Various Macro Beasties

IPClarkIPClark Registered Users Posts: 2,355 Major grins
edited July 29, 2009 in Holy Macro
Not been about for a while but I'm still around and still taking shots. Not as many as I would like as I'm so busy with other mundane stuff (except looking after my little'un that is) that I have less time for shooting :(

Anyway, Here's a selection of beasties photographed today. Some using Kenko extension tubes and the Sigma 105 and a few just using the trusty Sigma 105. ALL taken hand held which was easier due to the faster shutter speed and smaller aperture I was using. I also had the 430 EX II on diffused.

Not sure if this one is a wasp or a hover fly, it seemed too passive to be a wasp. I "Just" missed the focus on this shot which I'm a bit gutted about but still, it's not a complete failure :)

All comments happily accepted :)

Image Date: 2009:07:12 16:41:04
Flash Used: Yes (Manual)
Focal Length: 105.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.0050 s (1/200)
Aperture: f/10.0
ISO equiv: 100
Exposure Mode: Manual


#1
589173704_9Xrij-O.jpg


The next shot is of a fly. I think it's a simple common fly. This one was about 5 or 6mm in length. I'll happily be corrected on the species :) This was taken with the 36mm extension tube on (I think)

Image Date: 2009:07:12 17:01:44
Flash Used: Yes (Manual)
Focal Length: 105.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.0050 s (1/200)
Aperture: f/8.0
ISO equiv: 100
Exposure Mode: Manual


#2
589173304_8ohBw-O.jpg

The ever tireless bee. I did try to get a BIF but failed miserably.

Image Date: 2009:07:12 18:31:50 and 18:31:33 respectively.
Flash Used: Yes (Manual)
Focal Length: 105.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.0050 s (1/200)
Aperture: f/8.0
ISO equiv: 100
Exposure Mode: Manual


#3
589173263_xcVAZ-O.jpg
#4
589173248_PP8hC-O.jpg

The final three shots were of a common garden spider (Cross spider) I believe. It was residing in our conservatory. This particular specimen was also about 5 or 6mm in length of the body, the eyes probably less than 0.5mm each. These were taken with a combination of tubes on. Can't remember what though.

Image Date: 2009:07:12 20:11:27 / 20:15:36
Flash Used: Yes (Manual)
Focal Length: 105.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.0013 s (1/800)
Aperture: f/8.0
ISO equiv: 200
Exposure Mode: Manual


#5
589173612_xHhmN-XL.jpg
#6
589179107_RgRqv-O.jpg

Image Date: 2009:07:12 20:19:31
Flash Used: Yes (Manual)
Focal Length: 105.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.0010 s (1/1000)
Aperture: f/8.0
ISO equiv: 400
Exposure Mode: Manual


#7
589173604_2G2Uh-O.jpg

Comments

  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited July 13, 2009
    LOvely series of shots - #1 is a hoverfly
    Brian V.
  • IPClarkIPClark Registered Users Posts: 2,355 Major grins
    edited July 13, 2009
    Thanks Brian,

    I thought as much though couldn't be certain. It just seemed so passive for a "wasp" like fly :)

    Cheers.
  • SkippySkippy Registered Users Posts: 12,075 Major grins
    edited July 20, 2009
    IPClark wrote:
    Not been about for a while but I'm still around and still taking shots. Not as many as I would like as I'm so busy with other mundane stuff (except looking after my little'un that is) that I have less time for shooting :(

    Anyway, Here's a selection of beasties photographed today. Some using Kenko extension tubes and the Sigma 105 and a few just using the trusty Sigma 105. ALL taken hand held which was easier due to the faster shutter speed and smaller aperture I was using. I also had the 430 EX II on diffused.

    Not sure if this one is a wasp or a hover fly, it seemed too passive to be a wasp. I "Just" missed the focus on this shot which I'm a bit gutted about but still, it's not a complete failure :)

    All comments happily accepted :)


    #1



    The next shot is of a fly. I think it's a simple common fly. This one was about 5 or 6mm in length. I'll happily be corrected on the species :) This was taken with the 36mm extension tube on (I think)

    #2


    The ever tireless bee. I did try to get a BIF but failed miserably.


    #3

    #4


    The final three shots were of a common garden spider (Cross spider) I believe. It was residing in our conservatory. This particular specimen was also about 5 or 6mm in length of the body, the eyes probably less than 0.5mm each. These were taken with a combination of tubes on. Can't remember what though.


    #5

    #6



    #7


    Hi Ian, those Extension Tubes really come in handy.
    I love the Spider shots thumb.gif .... Skippy :D
    .
    .
    Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"

    ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/

    :skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
  • IPClarkIPClark Registered Users Posts: 2,355 Major grins
    edited July 24, 2009
    Thanks Skippy :)

    I'm having fun with them for sure.. closest thing I can get to an MPE-65... but one day, I'll have one.

    Walk... then Run ;)

    Just noticed that Hoverfly on Yellow is popular, saw Chrissiebeez_NL's one. Hovers do look great on yellow :)
  • Chrissiebeez_NLChrissiebeez_NL Registered Users Posts: 1,295 Major grins
    edited July 25, 2009
    they sure do! love yours too thumb.gif

    like the first and last shot most, the rest have a bit harsh lighting. I have the same problem, so i've just build a coca can diffuser and im very curious about the results. May be a option for you too. I'll post some results thumb.gif
    Visit my website at christopherroos.smugmug.com
  • IPClarkIPClark Registered Users Posts: 2,355 Major grins
    edited July 25, 2009
    Hi Chrissie,
    I agree, the lighting can be somewhat harsh. However, I have had another read over Brians excellent tutorials and I hadn't realised that he uses the Wide Angle disperser on his flash.

    I have been playing around a touch today with the WA Disperser down and my sto-fen mounted and I have to say, visibly, the overall image has a nicer even lighting. The images I took were a little OOF due to the fact that I was having a balance issue due to the fact I didn't want to kneel in soil in clean jeans and I had nothing to hand to put down. :)

    I think I'm going to have a go at creating a diffuser like Brians too.

    Thanks btw for the compliment as well.
  • GOLDENORFEGOLDENORFE Super Moderators Posts: 4,747 moderator
    edited July 28, 2009
    the bumble bee shots look best, agree with light.
    what are you using on front of diffuser?

    phil
  • IPClarkIPClark Registered Users Posts: 2,355 Major grins
    edited July 29, 2009
    Hi Phil,

    I'm using a simple Sto-Fen diffuser on the 430EX. Contemplating making a LordV Diffuser :)
  • GOLDENORFEGOLDENORFE Super Moderators Posts: 4,747 moderator
    edited July 29, 2009
    from other peoples reports on sto-fens they block more light instead of diffusing it.
    kitchen towel on a home made one will be much better
    phil
  • IPClarkIPClark Registered Users Posts: 2,355 Major grins
    edited July 29, 2009
    Thanks Phil. At least the Sto-Fens are cheap so I've not spent lots and lots out. :)

    Will work on a makeshift one :)..
Sign In or Register to comment.