Macro macro

Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
edited June 30, 2005 in Holy Macro
On the other photographic site I post in a fad has just broken out for using reversed small focal length lenses on the front end of a larger lens (don't think the larger lens has to be a macro lens). This gives a further magnification factor. In my case reversing an old pentax Kmount F1.7 50mm lens onto my 105mm EX macro lens seems to give me a ratio of about 2.5:1 i/o 1:1. The drawback is the DOF seems to be about 0.5mm and the focus is about 10 to 20mm infront of the reversed lens. As you can imagine it's a bit hard not to spook the insects when you have to get that close- but it can be done.
Some people are just holding the reversed lens- others like me use a lash/up connector made of cardboard tubes- others use proper screw mounts made out of filter holders.
Here's some examples of the results.

First to give an idea of scale a strawberry

CRW_5096c.jpg

A few flower centres

CRW_5074c.jpg

CRW_5116c.jpg

A grass flower

CRW_5079c.jpg

Some insects

A parasitic wasp ?

CRW_5028c.jpg

A midge about 4mm long

CRW_5090c.jpg

A small spider

CRW_5038c.jpg

A small fly (about 8mm long in total) with a smaller passenger behind it's head

CRW_5103c.jpg

Comments

  • tmlphototmlphoto Registered Users Posts: 1,444 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    Very interesting set of images. I think it becomes increasingly difficult to obtain a pleasing aesthetic at such high ratios. I think I may get a set of extension tubes to play with. Any experience with them?
    Thomas :D

    TML Photography
    tmlphoto.com
  • HiggmeisterHiggmeister Registered Users Posts: 909 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    Wow!!
    I've been wanting to put my reversed 50mm on front of my 100mm macro to see what it will do, now I know. Those are incredible. I used the reversed 50mm on my Sony V3 and had a miserable time focusing, especially on bugs. Have you tried to take enough frames for stacking the shots to increase the apparent DOF. Unfortunately I have focus problems (still getting used to the equipment) just using the 100mm, let alone the reversed 50mm added on. Kudos for shots well donethumb.gif.

    Thanks for sharing these Brian,
    Chris

    A picture is but words to the eyes.
    Comments are always welcome.

    www.pbase.com/Higgmeister

  • HiggmeisterHiggmeister Registered Users Posts: 909 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    Hi Thomas,
    tmlphoto wrote:
    Very interesting set of images. I think it becomes increasingly difficult to obtain a pleasing aesthetic at such high ratios. I think I may get a set of extension tubes to play with. Any experience with them?
    I've had a chance to play with my Kenkos extension tubes and my 100mm macro. It decreases the lens to subject distance, but also increases magnification. It also appears to narrow the DOF. The tubes have all the contacts for AF and no glass to introduce additional distortion. I really like extreme macros so they are worth while for me. The narrow DOF doesn't detract for me. They won't get the magnification a reversed lens will though.

    Hope this helps a little,
    Chris

    A picture is but words to the eyes.
    Comments are always welcome.

    www.pbase.com/Higgmeister

  • DRT-MaverickDRT-Maverick Registered Users Posts: 476 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    I've got a teleconverter 2x, which should give me a 2:1 ratio, not as good as a 2.5:1, but decent I hope. I could doublestack.
    Pentax K20D 14.6mp Body : Pentax *ist D 6.1mp Body : Pentax ZX10 Body : 180mm Sigma Macro EX lens : 18-55mm Pentax SMC DA Lens : 28-200mm Sigma Lens : 50-500mm Sigma APO DG EX lens : Pentax AF-500FTZ flash : Sigma EX 2x Teleconverter.
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    tmlphoto wrote:
    Very interesting set of images. I think it becomes increasingly difficult to obtain a pleasing aesthetic at such high ratios. I think I may get a set of extension tubes to play with. Any experience with them?
    Hi Thomas- Think you are right about the images-they are very hard to get in the first place (at least with handholding the camera) and are often not very pleasing. I've had a wastage rate of about 5 shots out of 6 doing these.
    No experience with extension rings I'm afraid.
    Brian V.
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    I've been wanting to put my reversed 50mm on front of my 100mm macro to see what it will do, now I know. Those are incredible. I used the reversed 50mm on my Sony V3 and had a miserable time focusing, especially on bugs. Have you tried to take enough frames for stacking the shots to increase the apparent DOF. Unfortunately I have focus problems (still getting used to the equipment) just using the 100mm, let alone the reversed 50mm added on. Kudos for shots well donethumb.gif.

