A bit underwhelming since they have macro lens at 60mm and 105mm. I don;t really see this lens filling in any major gaps. If this were a 1.4 lens then hooray.
I like it. It is very light (lighter than the Tamron 90) and has VR, which reduces the need for a tripod. Perfect light hiking carry-along for those wildflowers and other nature shots.
The 105 has VR, but is large, heavy, and costs $900.
I think I'll sell my Tamron 90 and get one of these.
Folks, Nikon DX cameras still far outsell Nikon FX cameras. Nikon is just supporting an existing market and proving that they intend to continue production and support for the smaller format.
FX lenses will continue to be developed as well, and the Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF-S is evidence that Nikon will bow to no one. The Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II AF-S is also new, and the Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S is good as is.
If I were a Nikon FX shooter, I would be very happy to have those zoom lenses. Basic primes are already there as are the PC lenses.
I suspect Nikon will develop some FX f4 "ED" zooms now that the high ISO cameras have been developed.
Maybe some more exotic primes could be designed, for a very limited market, but what else is really needed?
Folks, Nikon DX cameras still far outsell Nikon FX cameras. Nikon is just supporting an existing market and proving that they intend to continue production and support for the smaller format.
FX lenses will continue to be developed as well, and the Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF-S is evidence that Nikon will bow to no one. The Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II AF-S is also new, and the Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S is good as is.
If I were a Nikon FX shooter, I would be very happy to have those zoom lenses. Basic primes are already there as are the PC lenses.
I suspect Nikon will develop some FX f4 "ED" zooms now that the high ISO cameras have been developed.
Maybe some more exotic primes could be designed, for a very limited market, but what else is really needed?
I agree they have a very good setup, no doubt. If I was rich I'd buy:
14-24mm
24-70mm
70-200mm
200-400mm
and I'd be set, but that's $12K worth of glass. It'd be nice to have a 17-55 that wasn't DX or an equivalent to the Canon 24-105 F4 as well as some less expensive but slower ED glass. There are rumors of a 100-500mm ED F4-6.3 and I'd buy that in a heartbeat.
I agree they have a very good setup, no doubt. If I was rich I'd buy:
Ultra telephotos
85mm pc
24mm pc
60mm macro
105mm macro
14-24mm
24-70mm
70-200mm
200-400mm and etc...
and I'd be set, but that's $12K worth of glass. It'd be nice to have a 17-55 that wasn't DX or an equivalent to the Canon 24-105 F4 as well as some less expensive but slower ED glass. There are rumors of a 100-500mm ED F4-6.3 and I'd buy that in a heartbeat.
Comments
I am holding out for the AF-S DX XYZ HyperV Uber f/1.1 ED VR-TypeR 1-1000mm!!!!!
You for thegot Nano coating!
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
Need new FX glass!!
Yeah, it's getting silly now.
The 105 has VR, but is large, heavy, and costs $900.
I think I'll sell my Tamron 90 and get one of these.
agreed. the number of increasingly useless DX lenses is just .....
FX lenses will continue to be developed as well, and the Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF-S is evidence that Nikon will bow to no one. The Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II AF-S is also new, and the Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S is good as is.
If I were a Nikon FX shooter, I would be very happy to have those zoom lenses. Basic primes are already there as are the PC lenses.
I suspect Nikon will develop some FX f4 "ED" zooms now that the high ISO cameras have been developed.
Maybe some more exotic primes could be designed, for a very limited market, but what else is really needed?
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
I agree they have a very good setup, no doubt. If I was rich I'd buy:
14-24mm
24-70mm
70-200mm
200-400mm
and I'd be set, but that's $12K worth of glass. It'd be nice to have a 17-55 that wasn't DX or an equivalent to the Canon 24-105 F4 as well as some less expensive but slower ED glass. There are rumors of a 100-500mm ED F4-6.3 and I'd buy that in a heartbeat.
Fixed
There is a 105mm ED VR macro lens. It will probably be the first lens I actually buy because it is *just* $900 but oh so sweet.