I have a hard time with collages. I think the shots might be interesting, but I would like to see them as a series rather than the way they are presented.
I like it. I think any one of the images could stand on its own, but I like the way the composition creates a silent dialogue. Nice images. The whole thing makes me want to cough a little, but I like it.
Thanks for taking the time to offer your comments - very much appreciated.
I have been lurking here for a week or so and got inspired to revisit some of my old photos. These shots were from a series that I shot of a homeless man named Nicholas (the "Solace in a Cup" guy from an old DSS entry). I have a hundred images or so of him and I particularly liked these of him smoking. I enjoyed putting together the collage and am pleased with the way it turned out.
I realize that the presentation isn't what is usually done for this forum and I knew it wouldn't be everyone's (anyone's?) cup of tea. But, I feel that there something like a single strand of a silk thread connecting me with him from the act of taking his photograph and I can't help but wonder what has become of him in the ensueing 20 months...I wonder if he ever made it back to San Francisco...
Godspeed to you Nicholas
(& you too Preacher John)
I like this second batch much better than the collage. Each one has an interesting hook. I don't love sepia.
I agree - The last one is by far the best of the batch, and I'd definitely lose the sepia. The smoking series is just that - a guy smoking. He happens to be a street person, but he's still just a guy smoking. The center one is by far the best of the collage batch, but...
Like a number of other people, I'm impressed by your photoshop skills and your production of the collage, but I strongly believe that a photo lives or dies on its own; if it requires this kind of post processing and presentation to make it interesting, then it's not interesting. The series in the collage, as a series, really doesn't do anything for me - it's different shots of a guy smoking. The center image is a strong street portrait, and I'd keep that and lose the rest. What the collage suggests to me is a hesitancy to do the editing necessary to pick the best image from a shoot. Just sayin'
Comments
I've been looking at this since you posted it.
These are the aspects that I like a lot.
The incongruity of the white gloves.
The quality of the pictures.
The use of the texture (I love textures).
I suppose this is an technically excellent candid portrait - or rather series of portraits.
Still, I am having some problems with the whole.
In the end, I think the story can be told with the central picture alone. Everything is there.
I confess, too, that, if it were mine, I would texturize the portrait. Assuming I had your skills, of course.
Virginia
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
www.SaraPiazza.com - Edgartown News - Trad Diary - Facebook
I have been lurking here for a week or so and got inspired to revisit some of my old photos. These shots were from a series that I shot of a homeless man named Nicholas (the "Solace in a Cup" guy from an old DSS entry). I have a hundred images or so of him and I particularly liked these of him smoking. I enjoyed putting together the collage and am pleased with the way it turned out.
I realize that the presentation isn't what is usually done for this forum and I knew it wouldn't be everyone's (anyone's?) cup of tea. But, I feel that there something like a single strand of a silk thread connecting me with him from the act of taking his photograph and I can't help but wonder what has become of him in the ensueing 20 months...I wonder if he ever made it back to San Francisco...
Godspeed to you Nicholas
(& you too Preacher John)
Here's a couple more:
Thanks Rutt...I've been enjoying the banter between you and BD (and your photo's too!)
I agree - The last one is by far the best of the batch, and I'd definitely lose the sepia. The smoking series is just that - a guy smoking. He happens to be a street person, but he's still just a guy smoking. The center one is by far the best of the collage batch, but...
Like a number of other people, I'm impressed by your photoshop skills and your production of the collage, but I strongly believe that a photo lives or dies on its own; if it requires this kind of post processing and presentation to make it interesting, then it's not interesting. The series in the collage, as a series, really doesn't do anything for me - it's different shots of a guy smoking. The center image is a strong street portrait, and I'd keep that and lose the rest. What the collage suggests to me is a hesitancy to do the editing necessary to pick the best image from a shoot. Just sayin'
"He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
"The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
I think the sepia may diminish the contrast of a B&W on the facial furrows (did I just say that?)
BTW, the smoker has some pretty good shoes for a homeless guy. If he comes to town (SF) they may steal them...
The shots are excellent, very nice work