Zaqry
We visited a friend tonight and I snapped a couple shots of her son absorbed in his art. I thought I would try to express that here. C&C is welcome.
Nikon D80, 50mm @ f/1.8, 1/60", ISO 100
Lighting provided by an SB-600 on-camera bounced off a high white ceiling.
Enjoy!
Travis
Nikon D80, 50mm @ f/1.8, 1/60", ISO 100
Lighting provided by an SB-600 on-camera bounced off a high white ceiling.
Enjoy!
Travis
Travis
0
Comments
It looks like it is upside down lol makes you wonder what he is thinking.
You might want to blur the bottom left hand corner it looks like that was your focus spot and draws my eyes away from the boy.
Aperture Focus Photography
http://aperturefocus.com
It's an unusual photograph, Travis. I'm not sure your processing has got everything out of it.
But the feeling of introverted concentration is beautiful. And I love how the subject is bigger than the frame.
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
This kid is smart (too smart). His parents are incredibly relaxed with discipline and this fella has developed a very manipulative personality. He's cunning and very subtle in his disobedience. This bleeds into his artwork, as well. His drawings are always family-oriented (mom & dad holding hands, for example) but nearly always have a little fire or an arrow through a head somewhere. He is an interesting subject.
That's exactly what I asked for C&C on this photo. I feel like there is something not quite right but I'm not sure what that thing is. I suspect it has something to do with lighting but, having played with the exposure and contrast a lot, I haven't quite confirmed that.
I am very fond of these closeup shots. B.D. can take all the credit for me understanding this. I always felt like something was wrong with my people shots. There was always a distance in them that I didn't like. Turns out, B.D.'s constant "get closer" comments made something click. That's where it's at, man.
Thanks for the comments!
I would burn the couch cushion in the top right a little bit to put a bit more focus on his face. The tone is so close, that for me it all blends in together. I love how he is deep thought. Great job.
www.jasonpendley.com - site
www.jasonpendleyphotography.blogspot.com - blog
Follow me @jasonpendley on twitter!
I get what you're saying and agree that the overall tone is a little flat. The contrast on this shot is jacked up to 100% in photoshop and I'm wasn't sure what else could be done. Burning might do the trick but I was really hoping to end my PP with a BW conversion and a crop.
Thanks for the input, Jason!
I suggest, too, taking it over to Finishing School. You're sure to get more technical input there.
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
NeiL, thanks for the edit! I do very much like the extra contrast in your version. I do wish I could get that out of the B&W conversion, though. I will revisit this and see if I can eek out that difference. Thanks for taking the time!
I relit it using channels, used the Lighten-Darken filter in Nik Color Efex Pro, and burned around the face profile, to increase separation, selective curves adj on the eyelashes, and high pass sharpening. The crop is a little higher. The overall brightness could be increased a small amount, but the original is very flat, so the highlights quickly become washed out. so it was not just a contrast adjustment. Indeed, increasing contrast destroys skin tone here.
I did several B&W versions, but none of them were as appealing as this color version, none of them convinced me that the image was better as B&W, was meant to be B&W. The adjustments needed to get this color version don't translate well into B&W, so you have either a very flat image such as your post, or one far too noir for the subject matter. Doubt there is a middle ground because of the extreme flatness of the original.
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
Wow, you did a ton of work to that shot! I'll have to take your word for it on most of that stuff and commend you on all the effort you've put into itl. Thanks a bunch!
My pleasure! I need the exercise! And it sometimes takes a ton of work to get what an image promises. Get into this stuff and a year or so down the track you will find yourself very empowered. (I'm not super powered yet!)
Just to clarify one step in my process, the burning round the face profile was done in PS.
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
I find the color distracting - aren't you shocked? - and would suggest something like this...
"He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
"The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
I was really hoping for a B&W solution as well. Did you, by chance, produce your conversion from NeiL's conversion? If not, could you explain how you got the deep contrast in your version?
Thanks!
I wanted to make a B&W, I did several versions, none of them realised the idea like the color version I posted.
I certainly do not underestimate the powers of B&W, but to make B&W effectively a prejudice seems to me to be fantastical.
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
First I did a conversion from the color version, using my black and white action. Then I put on an additional curve taking the shadows down a bit. Then an adjustment layer/screen to lighten the face and hair, and then an adjustment layer/multiply, to take down the couch, the lower right quarter, and the shirt just a touch.
I disagree with Neil's take on this, as I really only see green and gold in the color version - and a face that's so light it disappears into the colors. In the black and white versions, my eye goes to the face. Yes, I see the eyelashes - the child has prominent eye lashes. But what i 'see' is his face, and what he's looking at.
"He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
"The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
Not at all! In the color version the skin tones are unique and dominant, there is nothing like them, they push the other elements back. The light is there for the skin alone. In the B&Ws, the light falls everywhere, the skin tones are gray like everything else, there is nothing to distinguish flesh from plush (compare the intensity of light on the white shirt stripes in relation to the face in both color and B&W - in the B&W those stripes overpower the skin), the face is upstaged by the brightness-blackness of stripes and the blackness of the eyelashes (no 6yo light-blond child has mascara-black eyelashes - get real!). Your eyes are drawn not to the subject but to the artificial eyelashes.
In this image the B&W treatment abstracts the figure, removes him from himself. When I see his skin in color he becomes a real boy to me (eg those pale blue veins in his forehead evoke sympathy in me), and I believe in this image that is very important. An abstract, achieved through B&W, can sometimes isolate the essence of an image. Here it does precisely the opposite. It removes the very reality which helps us to connect with the subject.
This image does not have enough compelling interest in terms of contrast and texture and drama to support the abstraction of B&W. Color provides these very things! Both the B&W versions here look dangerously close to being amateurish snaps to me. The color version has the quality of a portrait.
http://www.behance.net/brosepix