Newest

rickabtrickabt Registered Users Posts: 19 Big grins
edited August 18, 2009 in Go Figure
606217608_9GnCG-XL.jpg

Comments

  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited July 31, 2009
    Thank you for sharing!
    I'm getting a very mixed set of messages from this shot.
    The model is apparently a very athletic person ("fitness model" in modeling lingo). Her pose, her biceps show that unequivocally.
    Yet she's wearing a glamour-looking bra (hard to say anything about the bottom at this angle, it can be both sporty and glamour looking), and her facial expression suggests something far less sporty and far more boudoir.
    I'm torn...headscratch.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • Kayaking-N-SCKayaking-N-SC Registered Users Posts: 17 Big grins
    edited August 1, 2009
    I love the feel of the photo and her pose, but the skin tone of her face seems completely off from her body.
    Thomas
    Columbia, SC

    Canon 5DmkII / 40D / 24-105 F4 L / LensBaby Composer

    TLKPhotos.SmugMug.com
  • bhoglebhogle Registered Users Posts: 59 Big grins
    edited August 2, 2009
    Kayaking-N-SC wrote:
    I love the feel of the photo and her pose, but the skin tone of her face seems completely off from her body.

    I agree. I think the light fall off is acceptable looking on the body, but not the face.
    Cheers,
    Brian

    www.brianoglephotography.com
  • nikmolsonnikmolson Registered Users Posts: 81 Big grins
    edited August 6, 2009
    sporty girls can be glamorous to! i like it, good shot
  • rickabtrickabt Registered Users Posts: 19 Big grins
    edited August 18, 2009
    Been away for a while....I appreciate your comments and critique...I believe the face/body color issue may be more a spray tan vs. makeup issue than a lighting one...obviously her face was not sprayed....that is a common problem with shooting these athletes.
Sign In or Register to comment.