Incompatible flash or user error?

GoofBcktGoofBckt Registered Users Posts: 481 Major grins
edited July 9, 2009 in Accessories
I just ordered a dslr300 universal flash for my Canon Rebel XS. No matter what I try, they don't seem to talk to each other. (I read ALL the directions, suggestions, etc.) The flash works fine using the test button, but i get nothing with shutter button. :( Anyone have any ideas? Is it me? Is it the flash? Thanks.

Comments

  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,132 moderator
    edited July 9, 2009
    If it is the Precision Design DSLR300 flash there are reports of "very" poor quality control. If you are sure that it is mounted properly, slid all the way forward into the hot shoe, then it is probably a dud unit and should be returned.

    You might want to try it on another camera before returning it just to be sure.

    Also check the Setup Menu #2 on the camera, the second yellow wrench menu, and make sure that the "Flash Control" menu item has the "Flash firing" set to "Enable".
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Art ScottArt Scott Registered Users Posts: 8,959 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2009
    just as a suggestion......I have lived by this rules for over 30yrs......if not buying camera company flashes then only buy from(in no particular order): Sunpak, Vivatar, Metz, Sigma ......mostly I shoot Sunpak and Vivatar all of cam and fired by wireless rf remotes as these are from the flm days and could maybe harm the digicam with its trigger voltage....maybe not but for a wireless setup that costs under $30 including shipping ....I took no chances.....

    Also you may want to do a google like (Flash name) vs (my camera name) comparison ........remove the () before googling:D
    "Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website

  • GoofBcktGoofBckt Registered Users Posts: 481 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2009
    Yeah, I checked that and it's enabled. And it is the Precision. *sigh* Can you recommend a worthy but reasonable flash for this camera? I'm tired of buying things that are crap and returning them. Thanks for your help.
    Carrie
    ziggy53 wrote:
    If it is the Precision Design DSLR300 flash there are reports of "very" poor quality control. If you are sure that it is mounted properly, slid all the way forward into the hot shoe, then it is probably a dud unit and should be returned.

    You might want to try it on another camera before returning it just to be sure.

    Also check the Setup Menu #2 on the camera, the second yellow wrench menu, and make sure that the "Flash Control" menu item has the "Flash firing" set to "Enable".
  • Art ScottArt Scott Registered Users Posts: 8,959 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2009
    What is you true budget for a single flash??

    SIGMA EF530 ST - canon mount.......at B/H.........$169......ziggy really like the Sigma Flashes also...............
    "Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website

  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,132 moderator
    edited July 9, 2009
    Art Scott wrote:
    What is you true budget for a single flash??

    SIGMA EF530 ST - canon mount.......at B/H.........$169......ziggy really like the Sigma Flashes also...............

    I strongly recommend the Sigma DG Super flashes. Compared to the Sigma ST series they are much more capable and flexible and don't cost all that much more.

    For a Canon camera I recommend this model:

    http://www.photo4less.com/pd-productid-2289-k-sigma_169101_sigma_ef_530_dg_super_e_ttl_shoe_mount_flash_for_canon_eos_with_e_ttl_ii_operation.htm
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • GoofBcktGoofBckt Registered Users Posts: 481 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2009
    Don't laugh . . . I was hoping to spend under $100. I've also come to find, over the years, you get what you pay for.
    Art Scott wrote:
    What is you true budget for a single flash??

    SIGMA EF530 ST - canon mount.......at B/H.........$169......ziggy really like the Sigma Flashes also...............
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,132 moderator
    edited July 9, 2009
    GoofBckt wrote:
    Don't laugh . . . I was hoping to spend under $100. I've also come to find, over the years, you get what you pay for.

    My honest recommendation is to wait until you can afford at least the Sigma I linked to or a Canon 430EX at a similar price. These will give you a high level of automation and use the E-TTL II technology with compatible Canon cameras "and" lenses. (Full E-TTL II requires compatible camera, lens and flash units. Any incompatibilities will render less automation and, potentially, less accurate flash exposure through automation,)

    You can use an older technology with less automation like:

    Sunpak 383 Super
    Vivitar 285HV (the "HV" is very important)

    Either of these are pretty good for basic "auto" and manual flash use, although the Sunpak is a bit more useful in that it has both tilt and swivel functions. The Sunpak has not been in production for some time so you will only likely find a used copy. The Vivitar is sometimes brought back to production but I'm not sure if new ones are readily available now.

    An "auto" flash can do some flash automation, but the automation is based on a relatively simple sensor on the flash itself. The auto flash sensor measures light output from the flash and "clamps" the output when the sensor and output settings agree. It can be fooled by very light or very dark background or foreground items, and reflective surfaces. As long as you understand the limitations it is still very useful.

    Full manual mode is actually the most accurate mode if the flash is both accurate and repeatable in output versus flash settings. "You" are responsible for setting the flash output and distance, but a competent user can deliver excellent results with a manual flash.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2009
    GoofBckt wrote:
    Don't laugh . . . I was hoping to spend under $100. I've also come to find, over the years, you get what you pay for.
    That's true. If you buy cheap you'll end up paying more in the long run - and be frustrated most if not all the time. Quality components are worth it - everywhere. deal.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • GoofBcktGoofBckt Registered Users Posts: 481 Major grins
    edited July 9, 2009
    Thank you SOOO much for all this. I'm looking into Sigmas at the moment, thanks to your advice. :)
    ziggy53 wrote:
    My honest recommendation is to wait until you can afford at least the Sigma I linked to or a Canon 430EX at a similar price. These will give you a high level of automation and use the E-TTL II technology with compatible Canon cameras "and" lenses. (Full E-TTL II requires compatible camera, lens and flash units. Any incompatibilities will render less automation and, potentially, less accurate flash exposure through automation,)

    You can use an older technology with less automation like:

    Sunpak 383 Super
    Vivitar 285HV (the "HV" is very important)

    Either of these are pretty good for basic "auto" and manual flash use, although the Sunpak is a bit more useful in that it has both tilt and swivel functions. The Sunpak has not been in production for some time so you will only likely find a used copy. The Vivitar is sometimes brought back to production but I'm not sure if new ones are readily available now.

    An "auto" flash can do some flash automation, but the automation is based on a relatively simple sensor on the flash itself. The auto flash sensor measures light output from the flash and "clamps" the output when the sensor and output settings agree. It can be fooled by very light or very dark background or foreground items, and reflective surfaces. As long as you understand the limitations it is still very useful.

    Full manual mode is actually the most accurate mode if the flash is both accurate and repeatable in output versus flash settings. "You" are responsible for setting the flash output and distance, but a competent user can deliver excellent results with a manual flash.
Sign In or Register to comment.