lighting the dance floor
joshhuntnm
Registered Users Posts: 1,924 Major grins
I have read on here of two mistakes in shooting dance shots:
1) dancing in a cave, where the background is so dark it looks like they are, well, dancing in a cave.
2) dancing in the daylight, where the whole hall is so let up it doesn't look like a dance floor any more.
Without getting terribly picky about other issues, would you say this is approximately right?
1) dancing in a cave, where the background is so dark it looks like they are, well, dancing in a cave.
2) dancing in the daylight, where the whole hall is so let up it doesn't look like a dance floor any more.
Without getting terribly picky about other issues, would you say this is approximately right?
0
Comments
For my taste, it's too bright. Looks very flashy to me and the dress is a bit blown out on her skirt. What was the original room light like?
Flash Frozen Photography, Inc.
http://flashfrozenphotography.com
I like it to look like no flash was used....ideally.
Or go the other way and make it look totally flashed, lower iso, isolate the subject.
This photo is kind of caught in the middle to me.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
I have 5 flashes going -- one on the camera and 4 on stands near the walls to light up the room.
Las Cruces Photographer / Las Cruces Wedding Photographer
Other site
MILOStudios
www.milophotostudios.com
Again, there were 4 flashes off camera and one on.
Las Cruces Photographer / Las Cruces Wedding Photographer
Other site
MILOStudios
www.milophotostudios.com
50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
If you had good diffuser, flash bracket, high iso, the entire space would be lit, emphasis would be on your subject as they would be brighter due to proximity, and there would not be those annoying shadows.
Plus you would not have to carry all that gear.
As I said before the lighting in this photo is kind of in no mans land.
The flip side is to use very dramatic undiffused lighting with very heavy shadows but dramatic bright light and the flashes in the photo some where which can look very cool also. When used as room lights a couple of these types of flashes from each side can produce a very dramatic effect.
I see this type of lighting from several of the photographers on Fred Miranda's wedding forum. You may want to check their wedding forum for more info on dance floor lighting.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
This was done with 1 (maybe 2, I'm forgetting now) and the room wasn't lit by much more than what you are talking about (you can see the x-mas lights in the shot)
Here is a wedding website I created for a customer as a value-add. Comments appreciated.
Founding member of The Professional Photography Forum as well.
Sometimes you get lucky and can 'borrow' another camera's flash accidently. I didn't see this photo until I got home after the wedding, but it's one of my favorite shots. I especially like the paparrazi look of everyone taking their photos to the right of the couple.
(sorry for the copyright watermark)
My thoughts on the picture you posted is that it doesn't give the private look of a first dance. The even lighting takes away from the atmosphere.
PS - FedererPhoto, I love the processing of your b/w shot.
www.kdspencer.com
Las Cruces Photographer / Las Cruces Wedding Photographer
Other site