First time as a second shooter...my experience and a few photos (LONG!) CC needed!
Ok so today I was a second shooter for the first time. It was a simple wedding, but I learned A LOT. I also acquired a whole new level of respect and admiration for wedding photographers. One thing that was tough for me was I wasn't fast enough with changing the settings for the different conditions. And MAN..you really have to be like 5 steps ahead of it all, the ability to anticipate needs to be super high, and I struggled with that today.
All in all I didn't get anything outstanding, but I am overall satisfied. Like I said i was the second shooter, this was my first time doing photography as a "job" (even though i wasn't paid...) and i was supposed to be shooting photojournalistic style.
I struggled a bit with a few things, one being my dang tripod! I apparently can't operate it quick enough, definately need to mess with that more. The biggest thing about today was that the church lighting was a NIGHTMARE. Not a single window, and at least 3 different types of light sources, plus my flash. Here's just a snap of the setup of the lights and the church to show you what I was up against:
then to top it off, along with all the harsh spotlights in the front, there was some sort of blue light coming from above. Really difficult to color balance with that! Here is kind of a neat one that I shot before the ceremony began, and before they turned on the main lights:
yeah it was not easy! The light stayed on, but during the ceremony they turned on the spotlights so it washed it out a little bit. I have a lot of photos with blue highlights...that's going to be a challenge.
We didn't go outside for all the fun shots, the main photog did some formals inside and I just shot whatever caught my eye. Before the ceremony I was able to get a few getting ready shots, those were fun!
Here are just a few until I really get a chance to go over them! (over 500..yikes!)
Please let me know what you think, but also keep in mind the awful lighting!
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
All in all I didn't get anything outstanding, but I am overall satisfied. Like I said i was the second shooter, this was my first time doing photography as a "job" (even though i wasn't paid...) and i was supposed to be shooting photojournalistic style.
I struggled a bit with a few things, one being my dang tripod! I apparently can't operate it quick enough, definately need to mess with that more. The biggest thing about today was that the church lighting was a NIGHTMARE. Not a single window, and at least 3 different types of light sources, plus my flash. Here's just a snap of the setup of the lights and the church to show you what I was up against:
then to top it off, along with all the harsh spotlights in the front, there was some sort of blue light coming from above. Really difficult to color balance with that! Here is kind of a neat one that I shot before the ceremony began, and before they turned on the main lights:
yeah it was not easy! The light stayed on, but during the ceremony they turned on the spotlights so it washed it out a little bit. I have a lot of photos with blue highlights...that's going to be a challenge.
We didn't go outside for all the fun shots, the main photog did some formals inside and I just shot whatever caught my eye. Before the ceremony I was able to get a few getting ready shots, those were fun!
Here are just a few until I really get a chance to go over them! (over 500..yikes!)
Please let me know what you think, but also keep in mind the awful lighting!
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
0
Comments
Facebook: Friend / Fan || Twitter: @shimamizu || Google Plus
http://mkayser.smugmug.com/gallery/8640727_gHimB/1/570140577_Famrw
thanks!
This was a difficult situation and I would really like to know how some of you would've handled it, maybe what I could've done better, etc...
We didn't do any fun posing, just some formals and were kind of rushed at that. I had no control over posing or the timing and was really just trying to stay out of the main guys way.
Things I want to know are...What did I do wrong? Do they look sharp enough? does the exposure look ok? Do they look grainy? How should I have dealt with this? If you were the main photographer would you never ask me to come along again? ETC...
The gallery has more shots to view, maybe I should've picked different ones to post.
Sorry I'm really not trying to be a pain in the butt, I wish i didn't sound desperate but really I am...I realize the photos aren't portfolio material, but I would like to hear something at least, even if it is "I wouldn't be caught dead with you shadowing me"
:help
There were some distracting backgrounds that perhaps could have been avoided, but it didn't appear to be the most picturesque church and for all I know, she was standing there because the main photographer told her to.
What was the feedback of the main shooter?
Nikon D300, 18-135/3.5-5.6, 70-300/4.5-5.6, SB800
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
Wadesworld...thank you...and agreed on the backgrounds but no control on my end. Anyway I actually heard from him a little while ago, he was impressed and had originally asked for just the raw files, then after he saw mine he said he would like the processed ones as well...he said he thought I did a nice job and would like me to shoot with him again!!
Qarik...thank you...I was using Energizer lithium batteries, not rechargeable but I had two sets and changed them in the middle and still no good. Maybe I will have to purchase an extra flash? How is this dealt with regularly I wonder?
Smurfy... thank you so much, I really like 7 as well, and the floating head is kinda funny, I should get rid of that.
Thanks again I just wanted to know if I was way off base or if I could really do this. I think it being a difficult setting is probably better for my first time, so I don't go into it next time thinking it's going to be easy!
Again, I'm a beginner - so hopefully some experts will chime in here.
However, you're dealing with two primary things when it comes to flash recycle time:
1) How much power the flash has available to recycle
2) How hot it is
In the first case, you can reduce the flash recycle time by using an external battery pack. The flash has more power available and is ready again more quickly.
However, in the second case, if you actually fire so fast that you start to overheat the flash, it will either stop firing to prevent you from doing so, or it will simply start melting (depending on how it was designed).
The fix for that situation is simply to lower the amount of power the flash is putting out. You can do so by opening your aperture more (thus allowing the amount of flash to be scaled back), or by adding more flashes (more flashes mean each one can put out less light, and therefore be cooler). If neither are possible (and I would think more flashes would be difficult for a second shooter), you've got little choice but to try to build some pauses into your shooting.
It apparently is possible to buy flashes specially designed for high-speed shooting, but I've read they're extremely expensive.
That's my understanding of the issue - anyone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Nikon D300, 18-135/3.5-5.6, 70-300/4.5-5.6, SB800
If yes.....
Using batteries by the flash is being accelerated by the Gary Fong diffuser.
If you used it - it is shooting light every where.
The flash is trying to compensate thus using more power/batteries.
It is all ready known that the flash runs hotter with them on as compared to straight diffuseurs or a simple bounce card.
anyway .... talk about tough shooting environment.
Way to get thru it.
You did really well considering experience/equipment and the church lighting (ugly).
Later,
_Mark