E-620 v. E-410 ISO
silversx80
Registered Users Posts: 604 Major grins
I know it's not a fair fight, but I did it anyway. Both bodies mounted in the same position (tripod and head position were not moved), 14-54 mk II and remote shutter release. Aperture priority, EV +1.0, cable release. The following will be each ISO and its respective 100% crop. ACR 5.4 as a neutral RAW converter. WB was done by clicking on the same exact place of the bike in each pic. You can see slight color variations, my guess is that the different sensor renders differently. WB was of different value in the ACR window for the different bodies. All other settings were the same for each photo. <1/3 stop EV change to try to match histograms, Fill +10, Recovery +7, Luminance NR +10, Everything else default.
There appears to be more noise in the E-620 on a per-pixel basis, but both shots, full frame, on a poster might show the E-620 to have less noise.
Gallery here (for EXIF and such): http://silversx80.smugmug.com/gallery/9112267_C7CMb/1/607316699_L4Uvy
The interesting find for me is that it seems ISO 100 gets much better shadow detail than ISO 200 on the E-620. I initially thought I'd get better shadow detail out of ISO 200 from all the reviews, as well as better highlight details. I'll have to try some highlights soon. ISO 100 @ 1/13s and ISO 200 @ 1/25s.
ISO 100
E-620
E-410
100% respectively
ISO 200
E-620
E-410
100% respectively
ISO 400
E-620
E-410
100% respectively
ISO 800
E-620
E-410
100% respectively
ISO 1600
E-620
E-410
100% respectively
ISO 3200
E-620
100%
Comments are more then welcome.
There appears to be more noise in the E-620 on a per-pixel basis, but both shots, full frame, on a poster might show the E-620 to have less noise.
Gallery here (for EXIF and such): http://silversx80.smugmug.com/gallery/9112267_C7CMb/1/607316699_L4Uvy
The interesting find for me is that it seems ISO 100 gets much better shadow detail than ISO 200 on the E-620. I initially thought I'd get better shadow detail out of ISO 200 from all the reviews, as well as better highlight details. I'll have to try some highlights soon. ISO 100 @ 1/13s and ISO 200 @ 1/25s.
ISO 100
E-620
E-410
100% respectively
ISO 200
E-620
E-410
100% respectively
ISO 400
E-620
E-410
100% respectively
ISO 800
E-620
E-410
100% respectively
ISO 1600
E-620
E-410
100% respectively
ISO 3200
E-620
100%
Comments are more then welcome.
- Joe
http://silversx80.smugmug.com/
Olympus E-M5, 12-50mm, 45mm f/1.8
Some legacy OM lenses and an OM-10
http://silversx80.smugmug.com/
Olympus E-M5, 12-50mm, 45mm f/1.8
Some legacy OM lenses and an OM-10
0
Comments
Now, if you want ugly, here's an E-510 shot, done at 1600, under exposed by one stop and then pushed, giving an effective ISO 3200....
I don't think you need to pixel peep to appreciate what a bad idea that was....