A few JV Soccer on Tuesday Night

GringriffGringriff Registered Users Posts: 340 Major grins
edited August 31, 2009 in Sports
Here are a few from JV soccer team last night. I didn't catch much of the action but here are a few. The team won 6-1. I also took some of the varsity (they lost 1-4) but they are still in camera. The lighting was BAD for the varsity game so I don't know if any of those will be decent.

1.
630807764_PpwAj-M.jpg

2.
630808487_R2NYB-M.jpg

3.
630810402_yarTs-M.jpg

4.
630814442_n9bBw-M.jpg

5.
630814989_FuAwa-M.jpg

6.
630817376_grZwm-M.jpg
Andy
http://andygriffinphoto.com/
http://andygriffin.smugmug.com/
Canon 7D, 70-200mm L, 50 and 85 primes, Tamron 17-50, 28-135

Comments

  • PhotosbychuckPhotosbychuck Registered Users Posts: 1,239 Major grins
    edited August 29, 2009
    my fav #1

    #2 Nice Shot , I would try to tone down the shirt a bit.

    Take Care,
    Charles
    D300S, 18-200mm VR, 70-300mm VR

    Aperture Focus Photography
    http://aperturefocus.com
  • GringriffGringriff Registered Users Posts: 340 Major grins
    edited August 30, 2009
    my fav #1

    #2 Nice Shot , I would try to tone down the shirt a bit.

    Take Care,
    Charles
    Thanks Charles for the feedback. I agree the shirt is too bright.

    I am trying to learn the burn and dodge tools and much more in Photoshop but am having limited success. Below are two more versions (edited from the jpg file). In the first I tried to "burn" the shirt but to me it just turns out too "gray" looking [Also burn is inconsistent - yuck]. In the second I made a masking layer, decreased the exposure of that layer, and tried to paint in just the shirt areas (and right sock), then adjusted the opacity to around 35%. Any thoughts on which is the better method? Obviously I butchered the Burn attempt but generally speaking is one way preferred over the other>

    Thanks for any feedback.
    Andy

    1. Just using Burn tool...
    634325387_NhzGi-M.jpg

    2. Now using a mask layer and adjusting the exposure...
    634355150_JsSBT-M.jpg
    Andy
    http://andygriffinphoto.com/
    http://andygriffin.smugmug.com/
    Canon 7D, 70-200mm L, 50 and 85 primes, Tamron 17-50, 28-135
  • InsuredDisasterInsuredDisaster Registered Users Posts: 1,132 Major grins
    edited August 30, 2009
    I'm not seeing a whole lotta difference in your photoshop edits.


    If you shoot raw, and have raw editing capabilities, then I think you should have no trouble.


    In lightroom, or Adobe Camera Raw, I'd try a couple of things.

    The recovery slider could be used, just to see what happens, but I think these photos are a bit washed out.

    So I'd bump the exposure down a slight notch (actually, more like 1.5 stops for me), then adjust fill light and recovery, a well as the blacks slightly to see what happens. I think you could boost contrast and saturation, lessen the washed out look and really make your photos explode from the screen.


    If you shot JPG, well, you could still try ACR, but I think you are going to have a lot more trouble. Abandon all hope ye who enter here. Ok, not quite, but I hope you did shoot RAW.rolleyes1.gif
  • nipprdognipprdog Registered Users Posts: 660 Major grins
    edited August 30, 2009
    It's all about the faces, not the shirts.
  • InsuredDisasterInsuredDisaster Registered Users Posts: 1,132 Major grins
    edited August 30, 2009
    nipprdog wrote:
    It's all about the faces, not the shirts.

    True, but I think in the photo he tried to edit, the face is still a bit over exposed and washed out.
  • MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
    edited August 31, 2009
    nipprdog wrote:
    It's all about the faces, not the shirts.

    Very true.

    Took me a while to accept this, but folks want to see properly exposed faces and don't care about the shirts. My daughter's team likes to wear white uniforms on the hottest of Florida days.eek7.gif I now ignore the blown highlights on the shirts and shoot manual to get proper exposure of the faces.
Sign In or Register to comment.