Burst of Warmth

dseidmandseidman Registered Users Posts: 824 Major grins
edited June 23, 2009 in Landscapes
The Seattle area experienced some interesting weather for the first day of summer. There were really cool clouds overhead all day but I couldn't think of a good place to go. I eventually settled on Golden Gardens but my best shot of the day doesn't show the aforementioned clouds.

Canon 5D Mark II
Canon 17-40L

571101409_vLaWW-XL-3.jpg




I decided to try out a wider crop in order to remove some of the uninteresting top region of the image. I'd love to get some feedback on which one you prefer.

qEvIJ.jpg

Comments

  • thapamdthapamd Registered Users Posts: 1,722 Major grins
    edited June 22, 2009
    Magnificent shot, Danny! What a beautiful composition, with great FG textures and magical light. thumb.gifclap.gif
    Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap but memories are priceless.

    Mahesh
    http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
  • UmmmHowsThatUmmmHowsThat Registered Users Posts: 93 Big grins
    edited June 22, 2009
    Excellent shot! I really enjoy that the horizon does not equally split the shot. And trees in the sand, now that's cool!
    -Bryan

  • dseidmandseidman Registered Users Posts: 824 Major grins
    edited June 22, 2009
    thapamd wrote:
    Magnificent shot, Danny! What a beautiful composition, with great FG textures and magical light. thumb.gifclap.gif

    Thanks! It was my first time attempting the sun star effect so I'm pretty happy that this turned out okay.
  • dseidmandseidman Registered Users Posts: 824 Major grins
    edited June 22, 2009
    Excellent shot! I really enjoy that the horizon does not equally split the shot. And trees in the sand, now that's cool!

    Thank you. I'm considering a crop to bring the horizon up even higher. I feel the top part of the frame doesn't really add much to the image.

    I'd like to get some feeback on what you guys prefer!
  • thapamdthapamd Registered Users Posts: 1,722 Major grins
    edited June 22, 2009
    I prefer the original, uncropped version.
    Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap but memories are priceless.

    Mahesh
    http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
  • squirl033squirl033 Registered Users Posts: 1,230 Major grins
    edited June 23, 2009
    love the texture of the sand in the foreground, and the sun through the trees... this would even work well as a vertical crop, IMHO... take the middle third vertically. with 21Mp to work with, you could keep just that portion and still have a darn nice image!
    ~ Rocky
    "Out where the rivers like to run, I stand alone, and take back something worth remembering..."
    Three Dog Night

    www.northwestnaturalimagery.com
  • dseidmandseidman Registered Users Posts: 824 Major grins
    edited June 23, 2009
    thapamd wrote:
    I prefer the original, uncropped version.

    I appreciate you returning to give even more feedback! thumb.gif
    I gave it some more thought and now agree with you. There was something that was still bothering me about the picture but I couldn't quite put my finger on it. I went back and re-edited it and have now put up the new version. The light is now slightly diffused with some richer colors.
  • dseidmandseidman Registered Users Posts: 824 Major grins
    edited June 23, 2009
    squirl033 wrote:
    love the texture of the sand in the foreground, and the sun through the trees... this would even work well as a vertical crop, IMHO... take the middle third vertically. with 21Mp to work with, you could keep just that portion and still have a darn nice image!

    Thanks for your comment! There's no need to crop because luckily I thought this through while taking the photo. :D
    I probably took about 150 shots of this scene, including several verticals but I think I like this one the most out of all of them.
  • Awais YaqubAwais Yaqub Registered Users Posts: 10,572 Major grins
    edited June 23, 2009
    Fantastic work Danny as usual i really like the 2nd version ! thumb.gif
    Thine is the beauty of light; mine is the song of fire. Thy beauty exalts the heart; my song inspires the soul. Allama Iqbal

    My Gallery
  • thapamdthapamd Registered Users Posts: 1,722 Major grins
    edited June 23, 2009
    Nice job with the colors, Danny. I'm looking at the image again, and I think the picture looks a little rotated (CCW). It may just be an optical illusion because of the apparent horizon, but appearances are what count in pictures :D
    Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap but memories are priceless.

    Mahesh
    http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
  • BenjerBenjer Registered Users Posts: 275 Major grins
    edited June 23, 2009
    Beautiful shot with a great quality of light and good choice of exposure. I like both versions - I don't find the upper portion of the first to be distracting. The 2nd crop is perhaps more potent visually without the tree tops, but for some reason it appears to lack some of the warmth in the first. Did you lighten it up or reduce saturation at all?
    Nikon D300, 17-35, 24-70, 70-200, 105 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Lensbaby, iPhone!
  • dseidmandseidman Registered Users Posts: 824 Major grins
    edited June 23, 2009
    Fantastic work Danny as usual i really like the 2nd version ! thumb.gif

    Thank you very much!
  • dseidmandseidman Registered Users Posts: 824 Major grins
    edited June 23, 2009
    thapamd wrote:
    Nice job with the colors, Danny. I'm looking at the image again, and I think the picture looks a little rotated (CCW). It may just be an optical illusion because of the apparent horizon, but appearances are what count in pictures :D

    I did a little CCW rotation in post processing because the horizon looked a little slanted. Since I couldn't actually see a horizon line from this vantage and I don't have a bubble level, the rotation was a bit of a judgement call. Maybe I went a little too far. Man, this was a tough shot to process.
  • dseidmandseidman Registered Users Posts: 824 Major grins
    edited June 23, 2009
    Benjer wrote:
    Beautiful shot with a great quality of light and good choice of exposure. I like both versions - I don't find the upper portion of the first to be distracting. The 2nd crop is perhaps more potent visually without the tree tops, but for some reason it appears to lack some of the warmth in the first. Did you lighten it up or reduce saturation at all?

    Sorry for the confusion. I didn't really do enough to clarify for those who didn't see the original post. The first image I put up had the same crop as #1 but the colors and contrast matched what you see in #2. I went back last night and did a re-edit to bring up the colors and create a more diffused look in the light. So the top image you are seeing has since been edited a second time and updated. It seems that most people aren't liking the cropped version so I should probably just take it down.
    I hope this cleared things up a bit.
Sign In or Register to comment.