Help spend my $200 - not on you ;-)

brvheart

So, with the help of all of you - I bought an XTi a few months back, now I have $200 that I am able to spend and need help figuring out what will best help or just save it to buy more glass.

So I have the following -

Canon XTi |
Glass - Canon 28-90mm | Sigma 70-300mm F4/5.6 | Canon 28-105mm

Backpack, 2 tripods.

Now what I was thinking of getting -

External Flash (would take the entire $200 in shot plus some I think)
Opteka Grip w/ 2 extra batteries - $69
Strap - my smug one has yes to arrive and my neck is getting chewed up with the factory one - no clue cost
Poloraizer Filter (I have one but it is 52mm instead of 58mm) - $40ish

So - I am asking you guys since you are all more experienced where I would be best to spend the money - if there is something like a lens that I could get for $200 that is worth it and I would be better buying that let me know

Thank you in advanced

brv

JohnBiggs

brvheart wrote:

So, with the help of all of you - I bought an XTi a few months back, now I have $200 that I am able to spend and need help figuring out what will best help or just save it to buy more glass.

So I have the following -

Canon XTi |
Glass - Canon 28-90mm | Sigma 70-300mm F4/5.6 | Canon 28-105mm

Backpack, 2 tripods.

Now what I was thinking of getting -

External Flash (would take the entire $200 in shot plus some I think)
Opteka Grip w/ 2 extra batteries - $69
Strap - my smug one has yes to arrive and my neck is getting chewed up with the factory one - no clue cost
Poloraizer Filter (I have one but it is 52mm instead of 58mm) - $40ish

So - I am asking you guys since you are all more experienced where I would be best to spend the money - if there is something like a lens that I could get for $200 that is worth it and I would be better buying that let me know

Thank you in advanced

brv

I think the gear purchase should be made once you see where your system is letting you down. But if you are just talking about rounding everything off for the hell of it...

I would go for a flash first.
Then I would sell both 28-90 and 28-105 and get a Tamron 28-75 2.8 ~$250
Then I would sell the 70-300 and get a Tamron 70-200 f2.8 ~$650
Finally I'd save for the Canon 10-22mm ~$650

Then I would feel I had a respectable kit and any further upgrades would give me less bang for more buck.

Qarik

definitely a flash..no doubt.

dmeiselman

i love having access to a wider field of view than the 28-105 gave me (lovely lens on full frame, but it's not as useful on a crop body IMO)
I'd sell the 28-105, the 28-90, and get a tamron 17-50 f/2.8 along with a flash, the canon 430ex is available used in the realm of 190 USD, and the tamron is ~300 USD, used.

brvheart

I really only want to get one flash - would the 430 be enough? I was thinking the 550 unless I could find a good deal on a 580 EX II

ziggy53

brvheart wrote:

I really only want to get one flash - would the 430 be enough? I was thinking the 550 unless I could find a good deal on a 580 EX II

The Canon 550EX has a lot going for it, except that it is E-TTL instead of E-TTL II. The difference is that the 550 will zoom a little wide on a Canon crop camera, wasting a little energy in the process, resulting in fewer flashes per battery set and longer charging cycle times. I believe it also lacks the ability to use distance information, if available, to improve flash exposure accuracy.

The Sigma EF 530 DG Super flash (in Canon version) is a true E-TTL II flavor and I can vouch for it's operation. I have 2 of that flash and 2 of the previous 500 version and they work very nicely and accurately. They are not as well built and they do not have as nice a user interface as the genuine Canon flashes, but I get great results and the feature set is very close to the Canon 580EX flashes.

http://www.photo4less.com/pd-productid-2289-k-sigma_169101_sigma_ef_530_dg_super_e_ttl_shoe_mount_flash_for_canon_eos_with_e_ttl_ii_operation.htm

brvheart

OK, so the consensus - which I was leaning towards - flash.

So here I am going through the market place here looking for one. I also need a remote - having trouble deciding between wireless and wired.

Ziggy - I am looking at the flash you mentioned now and considering it might be the way to go.

divamum

dmeiselman wrote:

i love having access to a wider field of view than the 28-105 gave me (lovely lens on full frame, but it's not as useful on a crop body IMO)
I'd sell the 28-105, the 28-90, and get a tamron 17-50 f/2.8 along with a flash, the canon 430ex is available used in the realm of 190 USD, and the tamron is ~300 USD, used.

Exactly what I was going to suggest! I'm a huge fan of the Tam 17-50 - absolutely love mine. Also, if you don't want/need manual flash right away, the 420ex is a very capable ETTL flash, and you can control its output via the flash exposure compensation function in the camera (in some ways, I still prefer mine to the 430 I also have). And if (when) you want TWO flashes, you can use it as a slave. You can pick up the 420ex used for ~$100.

