At the driving range

JohnnyNapalmJohnnyNapalm Registered Users Posts: 134 Major grins
edited September 25, 2009 in Sports
Testing out a rented 70-200 f/2.8...I think I'm in love.

659238112_QCkxD-XL.jpg

Comments

  • KellyCKellyC Registered Users Posts: 129 Major grins
    edited September 24, 2009
    Nice lens, I bought myself one this spring, and like it a lot too. It is really great for outdoor sports. I am going to give it a try tonight on some high school volleyball... I currently only have a D90, but hope to save up for a D700 someday.
  • johngjohng Registered Users Posts: 1,658 Major grins
    edited September 24, 2009
    And a nice image too!
  • QarikQarik Registered Users Posts: 4,959 Major grins
    edited September 24, 2009
    heh..a "slice" of focus.

    btw canon or nikon?
    D700, D600
    14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
    85 and 50 1.4
    45 PC and sb910 x2
    http://www.danielkimphotography.com
  • JohnnyNapalmJohnnyNapalm Registered Users Posts: 134 Major grins
    edited September 24, 2009
    Qarik wrote:
    heh..a "slice" of focus.

    btw canon or nikon?
    Canon 5D! Thanks for the replies.
  • ErbemanErbeman Registered Users Posts: 926 Major grins
    edited September 25, 2009
    Yup, it's by far my favorite lens. I absolutely love the versatility of it especially having a D300 which is a crop sensor camera and a D700 which is a full frame. If I need distance I can throw my 1.7 tc on it and use the D300 and it's freakin great. I can also use it close up on my D700. It's so nice to have the quality of the lens along with being able to zoom in and out and not have to used a fixed distance like the other great sports lenses. That being said, I did talk my wife into agreeing that I need a 300 F/2.8 before next football season starts! Woo Hoo!!
    Come see my Photos at:
    http://www.RussErbePhotography.com :thumb
    http://www.sportsshooter.com/erbeman



    D700, D300, Nikkor 35-70 F/2.8, Nikkor 50mm F/1.8, Nikkor 70-200 AF-S VR F/2.8, Nikkor AF-S 1.7 teleconverter II,(2) Profoto D1 500 Air,SB-900, SB-600, (2)MB-D10, MacBook Pro
  • johngjohng Registered Users Posts: 1,658 Major grins
    edited September 25, 2009
    Canon 5D! Thanks for the replies.

    I will say this. A 70-200 2.8 on a full frame is a fantastic lens. But I'll ask - did you post on the sports page just because this particular shot is sports-related or are you intending to get the lens to shoot sports?

    The reason I say that is that you're going to find 200mm way too short for many sports. Way too short for full field baseball/soccer/football on a full frame. Too short for tournament golf.

    For indoor sports, realize you'll have to shoot at ISO 3200-6400 if you're not using flash and shooting HS level or below. Are you comfortable with that ISO performance from your 5d?

    So, while it's very sharp, and it's often a staple in sports shooter bags I will also say it's often a 2nd lens for close action when longer primes are too tight. So, if you are buying the lens for sports shooting there may be better fits depending on what you shoot. Shoot full field soccer in good light? You may find you get more keepers using a 100-400L or a Bigma or Sigma 100-300 f4. Especially on a full size sensor camera.

    But for other work it's an exceptional lens. But sports work, using an original 5d you may find the f2.8 not enough for indoor work and you may find 200mm not nearly long enough for outdoor work. Hope that makes sense.
  • JohnnyNapalmJohnnyNapalm Registered Users Posts: 134 Major grins
    edited September 25, 2009
    johng wrote:
    I will say this. A 70-200 2.8 on a full frame is a fantastic lens. But I'll ask - did you post on the sports page just because this particular shot is sports-related or are you intending to get the lens to shoot sports?

    The reason I say that is that you're going to find 200mm way too short for many sports. Way too short for full field baseball/soccer/football on a full frame. Too short for tournament golf.

    For indoor sports, realize you'll have to shoot at ISO 3200-6400 if you're not using flash and shooting HS level or below. Are you comfortable with that ISO performance from your 5d?

    So, while it's very sharp, and it's often a staple in sports shooter bags I will also say it's often a 2nd lens for close action when longer primes are too tight. So, if you are buying the lens for sports shooting there may be better fits depending on what you shoot. Shoot full field soccer in good light? You may find you get more keepers using a 100-400L or a Bigma or Sigma 100-300 f4. Especially on a full size sensor camera.

    But for other work it's an exceptional lens. But sports work, using an original 5d you may find the f2.8 not enough for indoor work and you may find 200mm not nearly long enough for outdoor work. Hope that makes sense.
    All of that makes total sense. This particular shot is in here because it's golf-related. I'm a portrait/small event shooter where 75mm is on the long end, so this was just a rental for a different kind of event for me. I wasn't responsible for getting pictures of the golfers on the course, so 200mm was more than acceptable for my uses here.

    I would love to get my hands on a 400mm lens. I can't even begin to imagine how fun it must be. :D
Sign In or Register to comment.