I'm a Pro, but will it print!

gfw123gfw123 Registered Users Posts: 41 Big grins
edited September 4, 2009 in SmugMug Pro Sales Support
I'm a 'pro' smugmug account holder but a rank amateur in every other way. :-)

Thanks so a soft hearted friend and brother I have made over $14 this year from my sales. :-)

I now want to spend all that on a large print for my wall. So, I am here asking if this photo of mine will look good at 30", 40" or maybe even larger?

Here is the link to the photo and I have attached a 100% crop from the center from the original.

http://www.gregorywrightphotography.com/Landscapes/Landscapes-Abstracts-Plants/7827095_2A5xG/1/#510077395_YDPWG-A-LB

I don't know much about sharpening, so I can always go back to the RAW image and try again.

Thanks in advance for any info from real pros,
--greg.

Comments

  • MT StringerMT Stringer Registered Users Posts: 225 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    The way your account is set up, looks like 24 x 36 is the largest size available.

    Mike
    gfw123 wrote:
    I'm a 'pro' smugmug account holder but a rank amateur in every other way. :-)

    Thanks so a soft hearted friend and brother I have made over $14 this year from my sales. :-)

    I now want to spend all that on a large print for my wall. So, I am here asking if this photo of mine will look good at 30", 40" or maybe even larger?

    Here is the link to the photo and I have attached a 100% crop from the center from the original.

    http://www.gregorywrightphotography.com/Landscapes/Landscapes-Abstracts-Plants/7827095_2A5xG/1/#510077395_YDPWG-A-LB

    I don't know much about sharpening, so I can always go back to the RAW image and try again.

    Thanks in advance for any info from real pros,
    --greg.
    Please visit my website: www.mtstringer.smugmug.com
    My Portfolio
    MaxPreps Profile

    Canon EOS 1D MK III and 7d; Canon 100 f/2.0; Canon 17-40 f/4; Canon 24-70 f/2.8; Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS; Canon 300 f/2.8L IS; Canon 1.4x and Sigma 2x; Sigma EF 500 DG Super and Canon 580 EX II.
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    Hi Greg, that photo is pretty soft. I wouldn't print it that big, I'm sorry :(
  • PupatorPupator Registered Users Posts: 2,322 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    Andy wrote:
    Hi Greg, that photo is pretty soft. I wouldn't print it that big, I'm sorry :(

    Greg,

    Andy is right - that image is way too soft to print big. But, looking through your galleries your photos are plenty sharp to print large, so I'm not sure what you did wrong in your post-processing.

    Examples:

    510077395_YDPWG-L-9.jpg

    511150239_wYd4U-L-4.jpg
  • gfw123gfw123 Registered Users Posts: 41 Big grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    Pupator wrote:
    Greg,

    Andy is right - that image is way too soft to print big. But, looking through your galleries your photos are plenty sharp to print large, so I'm not sure what you did wrong in your post-processing.

    I am not sure either. But, I have practically no experience at printing or sharpening, so I am still learning. Looking at the raw files in Aperture I see that for most of my uploads I did not sharpen at all. Just kicks I turned on sharpening and uploaded another copy of one of my 'needle' pictures. I think this appears much sharper then my first one. Here is the gallery link and a 100% crop from the middle.

    http://www.gregorywrightphotography.com/Landscapes/Landscapes-Abstracts-Plants/7827095_2A5xG/1/#638886914_iJv5q-A-LB


    If you look at the X3 version do you see that blue 'box-i-ness' around the top of the needle? That really isn't going to print well is it? Will that show up on paper? Should I export in something besides JPEG? I know I exported at the highest quality.

    thanks again for everyone's help.
    --greg.

    I think I am losing quality on the 100% crops here because of the size limit, I decrease the JPEG quality in order to upload to the forums.
  • gfw123gfw123 Registered Users Posts: 41 Big grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    I just turned on 'O' on the gallery viewer, so forget about the 100% crops, you can just go look at them.

    --greg.
  • Art ScottArt Scott Registered Users Posts: 8,959 Major grins
    edited September 3, 2009
    gfw123 wrote:
    I think I am losing quality on the 100% crops here because of the size limit, I decrease the JPEG quality in order to upload to the forums.


    there is absolutely not any reason to change your quality to upload to the forum from your SM site...none.......

    If you want to go big on a few prints go get a trial version of Genuine Fractals.....they allow you to uprez and keep approx 20 files.......so pick you 20 best....if you have not done any sharpening yet then run thru GF and go back add a touch of sharpening thru unsharp mask (if you have photoshop.....I am sure other post processing software has something comparable) and make that huge wall print.......the new version can uprez a good file approx 800 to 1000%......my norm is to take my files as close to 8x10 as i can get at 300 to 425dpi and then uprez to 30 x 40 inches or larger if a client wants......I have fantastic pix off an 8mp p/s that spits out 30x 40's just for fun......
    "Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website

  • PupatorPupator Registered Users Posts: 2,322 Major grins
    edited September 4, 2009
    I've printed my images Huge. I've got a 6' long pano on my wall. I've got dozens and dozens of 16x20 prints. I've never had to use any up-rezing software and they look incredible.

    My workflow is RAW to 90% quality JPEG in Lightroom. Normal unsharp mask is the only sharpening I've used.
Sign In or Register to comment.