Nikolai

If you shoot landscapes, get a (circular) polarizer, a 6 stop ND (max diameter + a set of adapters), and a better wide angle lens.

If you shoot people, get a good flash and a reflector (maybe sell one of the 28-xx to cover the cost, why have two with nearly identical coverage?)

BTW, I'm surprised you don't have 50mm prime in your arsenal.

brvheart

is the 430 EX enough flash?

Nikolai

brvheart wrote:

is the 430 EX enough flash?

Google is your friend:
http://photo-tips-online.com/review/canon-430ex-ii-vs-canon-580ex-ii/

divamum

brvheart wrote:

is the 430 EX enough flash?

To do what?

I've found it plenty strong indoors. Outdoors - as I just discovered this weekend - a little more oomph might have been nice, but I suspect as I practice more with it in those conditions I'll figure out how I need to use it; there are almost always workarounds (ie, flash closer to subject, different modifier which cuts less power, battery pack so I can use it on higher power without affecting recycling times etc etc)

BTW, I got mine as a refurb from Adorama for $199 - it's been a great purchase.

ziggy53

The Canon 430EX is Canon's second best electronic flash, so it has a lot going for it. It is not just a reduced power 580EX however. It is also lacking the incremental power control of the 580EX and it can only act as a slave, while the 580EX can be both master and slave.

The Sigma EF 530DG Super has less power than the Canon 580EX, but more than the 430EX. The Sigma is capable of being both E-TTL master and slave, as well as having an optical slave built-in. The Sigma has an AF assist light, as do both of the Canon flashes, but the Canon AF assist is better. The Sigma is completely serviceable and I don't find it a problem at all.

The incremental power control on the Sigma is similar to the 430EX, so the 580EX is much better.

All told the Sigma is a bargain for the feature set and the E-TTL II emulation is accurate. I use them professionally and they really are up to the task. Treat them properly and use them correctly and they reward you with great results.

brvheart

ziggy53 wrote:

The Canon 430EX is Canon's second best electronic flash, so it has a lot going for it. It is not just a reduced power 580EX however. It is also lacking the incremental power control of the 580EX and it can only act as a slave, while the 580EX can be both master and slave.

The Sigma EF 530DG Super has less power than the Canon 580EX, but more than the 430EX. The Sigma is capable of being both E-TTL master and slave, as well as having an optical slave built-in. The Sigma has an AF assist light, as do both of the Canon flashes, but the Canon AF assist is better. The Sigma is completely serviceable and I don't find it a problem at all.

The incremental power control on the Sigma is similar to the 430EX, so the 580EX is much better.

All told the Sigma is a bargain for the feature set and the E-TTL II emulation is accurate. I use them professionally and they really are up to the task. Treat them properly and use them correctly and they reward you with great results.

Ziggy as always - thank you for the wonderful info and insight - I think you made my choice for me

brvheart

Nikolai wrote:

Google is your friend:
http://photo-tips-online.com/review/canon-430ex-ii-vs-canon-580ex-ii/

16 thousand some odd post and that is all you can come up? Consult the Google....

Just kidding man, thank you for that link answered all my questions.

divamum

ziggy53 wrote:

The Canon 430EX is Canon's second best electronic flash, so it has a lot going for it. It is not just a reduced power 580EX however. It is also lacking the incremental power control of the 580EX and it can only act as a slave, while the 580EX can be both master and slave.

What do you mean by "incremental power control"? The 430ex has both ETTL and manual power adjustment on the flash itself (the 420 does not, of course, only being controllable via the camera's FEC). I haven't used a 580ex/II so don't know how it compares, but adjustment is certainly an option

ziggy53

divamum wrote:

What do you mean by "incremental power control"? The 430ex has both ETTL and manual power adjustment on the flash itself (the 420 does not, of course, only being controllable via the camera's FEC). I haven't used a 580ex/II so don't know how it compares, but adjustment is certainly an option

For the 580EX, it goes from full power to 1/128th power in 1/3rd stop increments. The 430EX goes from full power to 1/64th in full stop increments. The Sigma 530 DG Super goes full power to 1/128th power in full stop increments.

E-TTL and E-TTL II control should be much finer increments for any of the flashes.

divamum

ziggy53 wrote:

For the 580EX, it goes from full power to 1/128th power in 1/3rd stop increments. The 430EX goes from full power to 1/64th in full stop increments. The Sigma 530 DG Super goes full power to 1/128th power in full stop increments.

E-TTL and E-TTL II control should be much finer increments for any of the flashes.

Aha! Thanks Ziggy - now I understand!