 10s or 2s
Flash (only 10D has a builtin flash)
Drive system (both have single & self-timer & continuous, 1DMII has 2 continuous speeds.
FPS ............... 3 fps ...vs... 3 or 8.5 fps
Max burst ...... 9 ...vs... 40 (or 20 in raw)
LCD size ........ 1.8" ...vs... 2.0"
LCD pixels ...... 118k ...vs... 230k
Languages ...... 12 (both same)
Voice annotation on 1DMII
Custom Funct... 17 ...vs... 21 plus 27 personal functions
Battery shots .. 650 ...vs... 1200
Weight (body) .. 790g ...vs... 1290g
The above is just from the specs, there are other diffs like the speed of AF and the shutter response time. And of course there are personal impressions. I would particularly like to here folks impressions from handling the cameras.
Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Nice list of stats, Charles. Re: handling, one that jumps out is the weight. To accept the mkII I suspect that one must consciously decide that one is willing to tote a much heavier camera. Other than that, the only barrier is the price. In pretty much every way, it's the more desirable camera, I should have thought.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
If you do go with the 10D, get the battery grip and an extra battery. I haven't run out on the first but always nice to have two, which the grip takes. Also great for veritcal shots (shutter release and dial)
No doubt there are some nice advantages to the Mark II, but will you need/use them?
After getting the grip for my last camera and won't have one that is either built in or has a accessory grip. It is a feature you come to love and expect. The weight doesn't really bother me.
I haven't had the pleasure to try out a Mark II yet. If you have any specific questions about the 10D ask. I am not trying to sell it just help with some info.
You are right about USB, I also would probably not use USB.
Good point. I am accustomed to a heavy camera with a grip and a 2nd shutter. I would miss those features. One of the nice workflow features of the DCS Pro SLR/c is that it detects vertical/horizontal framing and rotates the image in-camera so you do not have to do the rotations on the computer,
I probably will use them.
I carry a heavy camera and I do not mind the weight.
I very much appreciate that.
Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
Don't get me wrong - I have loved my 10D, But after seeing the quality available with the 1series Canon DSLRs - I will be ordering a 1DMkii shortly. The improvement in the viewfinder and focusing speed and accuracy are the main reasons altho I am sure the pixels will be cleaner also. Just my two cents.
Also I would not sell the 100-400 unless you neeed the funds - it is too usefull a lens for me - from wide tele to long tele The 70-200 is not nearly as long as the 100-400 and neither is the 300 either. With a 100-400, I would skip the 300 and go for the 400 prime myself.
And an image from Arizona for Andy
I think the most useful of your desired lenses will be the 24-70f2.8 L That is just such a useful and fast enough lens to be on your camera most of the day. My 70-200L does not get anywhere near the use of my 28-75. If you are going to shoot a lot of athletics this might be reversed of course.
The 300 prime and longer are very specialized tools that also require specialized tripods and Wimberly SideKicks or head to most effectively use them. They are not walk around lenses at all.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
It may be important to some that the 10D viewfinder is larger and brighter than the Rebel. It is to me.
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
So after it arrives in about three weeks, I'll let you know my opinion. Of course, that might not be fast enough for you. I hated my first digital compact but have high hopes for the markII.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
You can increase your latitude some if you shoot RAW, but it is easier to get it right the first time.
That's one difference, it's not even close to the only difference. And in my mind it's the least important.
A more important difference is the relative lack of metering modes and the total lack of metering mode selectability in the Rebel. The latter in particular bugs me; the Rebel actually does worse in this respect than my old Olympus C2500L. I didn't think I'd care as much as I do. But it's not necessarily a critical limitation depending on how you shoot. In a studio setting, for instance, I use a hand-held meter and full manual mode. In that case the Rebel and the 10D are essentially indistinguishable (with a couple of caveats I'll get to in a minute).
There are a number of other configuration settings that are available on the 10D and not on the Rebel. Some you can get back with a hacked firmware, some you can't, none seemed that critical to me (eg mirror lock-up). I'm kind of holding out for the possibility of an official improved firmware from Canon to allow them to compete more effectively with the D70, but I suppose it's more likely they'll release a "Rebel mkII" instead.
Having played with 10D and Rebel a bit at this point one other difference that struck me is that the 10D has noticably faster image review. It's not even close. It appears that this may be related to a higher performance CF interface. Running really fast CF cards on a Rebel is pointless, it tops out at or before 22x based on the fact that I saw no performance improvement when moving between those chips. This can be a bother; in rapid shoot situations I'll pop off 4 frames then the camera is locked for 6 seconds (in RAW mode, much less with JPG). In studio situations I find this terribly annoying, since once I get a shot set up I like to burst shoot. It's less bothersome in random shot situations.
Another irritation if you're shooting in a studio situation is the lack of a PC connector on the Rebel. I use a hotshoe adapter but it's not as good, sometimes it slips.
I've had my Rebel since late January and have shot about 3k frames in that time and lugged it around a lot. The case has loosened up a bit in that time; not enough to be a problem, but it creaks on the non-handle side. That's plastic for you. If I'd known just how much I was going to use the Rebel I would have gone for a 10D just to get the metal case.
jimf@frostbytes.com