I need opinions on which to print.

JacobovsJacobovs Registered Users Posts: 491 Major grins
edited October 23, 2009 in Sports
I shot the skaters and and skateboarders this weekend. I am going for kind of an "edgy grunge" look. Which ones do you think do that best? I will post the original then 2 versions. Thanks!

1)

686938035_MkbvY-XL.jpg

V1
686937722_SSPHJ-XL.jpg

V2
686937124_Lj6YJ-XL.jpg


2)

686938875_QtqqQ-XL.jpg

V1

686938801_kaffU-XL.jpg

V2

686938358_PHEPE-XL.jpg

Comments

  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,941 moderator
    edited October 20, 2009
    Have a look through some skate magazine for ideas on how to process. I generally like the processing in the V2's. But the backgrounds really bork the shot.
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • ErbemanErbeman Registered Users Posts: 926 Major grins
    edited October 21, 2009
    I personally don't think any amount of PP is going to make these pics all that great. In the first pic, my eye was quickly drawn to his shoes. They look blown out and blurry. The 2nd pic is better, but is just too busy. Keep at it though. Practice makes perfect my friend.
    Come see my Photos at:
    http://www.RussErbePhotography.com :thumb
    http://www.sportsshooter.com/erbeman



    D700, D300, Nikkor 35-70 F/2.8, Nikkor 50mm F/1.8, Nikkor 70-200 AF-S VR F/2.8, Nikkor AF-S 1.7 teleconverter II,(2) Profoto D1 500 Air,SB-900, SB-600, (2)MB-D10, MacBook Pro
  • toragstorags Registered Users Posts: 4,615 Major grins
    edited October 21, 2009
    I've been experimenting with coarse B&W. If you want grunge it may work.

    Maybe you would like to try it. I take an original (before crop) apply a film grain and sharpen excessively, then crop. See where you are then apply your color separations. I like the last two, his tats are not blown
    Rags
  • JacobovsJacobovs Registered Users Posts: 491 Major grins
    edited October 21, 2009
    Erbeman wrote:
    I personally don't think any amount of PP is going to make these pics all that great. In the first pic, my eye was quickly drawn to his shoes. They look blown out and blurry. The 2nd pic is better, but is just too busy. Keep at it though. Practice makes perfect my friend.

    Thanks, I appreciate the feedback.
  • JacobovsJacobovs Registered Users Posts: 491 Major grins
    edited October 21, 2009
    torags wrote:
    I've been experimenting with coarse B&W. If you want grunge it may work.

    Maybe you would like to try it. I take an original (before crop) apply a film grain and sharpen excessively, then crop. See where you are then apply your color separations. I like the last two, his tats are not blown

    Thanks. I took a stab at it. Is this what you mean?

    688261761_vmgm4-X2.jpg
  • GringriffGringriff Registered Users Posts: 340 Major grins
    edited October 23, 2009
    Just an opinion here but...

    #1 - The original looks best. The processing (especially in V1) is bringing out too many large white/gray specs/spots in the background. And I prefer the more natural colors in #1 over V2.

    #2 - In this shot the processing in V1 seems like an improvement over the original. I just wish his shirt was pulled down to his belt as in the first one. (It is a pet peeve of mine the kids wearing the pants down below their underwear)
    Andy
    http://andygriffinphoto.com/
    http://andygriffin.smugmug.com/
    Canon 7D, 70-200mm L, 50 and 85 primes, Tamron 17-50, 28-135
Sign In or Register to comment.