P&S Recommendation?
Hi - I was wondering if anyone has an opinion for me??
I am helping my parents shop for a new point and shoot (definitely a p&s, don't want a DSLR). Here are the basic requirements:
1. User-friendly (i.e. they are fine with doing the basics on a digital camera and computer, but won't be up for anything super 'fancy')
2. Good optical zoom (They are taking a trip to Africa soon and will be going on a safari. I'm not sure how much zoom they really need??)
3. separate viewfinder
4. # of pixels isn't a huge deal, they won't be making large prints
5. Image Stabilization would be a plus
6. Personally, I tend to prefer Canon or Nikon, but am not completely close-minded
7. I'm not sure of their exact budget yet...
So, from some of the looking I did I came up with the Canon Powershot SX10 IS and Nikon P90, but is that MORE zoom than is really needed? (Can you have too much optical zoom?) I looked a little in the 10x optical zoom range, but alot of those don't seem to have a separate viewfinder.
Any input would be appreciated!!
I am helping my parents shop for a new point and shoot (definitely a p&s, don't want a DSLR). Here are the basic requirements:
1. User-friendly (i.e. they are fine with doing the basics on a digital camera and computer, but won't be up for anything super 'fancy')
2. Good optical zoom (They are taking a trip to Africa soon and will be going on a safari. I'm not sure how much zoom they really need??)
3. separate viewfinder
4. # of pixels isn't a huge deal, they won't be making large prints
5. Image Stabilization would be a plus
6. Personally, I tend to prefer Canon or Nikon, but am not completely close-minded
7. I'm not sure of their exact budget yet...
So, from some of the looking I did I came up with the Canon Powershot SX10 IS and Nikon P90, but is that MORE zoom than is really needed? (Can you have too much optical zoom?) I looked a little in the 10x optical zoom range, but alot of those don't seem to have a separate viewfinder.
Any input would be appreciated!!
0
Comments
For a safari I would recommend both stabilization and a long range zoom.
A P&S or digicam is not something I can recommend for any sort of action photography; they just plain lack the resposiveness that action requires. If they anticipate action, and it can happen on a genuine safari, then a dSLR is really the best way to go.
If they just want to capture typical grazing or stalking or napping behavior, a digicam certainly can do the job. I do believe I would concentrate on the lens properties first and the long end of the zoom is probably of greatest importance.
The Olympus SP-590UZ has about the longest zoom range as well as the longest focal length among the ultra-zoom digicams. With a range equivalence of 26-676mm, this is the lens that can cover many subjects that most other cameras can not. For snapshots of just about anything in daylight it should be capable of coverage. The camera can also make use of the Olympus "R" series electronic flashes for wireless remote flash photography, especially useful indoors.
The camera has a very competent macro mode, allowing focus as close as 1 centimeter. (Makes it tough to light the subject however.)
19 scene modes allow full automation when you chose one of the modes most suitable for your application. (There are also creative modes of full manual, aperture priority and shutter priority for when "You" want to borrow the camera. ) Unfortunately, there is no RAW mode on this model (but the models that do have a RAW mode do not have a very good implementation.)
AA batteries are used, which is nice for travelling in that in a pinch they are available just about everywhere. For a safari I think I would suggest using lithium cells for best performance.
A potential downside is the use of xD cards, and you need to use the faster cards for best performance.
Still, for the application of a safari and the specified limitation of an easy-to-use digicam I do think this is the camera I would recommend first. I would also include one of the Olympus "R" series flashes for extra indoor versatility.
Reviews:
http://www.wildlifeextra.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=9&listcatid=20&listitemid=4921&live=0#cr
http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/olympus_sp_590uz_review/
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
The SX10 is the replacement, and I expect will be a very competent camera. One thing can recommend is that if they go with the Canon, to pick up the accessory filter adaptor and hood - the reduction in flare and elimination of dust issues by using a UV filter and hood, in addition to the ability to use a real lens cap, were great additions to my S5.