$400 Budget... WWYD?

PinkShoesRCool

I am currently shooting with a Canon Rebel XSi & 18-55 IS lens. I mostly do portraits & such, so my question is: What do I buy next? I have a $400 budget.

I have an old Speedlite 188A that functions on my camera (no tilt though). Should I get a flash bracket? A new lens? (Which one?) A different flash? I'm not too particular on what I use right now, still learning and willing to use anything, but really don't know where to start.

I went looking through a lot of posts & they made my head spin (both with all the model numbers being tossed around & the cost of the equipment).

So if you were an advanced beginner (I know, strange term, but you know what I mean) and had $400, what would you buy next?

ziggy53

What sort of portraiture do you wish to do?

Are you using available light?

Are you wishing to be paid or are these for gratis?

du8die

Tamron 28-75/2.8 - about $300 used.
Then pick up a 50/1.8 - $80 brand new.

A killer combination.

Good Luck

Toshido

I know what I would do...

EF 85 f/1.8 USM...

$400 new at B&H...


Of course we know nothing about what lenses you have either....

Shane422

Fast lens.
Canon 50MM f1.8 $110
Canon 85MM f1.8 $410
Tamron 28-75MM f2.8 $454
*Adorama.com prices

divamum

If you sell the 18-55, that bumps you up to ~$500. I heartily recommend the Tamron 17-50 (I have one on my xsi and absolutely ADORE it) - it can be picked up for ~$300 used and is an amazing, high-quality, low-cost walkaround zoom on a crop camera like the xsi. I had no idea what I was missing until I got hold of that lens, and for the price you just can't beat it. With the remaining $200 you can add a newer speedlight with more control (eg the 430 ex), a really fast prime like the 50 1.8, or add a 55-250is (~$200 used or refurb) to give you a full working range from 17-250. You can do a lot worse than the 55-250 as a first telephoto, and you can sell it when you're ready to trade up.

If you keep the 18-55, then I'd consider getting either the 55-250 or an 85 1.8 (or its sibling, the 100f2).

Pupator

I agree 100% with divamum on the Tamron 17-50 and the 55-250IS.

amg2833

I love my Tamron 17-50, but if you do mostly portraiture I recommend the Tamron 28-75. They're the same quality, but I find my Tammy a bit short for portraiture occasionally.

You could then sell your kit lens and purchase a cheap off camera lighting setup using some old speedlights.

I could also recommend keeping your kit lens and purchasing the 85 1.8.

Good luck.

PinkShoesRCool

Thanks so much for the feedback!! I love the responses so far. I'm leaning towards keeping my kit lens for now and adding the 50mm 1.8; but still researching the rest of what I've read, so thanks and to answer Ziggy:

ziggy53 wrote:

What sort of portraiture do you wish to do?

Are you using available light?

Are you wishing to be paid or are these for gratis?

1. Kids, Families, Teens, that sort of thing

2. Yes, I prefer outdoor or natural lighting than setting up a mobile studio with lighting.

3. A little of both

Manfr3d

PinkShoesRCool wrote:

I am currently shooting with a Canon Rebel XSi & 18-55 IS lens. I mostly do portraits & such, so my question is: What do I buy next? I have a $400 budget.

I'd recommend you buy a very sharp, lightweight, available light prime
that is excellent for portraits,the Canon 85mm f/1.8 with ET-65 II Hood.

Scott_Quier

Go with a ...
Nice, light, fast, sharp prime:

• EF 85mm f/1.8 USM - $400
• EF 50mm f/1.4 USM - also $400

Both prices are B&H

Richard

Lots of good advice above. But I have a different suggestion: rather than let your decision be driven by your current budget, think about what you really need/want as your next purchase. If it turns out to be beyond your current means, stash the $400 away till you save up enough. You could get a fantastic light meter for $400, for example, but that probably doesn't make sense for you right now.

