Sorry, Erick, but I don't understand this picture at all.
Collioure is a small village in the south of France, next to Spain. The only items I recognize are the cars, and probably the trees on the left. The rest is just un unrecognizable grey smudge.
Erick - would love to know more about your intent with this photo. It's intriguing as an abstract, but apart from the context of a set of images along the same theme, as a stand-alone image it looks more like a mistake than something intentional. I don't say that disparagingly - I've had some very happy mistakes that proved better than some of my more hard-earned shots. I would just like some more info about this image. Eager to be educated!
Wow - cool! I really like these! I think the set is greater than the sum of its parts - the images work very well as a grouping. My only critique then, on the image in question, is that it's just a little blown out in the brightest areas, relative to the other images. Toning that down to better match the others would help it, either by itself or with the rest.
Thanks for sharing your other images - I haven't seen your work before, and it helps me see where you're coming from. I admire your sense of composition, and your edgy artistic vision.
I agree with Benjer that they work better as a set but beyond that, all I can say is I like them all. Are you sticking to a specific shutter speed for all of them?
yes between 15 and 30 seconds with a Gray filter or very early or at night, hand hold or with my bike ... I wasn't drunk
I wasn't even thinking you had been drinking!
I've been considering doing a series of 30 second exposures myself and hadn't considered doing handheld, but yours have come come out so well, that I may just have to try a couple for myself!
There could be a minority like your images, but if 8 out of 10 have adverse comment, then I think its not worth to pursue an intentional burry pictures as your style of presenting/capturing/recording it. It could be some exceptional but just cannot advocate as a style because its just blurr which normally associate with poor technique. Sorry being honest.
Interesting. They contain references to some painting from Turner on.
But camera/motion blur is very common in photography, intentional, I mean. And I quickly tire of the same idea repeated, without anything else to support it. They begin to look gimmicky and too facile.
I think each of them needs some more finely worked area in it to give it more significance/meaning, and to galvinise the image as a whole, get all parts working together.
I'd like to see one item in each image get more emphasis, contrast, sharpness, refinement - a seed to crystallise the image, to give it a focus, give it point, a reason.
i just wanted to say that i really liked the set of images erick. i think it's great you are doing something you like and i find the blur to be intriguing and unique. it makes my mind work and the picture acts as a guide for my imagination. i also disagree with the above statement saying if 8/10 people don't like it to change your style. why change your style just because some people don't like it? you can't please everyone... just make yourself happy with your photos!
(i'm not saying don't take constructive criticism, just don't abandon what makes you happy)
I agree, that you can't please everyone. However, what I like about this set is not only the b/w treatment that seems very antiqued, but also the fact that I'm straining to make sense of the subjects in them, and that in and of itself is mysterious and fun.
Comments
Collioure is a small village in the south of France, next to Spain. The only items I recognize are the cars, and probably the trees on the left. The rest is just un unrecognizable grey smudge.
thank you
Thanks for sharing your other images - I haven't seen your work before, and it helps me see where you're coming from. I admire your sense of composition, and your edgy artistic vision.
I agree with Benjer that they work better as a set but beyond that, all I can say is I like them all. Are you sticking to a specific shutter speed for all of them?
SmugMug QA
My Photos
yes between 15 and 30 seconds with a Gray filter or very early or at night, hand hold or with my bike ... I wasn't drunk
Mahesh
http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
I wasn't even thinking you had been drinking!
I've been considering doing a series of 30 second exposures myself and hadn't considered doing handheld, but yours have come come out so well, that I may just have to try a couple for myself!
SmugMug QA
My Photos
My Web Site
thanks to all
There could be a minority like your images, but if 8 out of 10 have adverse comment, then I think its not worth to pursue an intentional burry pictures as your style of presenting/capturing/recording it. It could be some exceptional but just cannot advocate as a style because its just blurr which normally associate with poor technique. Sorry being honest.
But camera/motion blur is very common in photography, intentional, I mean. And I quickly tire of the same idea repeated, without anything else to support it. They begin to look gimmicky and too facile.
I think each of them needs some more finely worked area in it to give it more significance/meaning, and to galvinise the image as a whole, get all parts working together.
I'd like to see one item in each image get more emphasis, contrast, sharpness, refinement - a seed to crystallise the image, to give it a focus, give it point, a reason.
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
Neil all is very common in photography , blurred not blurred , all has been tried , the only thing to do is what you like
thank you
Yes, nearly true, generally and simply.
But I was talking about your images specifically and in detail. I don't think they are as "likable" as they could be. Not for me, anyway.:D
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
i just wanted to say that i really liked the set of images erick. i think it's great you are doing something you like and i find the blur to be intriguing and unique. it makes my mind work and the picture acts as a guide for my imagination. i also disagree with the above statement saying if 8/10 people don't like it to change your style. why change your style just because some people don't like it? you can't please everyone... just make yourself happy with your photos!
(i'm not saying don't take constructive criticism, just don't abandon what makes you happy)
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cody_clark/
I agree, that you can't please everyone. However, what I like about this set is not only the b/w treatment that seems very antiqued, but also the fact that I'm straining to make sense of the subjects in them, and that in and of itself is mysterious and fun.
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
thank you schmoo