Not to be rough, but the post production on the second shot is pretty atrocious. Cloned clouds clearly visible and the visible line between the forest and the clouds on left side of the image.
PP on the first image isn't quite so bad, but it's still bad.
They look good... agreed with the clouds(I didn't notice that until hurme pointed it out though) also he doesn't seem to be in focus in number one... It might just be me though. Number 3 is NICE!
But why all the PP? Are the original photographs somehow lacking in a way that makes it impossible to use them as is, with just the usual contrast etc. adjustments?
But why all the PP? Are the original photographs somehow lacking in a way that makes it impossible to use them as is, with just the usual contrast etc. adjustments?
That's why I said Im still new @ PP, I tend to want to do too much! My wife, who is a graphic artist, told me the same thing an coaches me now :P
My wife, who is a graphic artist, told me the same thing an coaches me now :P
Good thing too. ;O
I'm a graphic artist first and photographer second, but it's slowly swinging the otherway around. The more I shoot the less PP I want to do with my photos. Can't be avoided sometimes though.
Comments
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
PP on the first image isn't quite so bad, but it's still bad.
Im still in learning mode for PP I'll get there!!!
But why all the PP? Are the original photographs somehow lacking in a way that makes it impossible to use them as is, with just the usual contrast etc. adjustments?
That's why I said Im still new @ PP, I tend to want to do too much! My wife, who is a graphic artist, told me the same thing an coaches me now :P
Good thing too. ;O
I'm a graphic artist first and photographer second, but it's slowly swinging the otherway around. The more I shoot the less PP I want to do with my photos. Can't be avoided sometimes though.