OTOH, if you are just really itching for a new toy, both of the Tamron f/2.8 lenses mentioned by other posters are excellent choices. I have the 28-75 and love it.

KD5NRH

PinkShoesRCool wrote:

o if you were an advanced beginner (I know, strange term, but you know what I mean) and had $400, what would you buy next?

Is that $400 in addition to the $400 you've budgeted to pay us for this advice, or were you just planning to stiff us and blow all your money on toys?

ziggy53

PinkShoesRCool wrote:

... 1. Kids, Families, Teens, that sort of thing

2. Yes, I prefer outdoor or natural lighting than setting up a mobile studio with lighting.

3. A little of both

Considering that you have a Canon crop 1.6x camera and given your budget and your goals, I suggest that the Canon EF 85mm, f1.8 USM is a good recomendation. While it's too long for many indoor portraits, it is a very good length for outdoor head and head-and-shoulders. If you plan ahead and find the space for shooting, you can back up to do 3/4 length and full length portraits with good bokeh as well.

It is also a good compliment to your existing zoom in that it gives you a focal length beyond what you currently have.

angevin1

PinkShoesRCool wrote:

I am currently shooting with a Canon Rebel XSi & 18-55 IS lens. I mostly do portraits & such, so my question is: What do I buy next? I have a $400 budget.

I have an old Speedlite 188A that functions on my camera (no tilt though). Should I get a flash bracket? A new lens? (Which one?) A different flash? I'm not too particular on what I use right now, still learning and willing to use anything, but really don't know where to start.

I went looking through a lot of posts & they made my head spin (both with all the model numbers being tossed around & the cost of the equipment).

So if you were an advanced beginner (I know, strange term, but you know what I mean) and had $400, what would you buy next?

You never really mention what YOU think YOU are missing here out of your current gear. Could be, you NEED nothing. If you need nothing, then it changes to what you want? And lots of good advice above based on what many folks would want.

divamum

ziggy53 wrote:

Considering that you have a Canon crop 1.6x camera and given your budget and your goals, I suggest that the Canon EF 85mm, f1.8 USM is a good recomendation. While it's too long for many indoor portraits, it is a very good length for outdoor head and head-and-shoulders. If you plan ahead and find the space for shooting, you can back up to do 3/4 length and full length portraits with good bokeh as well.

It is also a good compliment to your existing zoom in that it gives you a focal length beyond what you currently have.

Given your further information, I would agree wholeheartedly with this. In fact, I'd go as far as saying that you'll probably enjoy the 85 1.8 more than the 50 1.8 - the 50 is an astonishing lens for the price, but the 85 is a much faster and more reliable focus-er, and the longer focal length makes it easy to blur out the backgrounds. I swapped out my 85 for a 100 simply because I needed the longer reach, but the 85 is a terrific lens, and can be found on the used market for around $300-340.

rpcrowe

My advice is always...
My advice is always to anchor your lens battery with the very best medium range zoom lens that you can afford because you will probably be using that lens for most of your photography.

The Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 is a very nice all-around lens on a 1.6x camera. However, it you do a lot of portraiture, the 28-75mm f/2.8 might be a better choice since:

The 50-75mm range (80-120mm equivalent) is, IMO, better for portraiture, especially head and shoulder portraiture and since you have a 18-55mm IS Kit Lens to cover your wide needs. The 28-75mm lens is about $455 at Adorama which is a bit more than your $400 budget. However, it would do more for you than the 17-50mm f/2.8 Tamron; considering that you already have the 18-55mm.

After using the 28-75mm along with your kit lens for a while, you might find that you are very happy with your setup. However, you might want a longer lens and the 28-75mm meshes quite well with either the 70-200mm f/4L lens or the 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS lens. If you want an improvement on the shorter side, the 28-75mm will mesh very well with the 12-24mm f/4 Tokina which is a bargain at Adorama ($400 for the original version, $500 for the second version).