Too soft for success?
Dripfaucet
Registered Users Posts: 35 Big grins
In the first image below is a moment that I felt I ALMOST captured. I really like the framing that occurred without any cropping, but it's just a little too soft for my taste. the second one is a little sharper in the sweet spot, but not quite as interesting. Two losers or is one a keeper? opinions welcome.
Brad
wormer.smugmug.com
wormer.smugmug.com
0
Comments
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
Moderator of: Location, Location, Location , Mind Your Own Business & Other Cool Shots
I don't want to be mean, but, sorry - a miss is a miss. While there's no question a cropped head, arm, whatever, can be done quite successfully, this is chopped in such a way that it looks like what it is - a missframed shot.
The second one's fine - nice capture of a cute moment.
So call me a curmudgeon - if Wil doesn't mind.
"He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
"The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
Here's an example of a way it can work - Admittedly not nearly as cute
"He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
"The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
http://blog.timkphotography.com
the second is great - underexposed, but great... love the expression on his face!
can you explain the under-exposure a little more? metering off his face, it seems to be about right (to me, but i'm a rookie). the sky is blown, the horn a bit shadowy...
all comments thus far are appreciated! good feedback.
wormer.smugmug.com
On my screen his skin, and the yellow.. um .. megaphone? look a tad dark.. not bad, just a bit. but like I said, don't take my comment too critical because I'm not calibrated!
nothing to put in a portfolio perhaps but a nice lively moment captured, me thinks so i would say: succes!