Beauty Portraits: Tukta @ Singapore

Zeckson

I brought Tukta over to Singapore 3 weeks ago. Here are some "tourist pictures" taken during the trip.

Pic 01:




Pic 02:




Pic 03:




Pic 04:

Zeckson

Pic 05:




Pic 06:




Pic 07:




Pic 08:

Zeckson

Pic 09:




Pic 10:




Pic 11:




Pic 12:




That's all for the time being. Did not manage to get a lot of shots there. Security people were chasing us around!

Jwar

All great shots. #9 is a bit over processed, but the rest look great. I don't know where you find your models, but they are always very beautiful.

NeilL

Hi Zec, glad to see this new post!

The first 2 sets ##1 thru 8 are FABULOUS FABULOUS FABULOUS

The last set I think fails (very ordinary framing and some individual nits such as veins in ankles, and the processing doesn't work for you or the model, who looks somewhat haggish here).

In all, though, your processing is much improved over your last post (as per my comment to that) - more refined and careful with no messy, plugged low tones.

Once again, referring to the first 8, your use of the frame is sensational!!! You just blow its constrictions apart, and make it work for your images, to add to the dynamism in them, to open them out to the viewer, the model with all her wonderful charisma is almost in our laps. (I wish ) You are my model for that!

You did not reply to my comment to your last post :cry . I asked for your help to find someone talented to do a watermark-logo and webpage for me. Hope you might not jilt me this time?

Thanks and best wishes.

Neil

Zeckson

Jwar wrote:

All great shots. #9 is a bit over processed, but the rest look great. I don't know where you find your models, but they are always very beautiful.

Thanks for your comments. I guess I have brought out the soft lighted red channel too much on No. 9. But nonetheless, I really like this type of post processing. Although strange but it gives a very different feel to my images. Some like it, some don't. But no matter. All subjective and up to the individual viewer.

Zeckson

NeilL wrote:

Hi Zec, glad to see this new post!

The first 2 sets ##1 thru 8 are FABULOUS FABULOUS FABULOUS

The last set I think fails (very ordinary framing and some individual nits such as veins in ankles, and the processing doesn't work for you or the model, who looks somewhat haggish here).

In all, though, your processing is much improved over your last post (as per my comment to that) - more refined and careful with no messy, plugged low tones.

Once again, referring to the first 8, your use of the frame is sensational!!! You just blow its constrictions apart, and make it work for your images, to add to the dynamism in them, to open them out to the viewer, the model with all her wonderful charisma is almost in our laps. (I wish ) You are my model for that!

You did not reply to my comment to your last post :cry . I asked for your help to find someone talented to do a watermark-logo and webpage for me. Hope you might not jilt me this time?

Thanks and best wishes.

Neil

Neil... Sorry sorry sorry... I might have missed your reply on my previous thread! My very bad! Thanks for your comments though! I am still experimenting around both on photographic skills and post processing skills. So many things to look out for. Your pointers are all noted, rest assured.

As for the assistance you need, I do know someone who is capable of doing that. He is a friend of mine. If you are interested, I can introduce him to you. Perhaps we can talk more through private messages or something? Don't wanna off topic here...