    Thanks for sharing these Brian,
    Chris
    ThanksChris,
    you are right it is very hard to focus on moving items anyway. Not sure it is actually worth it, but have had some success with spiders- I'll post them later.
    Re focus stacking- I have enough trouble getting any shots in focus with this method Lol. Might try it with a dead or chilled insect and a tripod though.
    Brian V.
  • HiggmeisterHiggmeister Registered Users Posts: 909 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    Hey Tyler,
    I've got a teleconverter 2x, which should give me a 2:1 ratio, not as good as a 2.5:1, but decent I hope. I could doublestack.
    How's the clarity and DOF with the 2x converter? Also, what happens to our lens to subject distance, shorter or longer and approx. how much change?

    Thanks,
    Chris

    A picture is but words to the eyes.
    Comments are always welcome.

    www.pbase.com/Higgmeister

  • DRT-MaverickDRT-Maverick Registered Users Posts: 476 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    How's the clarity and DOF with the 2x converter? Also, what happens to our lens to subject distance, shorter or longer and approx. how much change?

    Thanks,
    Chris
    No actual change that I've noticed in focal distance. The DOF is still left at F3.5-32, which is the default on the 180mm macro. The Stop is bumped an entire stop though, so you'd have to set it at ISO400 to get what you would at ISO200. I didn't notice any reduction in quality. Those butterfly shots I took earlier were with the 2x Teleconverter.
    Pentax K20D 14.6mp Body : Pentax *ist D 6.1mp Body : Pentax ZX10 Body : 180mm Sigma Macro EX lens : 18-55mm Pentax SMC DA Lens : 28-200mm Sigma Lens : 50-500mm Sigma APO DG EX lens : Pentax AF-500FTZ flash : Sigma EX 2x Teleconverter.
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    Couple more shots
    Two more shots using the add-on revesed lens
    Brian V.

    CRW_5191c.jpg

    CRW_5217c.jpg
  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,708 moderator
    edited June 29, 2005
    On the other photographic site I post in a fad has just broken out for using reversed small focal length lenses on the front end of a larger lens (don't think the larger lens has to be a macro lens). This gives a further magnification factor. In my case reversing an old pentax Kmount F1.7 50mm lens onto my 105mm EX macro lens seems to give me a ratio of about 2.5:1 i/o 1:1. The drawback is the DOF seems to be about 0.5mm and the focus is about 10 to 20mm infront of the reversed lens. As you can imagine it's a bit hard not to spook the insects when you have to get that close- but it can be done.
    Some people are just holding the reversed lens- others like me use a lash/up connector made of cardboard tubes- others use proper screw mounts made out of filter holders.


    B&M calls the adapter rings for mounting a normal lens reversed, so the front element of both lenses are facing each other, a Macro Coupler. They come a large variety of sizes - 49 t0 49, 58-77mm, etc. Search B&H for "GBMC" and a whole bunch of them pop up. They are inexpensive - $7.95 each.. Buy several :D:D Or $5.00 from camerafilters.com They will allow the mounting of a 50 or a 28mm lens reversed on a 50, 100, or 150mm lens. The mag ratio will then be about the ratio of the focallengths .

    Noveflex makes an adapter that lets you reverse an EOS lens on a Canon body but still retain the EOS electrical connections and thus the ability of the lens to communicate its data to the attached body. Here is the link
    http://www.novoflex.com/english/html/macro_accessories.htm
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    Thanks for the info Pathfinder,

    I'm still trying to make up my mind whether it's worth doing in the first place, but if I decide yes, will look into the links you gave.
    Thanks again
    Brian V.
  • didymusdidymus Registered Users Posts: 21 Big grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    Fascinating images, what sort of lighting setup are you using?
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited June 29, 2005
    didymus wrote:
    Fascinating images, what sort of lighting setup are you using?
    Thanks Didymus.
    Using the same flash setup as in the pic of the rig here
    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=13654064
    (except of course the reversed mounted lens is not shown).
    Because of the postion of the flash and homemade diffuser- it still works fine with the other lens on the front.
    Brian V.
  • Aussie_blueyAussie_bluey Registered Users Posts: 593 Major grins
    edited June 30, 2005
    Very cool group of macros, well done.
    clap.gifclap.gifclap.gifclap.gifthumb.gifthumb.gifthumb.gifthumb.gif
    Tim
    :rofl Laugh at life, otherwise you will cry.:rofl
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited June 30, 2005
    Very cool group of macros, well done.
    clap.gifclap.gifclap.gifclap.gifthumb.gifthumb.gifthumb.gifthumb.gif
    Tim
    Thanks Tim
    Brian V.
Sign In or Register to comment.