Face painting
BeamCatcher
Registered Users Posts: 81 Big grins
Hi folks!
A friend of my neighbor had a combined Christening and Birthday party.
This is my neighbors little girl a few seconds after being face painted.
What do you think?
Cheers! Ivar aka. Beam
A friend of my neighbor had a combined Christening and Birthday party.
This is my neighbors little girl a few seconds after being face painted.
What do you think?
Cheers! Ivar aka. Beam
Canon 7D
Canon 16-35mm f2.8 II
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Canon Speedlite 550EX
http://www.beamcatcher.com/layout/Pictures.html
Canon 16-35mm f2.8 II
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Canon Speedlite 550EX
http://www.beamcatcher.com/layout/Pictures.html
0
Comments
Just curious why you went with the 16-35/2.8 when you could have the 17-55/2.8IS for a lot less? Going FF soon?
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Kelly
My Photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/freezethemomentphotography/
http://www.kfsphotography.smugmug.com
Thanks folks!
jmphotocraft: 16-35/2.8 or 17-55/2.8IS
Well... I am a sucker for the glass in the L lenses!
I've tried a lot of different lenses, but somehow always come back to them. *lol*
I know you can change as you heart desire all the color, saturation etc. but personally I do find it giving that little bit extra. -Even the build quality feels rugged and good. Not really planning any full frame. Just a hobby... and to be honest having a lens like the 50mm f/1.2 L USM gives me 80mm at f/1.2 which I find an amazing lens for portrait. If I was to go full frame I would have to spit in more cash for the camera, another grand in between for a similar aperture on the 85mm, and let's face it... even bigger and more demanding raw files!
I am not happy with the noise level on my camera, but in terms of resolution I am totally fine....
I just hope the manufacturers stop the megapixel race, and start focusing on the quality.
Cheers! Ivar
PS Here's one at f/1.2
Canon 16-35mm f2.8 II
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Canon Speedlite 550EX
http://www.beamcatcher.com/layout/Pictures.html
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Wasn't aware actually. and yes... even the red line and L doesn't always spell top level.... (I had my 70-200) in twice with Canon to have it calibrated. At one stage it even looked like it was the body with a problem. Oh well. As a walk around.. sure it's not much... but I guess that's only raising the bar for what I need to deliver. *lol* I walked around with a M6 and 35mm summicron for a couple of years. Great fun! -Even if you miss some situations.
Tempting to upgrade to 7D?
Cheers! Ivar
PS! What does YMMV stand for.....?
Canon 16-35mm f2.8 II
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Canon Speedlite 550EX
http://www.beamcatcher.com/layout/Pictures.html
"He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
"The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
Albert@WhetstoneImagery.com
http://Albert-Dickson.com
I only point this out because you could probably sell that 16-35, buy a 17-55, pocket several hundred, and come away with 20 more mm and IS!
7D is very tempting. If the AF reviews well I may upgrade my 1D2N for it.
M6... nice!! Someday.
YMMV = your mileage may vary.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.