Some from the past few months...

thoth

Enjoy!

1)


2)


3)


4)


5)



Thanks for looking!

adbsgicom

#1 like the line of guys, just not pulled in to it.
#2 is great. I thought the fire extinquishers were coffee urns at first.
#3
#4
#5

thoth

adbsgicom wrote:

#1 like the line of guys, just not pulled in to it.
#2 is great. I thought the fire extinquishers were coffee urns at first.
#3
#4
#5

Thanks Andrew. I can live with 4 out of 5.

Richard

thoth wrote:

Thanks Andrew. I can live with 4 out of 5.

I like them all, but #4 is my favorite. I don't know what they are saying, but somehow I think the word "yep" recurs. Fine work, thoth.

thoth

Richard wrote:

I don't know what they are saying, but somehow I think the word "yep" recurs.

I'm guessing you're right!

Thanks for the kind words, Richard.

tortillatorture

nr5 is instant favourite! really sweet. Love the bg and dof.

bdcolen

thoth wrote:

Enjoy!

]


Thanks for looking!

Andrew pretty much nailed it, Travis - 3, 4 and 5 are really wonderful. The first one is intriguing, but ultimately leaves me flat - though I can't say why. And I sort of like #2, but I have to say that I'm getting tired of photos making fun of fat people.

But 3 out of 5 is pretty damn good!

thoth

tortillatorture wrote:

nr5 is instant favourite! really sweet. Love the bg and dof.

Thanks very much!

bdcolen wrote:

Andrew pretty much nailed it, Travis - 3, 4 and 5 are really wonderful. The first one is intriguing, but ultimately leaves me flat - though I can't say why. And I sort of like #2, but I have to say that I'm getting tired of photos making fun of fat people.

But 3 out of 5 is pretty damn good!

Thanks for the comments, B.D.

I think I can understand the apprehension folks are having to number one. My eye saw a sort of mixed up evolutionary scale happening here but I'm thinking that isn't obvious, or intriguing, to others.

To me, making fun of a fat person would be more akin to snapping a shot of an obese woman with an ice cream cone. We've all seen shots of that type and I am inclined to agree that most are in poor taste. Number two wasn't just about being fat to me, however. I wanted to say something about the luxury of rank but maybe that didn't work out either. It's always good to know when you're stepping across someones lines!

And yes, 3 out of 5 still rocks! I'll take that any day!

bdcolen

thoth wrote:

Thanks very much!


Thanks for the comments, B.D.

I think I can understand the apprehension folks are having to number one. My eye saw a sort of mixed up evolutionary scale happening here but I'm thinking that isn't obvious, or intriguing, to others.

No, I saw what you were doing with number 1, but it somehow just misses. I think you needed to work it a bit more.

thoth

bdcolen wrote:

No, I saw what you were doing with number 1, but it somehow just misses. I think you needed to work it a bit more.

Here's a little wider version of number one. I don't feel as cramped looking at this one but I'm not so sure it helped the shot. Opinions?

bdcolen

thoth wrote:

Here's a little wider version of number one. I don't feel as cramped looking at this one but I'm not so sure it helped the shot. Opinions?

I think what it may need to achieve that special something is having the three heads all turned the same way, with the third head more visible than it is. Sorry, but it's hard to really put my finger on it.

thoth

bdcolen wrote:

I think what it may need to achieve that special something is having the three heads all turned the same way, with the third head more visible than it is. Sorry, but it's hard to really put my finger on it.

Np, B.D. Thanks for the advice. I think maybe it will just have to be what it is.