Let me ask you: what are you trying to say here?
IMHO, the image is so ambiguous that I currently see no way of providing a reasonable set of comments.
Let me ask you: what are you trying to say here?
IMHO, the image is so ambiguous that I currently see no way of providing a reasonable set of comments.
The title of the shot is "Modest"
Playing with the idea of a covered nude. She is covering herself but at the same time relaxed/not tense or self conscious about her body. We just are not privileged to se behind her hands.
The title of the shot is "Modest"
Playing with the idea of a covered nude. She is covering herself but at the same time relaxed/not tense or self conscious about her body. We just are not privileged to se behind her hands.
Thank you! I think if you had provided the title right off the bat you woud have get a bit more action here:-)
To me, though, it' still too vague. The frame is so tight and processing is so neutral that it's not possible to tell the race, an age or even a gender of the subject. Even the fact that person being married is only valid for US (e.g. in Russia it's sign of a widow/er). The only thing we can gather is, well, the covered genitals.... Again, since no other info is available, there is no mistery, no questions - hence no comments....
The title of the shot is "Modest"
Playing with the idea of a covered nude. She is covering herself but at the same time relaxed/not tense or self conscious about her body. We just are not privileged to se behind her hands.
I don't get all of this from the photo. IMHO it doesn't give me enough info.
A shot with "more" could've served this idea better. Although, I think I can see exactly what your thought process might have been, and I can definitely appreciate it.
Comments
Beauty is all around us. Take the time to capture and preserve it.
IMHO, the image is so ambiguous that I currently see no way of providing a reasonable set of comments.
Playing with the idea of a covered nude. She is covering herself but at the same time relaxed/not tense or self conscious about her body. We just are not privileged to se behind her hands.
Beauty is all around us. Take the time to capture and preserve it.
To me, though, it' still too vague. The frame is so tight and processing is so neutral that it's not possible to tell the race, an age or even a gender of the subject. Even the fact that person being married is only valid for US (e.g. in Russia it's sign of a widow/er). The only thing we can gather is, well, the covered genitals....
I don't get all of this from the photo. IMHO it doesn't give me enough info.
Sorry....