50d vs T1i
Just0a0guy
Registered Users Posts: 23 Big grins
So I have been lusting after the 50d since December and I can finally afford it and the 18-200mm lens but I am curious if anyone has insight on how it compares to the T1i.
The big selling points for me are on both bodies with the exception of the menu wheel but I am not sure how much the reduced burst speed would effect me as I don't often take strings of shots but then again with film you always try to make each shot count. Video is not important to me but I don't know if i would regret not having it. Has anyone used both of these cameras and can offer insights that might help tip the balance for me. This is my first Dslr purchase as I have held on to film for the past 11 years since starting photography and I was very happy when i got to "upgrade cameras" by borrowing my GF's rebel 2000 and picking up some newer lenses to play with. I have a 28-80mm, 50 1.8 , and the 28-135mm is usm kit lens but the cost of continually developing film is starting to bother me and i have 6 rolls that I just haven't had time to send off. Mostly I shoot city/landscapes and our 2 year old son playing. any way any help deciding would be appreciated.
The big selling points for me are on both bodies with the exception of the menu wheel but I am not sure how much the reduced burst speed would effect me as I don't often take strings of shots but then again with film you always try to make each shot count. Video is not important to me but I don't know if i would regret not having it. Has anyone used both of these cameras and can offer insights that might help tip the balance for me. This is my first Dslr purchase as I have held on to film for the past 11 years since starting photography and I was very happy when i got to "upgrade cameras" by borrowing my GF's rebel 2000 and picking up some newer lenses to play with. I have a 28-80mm, 50 1.8 , and the 28-135mm is usm kit lens but the cost of continually developing film is starting to bother me and i have 6 rolls that I just haven't had time to send off. Mostly I shoot city/landscapes and our 2 year old son playing. any way any help deciding would be appreciated.
0
Comments
The fast shutter speed is killer, even if your are just trying to capture a bird in flight or a base runner.
I say get the 50D and don't look back.
Mike
My Portfolio
MaxPreps Profile
Canon EOS 1D MK III and 7d; Canon 100 f/2.0; Canon 17-40 f/4; Canon 24-70 f/2.8; Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS; Canon 300 f/2.8L IS; Canon 1.4x and Sigma 2x; Sigma EF 500 DG Super and Canon 580 EX II.
I have the XTi. I have used it with the kit 18-55 lens. I wasn't super happy but I wasn't upset either. I purchased a 50mm 1.8 and was MUCH happier and felt my camera was taking better photos.
Well, I took the plunge just last week and bought the "Canon EFS 17-55 2.8 USM IS" which everyone says has "L" glass in it.
I feel like I have a new camera! Seriously! I am just floored with the difference between the kit 18-55 and my new 17-55. So that leads to my suggestion for your intended use.
Get a used 40D or a new Ti1. Take the money saved and buy a NICE lens. My new lens cost more than my camera and it was SO worth it. Now when I ever upgrade my body I will have a killer lens to start with.
Sorry for the long post but I am really impressed and I chose my lens based on feedback from Dgrin.
<Insert some profound quote here to try and seem like a deep thinker>
Michael Wachel Photography
Facebook
Lgunnz, welcome to the Digital Grin.
I know what you are talking about but a new user might not. Please elaborate and explain which has the micro-adjust and why it's important to you.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
advantages of the 50d:
higher use rating on the shutter and mirror
faster burst shooting
more solid build
greater sync speed and shutter speed capabilities
wheel interface
feels great in my hands
T1i
cost
lighter weight
smaller body making it more attractive to my GF as I know she will be using any camera i get almost as much as me
video just in case I ever use it (I fear buyers remorse of not having an upcoming feature even if i don't intend to use it but given that I expect to use the camera for at least 5 years before upgrading again)
Admittedly I have not held the T1i but I have held previous digital rebels and they seem an ok fit in my hands but not nearly as good as the 50d I have shot the 30d and really liked the wheel interface but really the more I use the push button menu the more i will get used to it i am sure. no matter what its going to have alot more menu options then my film camera so there will be a learning curve.
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
I do not see the micro-focus adjustment associated with the T1i. If you do find it, please share the link. I also don't see Highlight Tone Priority associated with the T1i. HTP would be a very important component in my decision.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Also realize that the 50D is more of a professional camera and will likely stand up better that the lesser more consumer grade cameras.
EFS 17-55 f/2.8 & 10-22 // Sigma 30mm f/1.4 & 50mm f/1.4
Sigma Bigma OS // Canon 70-200 IS f/2.8
― Edward Weston
The following link reveals that the 450D (XSi), 500D (T1i), and 50D all have shutters rated for 100,000 frames. (look about 75% down the page)
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-Rebel-T1i-500D-Digital-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx
I'll second the suggestion for saving money on a body and spending it on nice glass. It really does make a huge difference. I got started with my first DSLR last December and opted for a refurbished XSi at < $500 from Adorama. I skipped the kit lens and went for a couple of nicer primes, and I am very glad that I did.
As one example, you might be happier buying the T1i and putting the extra cash toward a 70-200 L f/4 IS instead of the 18-200. I know the focal range isn't as all-inclusive, but the loss of convenience pays huge dividends with image quality. For that matter, an XSi with 70-200 L f/4 IS would cost about the same as a 50D with 18-200 but almost certainly would produce much better images (if you could live with the loss of focal range).
Any way, there are lots of options to consider. I still have a lot to learn in this field, but I am fairly confident in two principles: 1) Cameras depreciate MUCH faster than lenses. 2) If you focus on getting the best possible quality of image hitting your camera's sensor, you will then be in a much better position to start comparing what different bodies can produce with that quality.
― Edward Weston
Mhrivnak, welcome to the Digital Grin. <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6029383/emoji/clap.gif" border="0" alt="" >
Thanks for your comments.
I very much agree.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
The 70-200mm f/4.0 L (IS) fits superbly on the T1i .. very nice combo.
― Edward Weston
Why I chose the 50D over the T1i:
Micro adjust (I really thought it was in both but could never re-find the reference I saw it in so I am left to believe it is NOT in the T1i)
Highlight Tone Priority
How it feels in my hand (the T1i would have been fine with a battery grip but buying that loses most of the cost advantage)
Faster burst shooting
Higher use rate on the shutter and mirror (I am hoping that I really will keep the camera at least 5 years or more and depending on how much more trigger happy i get not worrying about the cost of film this camera may see a lot more clicks then i expect)
Build quality
I have 3 different video cameras. I can use one of those when I want to video something I really don't need it in my SLR.
Anyway I'll be ordering it next week after I make sure the car repair comes in on budget and keep you posted on how I like it. Thank you all for your inputs.
http://www.LeahEarlePhotography.com