Autumn Visitors

KevinKevin Registered Users Posts: 236 Major grins
edited July 14, 2009 in Holy Macro
DSC_0566.jpg

DSC_0546.jpg

DSC_0548.jpg

DSC_0555.jpg

DSC_0558.jpg
Kevin.
the Photo Muse: http://the-photo-muse.blogspot.com

Comments

  • urteurte Registered Users Posts: 158 Major grins
    edited July 12, 2009
    is this macro?
    http://www.romild.dk
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited July 13, 2009
    Love #1 Kevin - wonderful light and colour- excellent bokeh in all the shots.
    Brian v.
    Brian V.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
    http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
  • KevinKevin Registered Users Posts: 236 Major grins
    edited July 13, 2009
    urte wrote:
    is this macro?
    what's your definition of macro?
    Kevin.
    the Photo Muse: http://the-photo-muse.blogspot.com
  • KevinKevin Registered Users Posts: 236 Major grins
    edited July 13, 2009
    thanks much Brian
    Lord Vetinari wrote:
    Love #1 Kevin - wonderful light and colour- excellent bokeh in all the shots.
    Brian v.
    nice hearing from you again :)
    Kevin.
    the Photo Muse: http://the-photo-muse.blogspot.com
  • urteurte Registered Users Posts: 158 Major grins
    edited July 13, 2009
    Kevin wrote:
    what's your definition of macro?

    1:2 1:1 and so on, the reason I ask is that it looks like some great nature shots,but not macro in my point of view. I cant see any definition here, the wiki definition is here, but they can have another one.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_photography
    http://www.romild.dk
  • KevinKevin Registered Users Posts: 236 Major grins
    edited July 13, 2009
    urte wrote:
    1:2 1:1 and so on, the reason I ask is that it looks like some great nature shots,but not macro in my point of view. I cant see any definition here, the wiki definition is here, but they can have another one.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_photography

    what does one say in cases like this?
    I'm sorry?
    Please refer to mods to move to appropriate forum?
    I generally post here in the close-up mode. I thought these would qualify.

    Thanks for your views on macro.
    Kevin.
    the Photo Muse: http://the-photo-muse.blogspot.com
  • urteurte Registered Users Posts: 158 Major grins
    edited July 13, 2009
    no need to say anything, im new here so it could be that in here its OK, would be nice to know what the diffinition is,in 1st macro post admin say they will delete, but they dont come up with a definition. this is NOT a attack on you or your pictures, but in my interest where the limit is.
    http://www.romild.dk
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited July 14, 2009
    Kevin, Urte.
    Think this forum is really macro/closeup. Most macro forums I use also accept closeups. As usual there can always be a debate where the borders are.
    If you took a strict definition of macro = 1:1 or higher mag then around 90% (at a guess) of the shots posted here would fail.

    Brian V.
    Brian V.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
    http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
  • KevinKevin Registered Users Posts: 236 Major grins
    edited July 14, 2009
    Lord Vetinari wrote:
    Kevin, Urte.
    Think this forum is really macro/closeup. Most macro forums I use also accept closeups. As usual there can always be a debate where the borders are.
    If you took a strict definition of macro = 1:1 or higher mag then around 90% (at a guess) of the shots posted here would fail.

    Brian V.


    aaah, kewl, thanks Brian!
    Kevin.
    the Photo Muse: http://the-photo-muse.blogspot.com
Sign In or Register to comment.