Get Me Closer
CyberSteak
Registered Users Posts: 280 Major grins
Ok so I'm just starting off getting serious about photography and want to be able to take some cool macro photos. Here's what I have on hand for equiptment. As the title suggests...get me closer. What would I need to get closer to the subjects I'm taking?
Haves
Canon 40D
EF50mm f/1.8 II
EF 28-135mm IS USM
EFS 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Canon 500D diopter
And I have a EF 70-300mm lens coming in. I'm thinking this will get me closer to my subjects so correct me if I'm wrong and please feel free to give advise on how to get me closer.
Thanks in advance.
Haves
Canon 40D
EF50mm f/1.8 II
EF 28-135mm IS USM
EFS 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Canon 500D diopter
And I have a EF 70-300mm lens coming in. I'm thinking this will get me closer to my subjects so correct me if I'm wrong and please feel free to give advise on how to get me closer.
Thanks in advance.
http://www.betterphoto.com/Premium/Default.aspx?id=329340&mp=V1
Canon 40D, 28-135mm, 50mm f/1.8, 10-22mm, 70-300, 580 EXII, ST-E2, 500D Diopter
Canon 40D, 28-135mm, 50mm f/1.8, 10-22mm, 70-300, 580 EXII, ST-E2, 500D Diopter
0
Comments
One piece of general advice: macro photography is a specialized activity, with many considerations that don't come into play in other photography, and a lot of specialized skills. You may find it helpful to ease in, as I am. I spent a year doing only 1:1 or less, with the lens I mentioned. Now I am slowly learning to use extension tubes, which make things much tougher: less light, even less DOF, more problems with hand motion, often no ability to use autofocus, etc. I think I would have gotten discouraged if I had started out with things closer than 1:1.
Well I've been doing the flower thing recently. But browsing through some of the macro shots in this section of the forums prompted this post. I'm thoroughly amazed at some of the shots and wondered how the heck people were getting that close to their subjects. My macro setup so far has been my EF 28-135mm combined with the 500D diopter. As I said I have the 70-300mm lens coming in and thought I'd be able to get even closer using that with the 500D (please correct me if I'm wrong). Hoepfully that will give me the "fix" of getting closer then what I've been able to so far. But I can see macro as be like so many other things. Faster, bigger, stronger, macro-ie-er. I'm bound to want to get close enough to see bugs on bugs.
Anywho. Here's what I've got so far in the "macro photos I'm not ashamed to show" file...
Please feel free to comment or critique.
Canon 40D, 28-135mm, 50mm f/1.8, 10-22mm, 70-300, 580 EXII, ST-E2, 500D Diopter
To really do macro you will need a macro lens and will be labled as such. Generally zoom lenses are not macro lenses (can think of a zoom macro for canon or nikon). I use Nikon and have the Nikkor 105mm 2.8 VR micro (Nikon's term for macro). Canon has a 100mm 2.8 USM macro lens and I think recently introduced the 100mm 2.8L IS USM macro lens. I also believe Canon has a 60mm macro lens as well. While you may get "close up" or zoomed shots with the other lenses the focusing distance will not be as close or the magnification.
Below are several shots I did with a recently purchased macro lens (actually I need to et out and do more shooting with it):
To get to 1:1 magnification (ie 1cm of subject gives 1cm of image on the sensor) then a set of extension tubes (eg Kenko) would probably be best used with the 50mm lens. Focus distance with all the tubes would very close (around 2" from the front of the lens). For less magnification you could use the tubes with a longer lens.
Magnification = length of tubes mm/focal length lens mm
Brian V.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/